Techcrunch Disrupted by AOL: The end of an era in tech blogging?

The news/rumor that Techcrunch is up for sale quickly made the rounds at the Techcrunch Disrupt conference this afternoon. GigaOm started it with a post that a sale to AOL is close at hand.

I’ve been burned by these kinds of rumors before, I remember when it was rumored that AOL was buying Mashable, but those discussions never led anywhere.

This time, however, I was back stage at the Disrupt conference when the news started making the rounds. I quickly asked staff members about the rumor. They didn’t know anything, they said. OK, maybe this is just a rumor, I thought, but then one offered “but I’ve heard a rumor there are multiple deals being considered.”

Then I noticed that Mike and Heather weren’t anywhere to be found, and people pointed to closed doors and said “they are in there.”

Later, I ran into Heather Harde, CEO of Techcrunch and asked her “can you talk to me about the news?” She answered quickly “nope.”

Even later, at Techcrunch’s dinner, I met Keith Teare, who was one of the guys part of the founding of Techcrunch and is the third owner of Techcrunch. Mike owns a majority share (a large majority, I was told), with Heather owning a healthy share, and Keith owning a far smaller share.

Keith told me he hadn’t heard anything from Mike and Heather yet, but that as a minority shareholder that he would only need to be told when it is time to sign paperwork. As of 10 p.m. that paperwork had not been signed by Keith yet. So, no confirmation on any deal tonight.

Arrington hasn’t answered my queries. I’ve talked with half a dozen of Techcrunch staff and they all say they don’t know what is going on so won’t make any confirmations.

That all said, it sure seems like something is going on and I’m very confident that a sale is in the offing. But is it AOL, like GigaOm reported? Well, GigaOm is usually very accurate on such matters, Om is the best in the business.

I saw Heather later again and she didn’t wave me off the story. Loic Le Meur ran into Arrington at the dinner and he wasn’t waved off either.

Now that the news part of this blog is covered, what will I speculate on?

1. Amount. Jason Calacanis sold to AOL for $25 million. I can’t see Arrington taking less than that and I’m sure he’d love to double, or even, triple that amount to rub it in (Jason, tonight, on his Twitter account, has been making it very clear that the two didn’t split on amicable terms). So, my guess is that the sale would be between $50 million and $75 million.

2. Does Arrington stay or go? My gut told me Arrington would want to get out of the deal as fast as possible, but after talking with a few insiders at dinner who know Mike very well I’m starting to turn my opinion. They told me that Mike would be very attracted to a deal where he could have a significant presence at AOL. Once I started considering this I said “well, if Arrington stays at AOL then AOL sure will be a lot more interesting than it was before.”

3. Techcrunch staff? Sounds like they all split up a small percentage of stock. Did MG Siegler own enough to become a millionaire? Hopefully so, he sure has played a key role in getting Techcrunch to be seen as viable without Arrington. Some of the staff told me quietly that they were worried about what working for AOL would be like and that Techcrunch wouldn’t be the same kind of publication post acquisition. I told them they should look to Engadget for some clues to how AOL deals with content properties it acquires. That’s seemed to have gone pretty well.

4. PR pressures. I doubt PR teams will change their strategies much right away, but over time they might spread stories out to other blogs. Arrington was very strict and wouldn’t run stories if Techcrunch wasn’t given equal access to launch stories. That forced PR teams to think out how they deal with Techcrunch and usually they played Arrington’s game, which brought them a pretty good story/press release flow.

5. News breaks. I’ve watched Arrington close up, spending hours in his hotel room at a VC conference once as he grilled people on the phone to try to get news out of them. That’s a skill that few in the industry have and it’s why he’s been at the top of the Techmeme leaderboard more often and longer than any other journalist/blogger I know.

So, I don’t think this ends Techcrunch, but it certainly will make it just another big brand that doesn’t change that much. With Arrington involved you could always expect some surprises every month and I bet the frequency of surprises goes down over time. How dramatically? Time will tell.

I’ve watched Arrington from the very first day he published (he regularly tells people I was the first blogger to link to Techcrunch) and it’s an organization I’ve always looked up to, even with a little bit of a jealous eye. “If I were smarter or more ambitious, I could have built that,” I remember thinking to myself once in a while. Stupid thinking, I know, because I’ve built an absolutely awesome life and I really don’t want to do the hard work of building a business. Mike has my respect for doing the hard work of building a great brand and team. I don’t know when I’ll see a similar effort, so tonight, my glass is raised to Mike and his team and I’ll be in the front row tomorrow to hear exactly the details of this news.

Then again, I’d love it if Arrington pulled AOL’s CEO up on stage and rips up the contract right in front of him and says “we’re staying independent.” Just the kind of surprise I’d love to see at the Disrupt Conference.

But, tonight, I expect that Mike will, instead, grab the check and head to the bank and with his deposit signature will be putting the final punctuation mark on an incredible story in publishing history. Thanks for all the disruption of the past five years Techcrunch!


The real-time curation wars (exclusive first look at

Back in March I wrote a post about the seven needs of real-time curators. Over the next week or so no less than three companies are shipping services that will fulfill that dream with tools that comply with all seven needs.

What are they?

1. (My Techcrunch Disrupt tweets on is here).
2. Storify. (My Techcrunch Disrupt Storify bundle). Most of Storify’s tool is under NDA until announced later this week, so I can’t talk more about the tool.
3. Keepstream. (My Techcrunch Disrupt page on Keepstream).
4. Bag the Web. (My Techcrunch Disrupt page on Bag the Web).

First, I recorded an audio post about what is real time curation and what problem does it solve? You might listen to that, because it’ll explain what these tools are solving and how I’ll judge them over the next few days. Listen here:

Second, I recorded a video last week with’s founder, Bastian Lehmann. This is the first look that I know of at this curation tool and a discussion of how he’ll compete and make money providing these curation tools.

Based on my first playing with these tools it is clear that and Storify are in the lead. They let you mix multiple media together, not just Tweets, and have good and easy-to-use drag-and-drop interfaces to let you reorder things. Who will be best? I need a few days putting them through their paces. If you are using these tools at Techcrunch, post your URLs in the comment area here and I’ll link your curation into mine, which is one way to get group curation.

Also, most, if not all, of these are embed-able in blog posts, so they are designed for the modern web and they seem to understand how to distribute themselves back into Twitter and Facebook. Below I’ll embed each of the curated feeds so you can watch them all in the morning and see how they behave when updated.


title:’Techcrunch Disrupt’,






Bag the Web:

Corporate developers: exclusive first look at Application Craft, a new tool for corporate web apps

In the 1990s we had Visual Basic, Delphi, and then Visual Studio come along. All great tools for corporate developers who needed to build apps for their workgroups.

But since then developer tools have stagnated. Yeah, we’ve had Ruby on Rails, but that’s really aimed at web developers (Twitter was originally built in it, for instance) and the kinds of database and UI tools that corporate developers needed weren’t there.

Today Application Craft (CrunchBase info on Application Craft) is releasing a new system that looks somewhat like Visual Studio, but is completely web based. Here CEO Freddy May spends a lot of time with me showing how it works and giving me some idea of the power underneath.

Oh, and you can build a LOT without knowing any code. May says it’s not just aimed at developers, but can be used by “citizen developers.” IE, those who don’t know how to code very well. That is exactly the audience that Visual Basic was aimed at back in 1992, and it went on to be the tool for corporate developers. Will Application Craft take over that mantle? We’ll see, but this is a very interesting start. What do you think?