Published by Robert Scoble
I give you a front-row seat on the future. Focusing most of my efforts now on next-generation augmented reality and artificial intelligence, AKA "mixed reality."
SUBSCRIBE TO MY NEWSLETTER: http://clevermoe.com/scobleizer-news/
BUY OUR NEW BOOK: https://www.amazon.com/Fourth-Transformation-Robert-Scoble/dp/1539894444 "The Fourth Transformation: How augmented reality and artificial intelligence will change everything."
WATCH MY LATEST SPEECHES:
State of VR with Philip Rosedale (done in VR itself, very cool): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2zAA1EVGUZU
At GEOINT, June 2017: http://trajectorymagazine.com/glimpse-new-world/
Augmented World Expo, June 2017: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l4xHILvLD8E
At Leade.rs, April 2017: https://youtu.be/52_0JshgjXI
+++++++++++
BIO:
Scoble gives you a front-row seat on the future.
Literally. He had the first ride in the first Tesla. Siri was launched in his house. He's been the first to share all sorts of technologies and companies with you, from Flipboard to Pandora to Instagram.
Today he's focusing on mixed reality, AKA "next-generation augmented reality" which will include a new user interface for EVERYTHING in your life (IoT, Smart Cities, driverless cars, robots, drones, etc).
That's based on his view thanks to his past experience as futurist at Rackspace.
Best place to find Scoble? On his Facebook profile at https://www.facebook.com/RobertScoble
He has been a technology blogger since 2000, was one of five people who built Microsoft's Channel 9 video blog/community, worked at Fast Company Magazine running its TV efforts, and has been part of technology media businesses since 1993.
++++++++
SPEAKER PITCH:
Apple and Facebook now have revealed their Augmented Reality strategies, which means your business needs one too. Rely on Robert Scoble, the world's top authority on AR, to bring to your conference what businesses should do next.
SPEECH ABSTRACT #1:
TITLE: The Fourth Transformation: What's next in mixed reality (AR and AI) and the future of technology?
Here's an example of this talk at Leade.rs in Paris in April, 2017: https://youtu.be/52_0JshgjXI
Why "the Fourth Transformation?"
Soon we will have phones and glasses that do full on augmented reality. Everything you look at will potentially be augmented. This world is coming in late 2017 with a new iPhone from Apple, amongst other products. Microsoft is betting everything on its HoloLens glasses that do mixed reality and the industry is spending many billions of dollars in R&D and funding new companies like Magic Leap.
This future will be the user interface for IoT, Smart Cities, autonomous cars, robots, drones, and your TV.
This is a big deal and Robert will take you through what mixed reality is and how it will change every business.
Learn more about Robert's speaking style and contact his agent at http://odemanagement.com/robert-scoble/Robert-Scoble.html
++++++++
SPEECH ABSTRACT #2:
"The Next Two Clicks of Moore's Law."
Over the next four years, or two clicks of Moore's Law, a ton about our technology world will change. Scoble will bring you the best from his travels visiting R&D labs, startups, and innovators around the world.
He views the world through his rose-colored-mixed-reality glasses, which will be the new user interface for self driving cars, Smart Cities, IoT, and many other things in our world.
He'll send you off with some lessons for companies both large and small.
++++++++
SPEECH ABSTRACT #3:
"Personalized Meaning: What is Augmented Reality For?"
As we enter a far more technological world where even cars drive themselves, I predict we'll see a blowback toward the analog, more authentic world.
What role does augmented reality play in both worlds?
Get Scoble's insight into where augmented reality is going, see tons of real-world demos, and understand what he means by 'personalized meaning.'
CONTACT:
If you are looking to contact me, email is best: scobleizer@gmail.com.
++++++++
ENDORSEMENTS:
IZEA Top 25 Tech Influencers: https://izea.com/2017/07/07/25-top-tech-influencers/
Time: One of the top 140 Twitterers!
FT: One of the five most influential Twitterers!
Inc. Top 5 on list of Tech Power Players You Need to Know: http://www.inc.com/john-rampton/30-power-players-in-tech-you-need-to-know.html
Next Reality: #4 on top 50 AR influencer list: https://next.reality.news/news/nr50-next-realitys-50-people-watch-augmented-mixed-reality-0177454/
View all posts by Robert Scoble
The sample applications are up and running now:
http://code.google.com/apis/socialgraph/docs/examples.html
LikeLike
The sample applications are up and running now:
http://code.google.com/apis/socialgraph/docs/examples.html
LikeLike
This is HUGE news, overshadowed by MSFT/YHOO for the time being. I don’t think it an exaggeration to say:
“This changes everything.”
LikeLike
This is HUGE news, overshadowed by MSFT/YHOO for the time being. I don’t think it an exaggeration to say:
“This changes everything.”
LikeLike
❤ Web 3.0!!!
LikeLike
❤ Web 3.0!!!
LikeLike
I love the sound of this, certainly – I have at least one friend with five or six connections between us (LinkedIn, Facebook, Twitter and her blog’s RSS feed, as well as friend status on a few forum sites) and being able to copy relationships around would be very welcome.
(Rant from European about how evil Google is and how this breaks EU law in 3, 2…)
LikeLike
I love the sound of this, certainly – I have at least one friend with five or six connections between us (LinkedIn, Facebook, Twitter and her blog’s RSS feed, as well as friend status on a few forum sites) and being able to copy relationships around would be very welcome.
(Rant from European about how evil Google is and how this breaks EU law in 3, 2…)
LikeLike
Robert,
As always, top notch insight. I wonder at what we might call “the cart before the horse” syndrome.” In integrating all these services Google has done something fantastico, but should these services not be focused on the quality of data involved rather than how to “migrate” a beer to someone from Facebook to Twitter?
I think that if we begin a discourse on this issue, then perhaps we will have some data to traverse the web with. Not to seem to critical, but should we not focus some on taking this Web to the next level?
Always,
Phil
LikeLike
Robert,
As always, top notch insight. I wonder at what we might call “the cart before the horse” syndrome.” In integrating all these services Google has done something fantastico, but should these services not be focused on the quality of data involved rather than how to “migrate” a beer to someone from Facebook to Twitter?
I think that if we begin a discourse on this issue, then perhaps we will have some data to traverse the web with. Not to seem to critical, but should we not focus some on taking this Web to the next level?
Always,
Phil
LikeLike
Have you heard of Austin based Minggl http://www.minggl.com? From their site: Minggl is a toolbar that brings your social sites together in one place, feeding you the latest activities of friends, no matter where you are on the web.
LikeLike
Have you heard of Austin based Minggl http://www.minggl.com? From their site: Minggl is a toolbar that brings your social sites together in one place, feeding you the latest activities of friends, no matter where you are on the web.
LikeLike
If Microsoft would have done this we would up in arms….
Google does not control the relationships or the api……Just like they dont control any of the content that they spider that does not belong to them…..and turn this content that they dont own into billons of dollars for Google and very little for the original creators of the content….If goog is so good….why don’t they open source the entire project and create a non profit to run “Open” Social….They will not do this because they want to corner the market on the indexing of relationships that should be owned and controlled by the end users and not Google…Will Google ask me for permission to crawl my relationships ?
Can I delete my relationships from the Google servers…The data is on Google’s servers….and they are a company…so they do own the data…
….How is this better than facebook ?
Did Google contact any of the other companies that have social networks to ask them for their input ?
No….
Will there be a standards committee that allows end users and companies other than Google to have some input into “Open” Social..Dont hold your breath….its not going to happen…
Any initiative to deal with a “Social” Graph should not be run by anyone company…Google is a company and we should stop fooling ourselves that they are in business for the public “Good”.
Google is in Business to make money and this means that by their nature they will try to dominate with little to no regard to any notion of an open standard that would even the playing field for their competitors.
LikeLike
If Microsoft would have done this we would up in arms….
Google does not control the relationships or the api……Just like they dont control any of the content that they spider that does not belong to them…..and turn this content that they dont own into billons of dollars for Google and very little for the original creators of the content….If goog is so good….why don’t they open source the entire project and create a non profit to run “Open” Social….They will not do this because they want to corner the market on the indexing of relationships that should be owned and controlled by the end users and not Google…Will Google ask me for permission to crawl my relationships ?
Can I delete my relationships from the Google servers…The data is on Google’s servers….and they are a company…so they do own the data…
….How is this better than facebook ?
Did Google contact any of the other companies that have social networks to ask them for their input ?
No….
Will there be a standards committee that allows end users and companies other than Google to have some input into “Open” Social..Dont hold your breath….its not going to happen…
Any initiative to deal with a “Social” Graph should not be run by anyone company…Google is a company and we should stop fooling ourselves that they are in business for the public “Good”.
Google is in Business to make money and this means that by their nature they will try to dominate with little to no regard to any notion of an open standard that would even the playing field for their competitors.
LikeLike
Interesting stuff as I, a digital immigrant, subscribe to more social networks and struggle to internalize the value. But, it also will influence our corporate decisions about how best to integrated and apply exrternal social networks — or at least their functionality — to the enterprise collaboration software we develop.
LikeLike
Interesting stuff as I, a digital immigrant, subscribe to more social networks and struggle to internalize the value. But, it also will influence our corporate decisions about how best to integrated and apply exrternal social networks — or at least their functionality — to the enterprise collaboration software we develop.
LikeLike
Hi Robert, it’s actually Brad Fitzpatrick, not Brad Fitzgerald.
LikeLike
Hi Robert, it’s actually Brad Fitzpatrick, not Brad Fitzgerald.
LikeLike
I guess this is kind of like the google reader for social networks.
Be even cooler if you could pull in the data from your relationships.
Eric
LikeLike
I guess this is kind of like the google reader for social networks.
Be even cooler if you could pull in the data from your relationships.
Eric
LikeLike
Where do these people get the time to join and read the stuff on these social networks. Methinks some of it must get outsourced to lower wage countries.
LikeLike
Where do these people get the time to join and read the stuff on these social networks. Methinks some of it must get outsourced to lower wage countries.
LikeLike
I think the problem with social networks is they have very short lives. I think Digg has already jumped the shark as have a number of others.
LikeLike
I think the problem with social networks is they have very short lives. I think Digg has already jumped the shark as have a number of others.
LikeLike
I think Digg jumped the shark when they broadened their appeal.
They were very much tech focused, now they are far more general. Slashdot may make the same mistake.
LikeLike
I think Digg jumped the shark when they broadened their appeal.
They were very much tech focused, now they are far more general. Slashdot may make the same mistake.
LikeLike