Published by Robert Scoble
I give you a front-row seat on the future. Focusing most of my efforts now on next-generation augmented reality and artificial intelligence, AKA "mixed reality."
SUBSCRIBE TO MY NEWSLETTER: http://clevermoe.com/scobleizer-news/
BUY OUR NEW BOOK: https://www.amazon.com/Fourth-Transformation-Robert-Scoble/dp/1539894444 "The Fourth Transformation: How augmented reality and artificial intelligence will change everything."
WATCH MY LATEST SPEECHES:
State of VR with Philip Rosedale (done in VR itself, very cool): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2zAA1EVGUZU
At GEOINT, June 2017: http://trajectorymagazine.com/glimpse-new-world/
Augmented World Expo, June 2017: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l4xHILvLD8E
At Leade.rs, April 2017: https://youtu.be/52_0JshgjXI
+++++++++++
BIO:
Scoble gives you a front-row seat on the future.
Literally. He had the first ride in the first Tesla. Siri was launched in his house. He's been the first to share all sorts of technologies and companies with you, from Flipboard to Pandora to Instagram.
Today he's focusing on mixed reality, AKA "next-generation augmented reality" which will include a new user interface for EVERYTHING in your life (IoT, Smart Cities, driverless cars, robots, drones, etc).
That's based on his view thanks to his past experience as futurist at Rackspace.
Best place to find Scoble? On his Facebook profile at https://www.facebook.com/RobertScoble
He has been a technology blogger since 2000, was one of five people who built Microsoft's Channel 9 video blog/community, worked at Fast Company Magazine running its TV efforts, and has been part of technology media businesses since 1993.
++++++++
SPEAKER PITCH:
Apple and Facebook now have revealed their Augmented Reality strategies, which means your business needs one too. Rely on Robert Scoble, the world's top authority on AR, to bring to your conference what businesses should do next.
SPEECH ABSTRACT #1:
TITLE: The Fourth Transformation: What's next in mixed reality (AR and AI) and the future of technology?
Here's an example of this talk at Leade.rs in Paris in April, 2017: https://youtu.be/52_0JshgjXI
Why "the Fourth Transformation?"
Soon we will have phones and glasses that do full on augmented reality. Everything you look at will potentially be augmented. This world is coming in late 2017 with a new iPhone from Apple, amongst other products. Microsoft is betting everything on its HoloLens glasses that do mixed reality and the industry is spending many billions of dollars in R&D and funding new companies like Magic Leap.
This future will be the user interface for IoT, Smart Cities, autonomous cars, robots, drones, and your TV.
This is a big deal and Robert will take you through what mixed reality is and how it will change every business.
Learn more about Robert's speaking style and contact his agent at http://odemanagement.com/robert-scoble/Robert-Scoble.html
++++++++
SPEECH ABSTRACT #2:
"The Next Two Clicks of Moore's Law."
Over the next four years, or two clicks of Moore's Law, a ton about our technology world will change. Scoble will bring you the best from his travels visiting R&D labs, startups, and innovators around the world.
He views the world through his rose-colored-mixed-reality glasses, which will be the new user interface for self driving cars, Smart Cities, IoT, and many other things in our world.
He'll send you off with some lessons for companies both large and small.
++++++++
SPEECH ABSTRACT #3:
"Personalized Meaning: What is Augmented Reality For?"
As we enter a far more technological world where even cars drive themselves, I predict we'll see a blowback toward the analog, more authentic world.
What role does augmented reality play in both worlds?
Get Scoble's insight into where augmented reality is going, see tons of real-world demos, and understand what he means by 'personalized meaning.'
CONTACT:
If you are looking to contact me, email is best: scobleizer@gmail.com.
++++++++
ENDORSEMENTS:
IZEA Top 25 Tech Influencers: https://izea.com/2017/07/07/25-top-tech-influencers/
Time: One of the top 140 Twitterers!
FT: One of the five most influential Twitterers!
Inc. Top 5 on list of Tech Power Players You Need to Know: http://www.inc.com/john-rampton/30-power-players-in-tech-you-need-to-know.html
Next Reality: #4 on top 50 AR influencer list: https://next.reality.news/news/nr50-next-realitys-50-people-watch-augmented-mixed-reality-0177454/
View all posts by Robert Scoble
Joi is very into photography, maybe you should do a photo walk video together.
LikeLike
Joi is very into photography, maybe you should do a photo walk video together.
LikeLike
Yeah, but he has a $25,000 Hasselblad and a Leica. I am already sad that I need to send the Nikon back! 🙂 Well, be watching Qik today. Who knows?
LikeLike
Yeah, but he has a $25,000 Hasselblad and a Leica. I am already sad that I need to send the Nikon back! 🙂 Well, be watching Qik today. Who knows?
LikeLike
Start doing everything in HDR and you will look professional anyways.
LikeLike
Start doing everything in HDR and you will look professional anyways.
LikeLike
Christoper,
HDR won’t help you with photographing people in poorly lit places. People have a tendency to move around.
Robert,
The reason why photo journalists shoot 100 shots of what seems to be all the same is because they are looking for that one photos which shows an expression that will fit the news stories headline.
As for audience shots, they usually have two purposes. Firstly to establish a scene. They might be used in a multi-page article in a magazine to show a different angle people haven’t seen already in the news or daily papers. Those shots are also put on file and might be used in a different context at a later stage.
I find it interesting that the first differentiating point you mention is photogear related. The reality is that what really differentiates them from you is that they probably have a few years experiencing of covering live political events and know what will happen just before it actually happens. This allows them to be in the right place and get the right angle at the right time. It’s 40% talent, 40% experience and 10% the camera/ lens.
From your D3 photos on flickr is look like the white balance in a lot of the tungsten lit shots is somewhat off to the point where people have serious yellow fever… personally I wouldn’t want to trade my Mark III’s for a D3 if those are the results you get.
LikeLike
Christoper,
HDR won’t help you with photographing people in poorly lit places. People have a tendency to move around.
Robert,
The reason why photo journalists shoot 100 shots of what seems to be all the same is because they are looking for that one photos which shows an expression that will fit the news stories headline.
As for audience shots, they usually have two purposes. Firstly to establish a scene. They might be used in a multi-page article in a magazine to show a different angle people haven’t seen already in the news or daily papers. Those shots are also put on file and might be used in a different context at a later stage.
I find it interesting that the first differentiating point you mention is photogear related. The reality is that what really differentiates them from you is that they probably have a few years experiencing of covering live political events and know what will happen just before it actually happens. This allows them to be in the right place and get the right angle at the right time. It’s 40% talent, 40% experience and 10% the camera/ lens.
From your D3 photos on flickr is look like the white balance in a lot of the tungsten lit shots is somewhat off to the point where people have serious yellow fever… personally I wouldn’t want to trade my Mark III’s for a D3 if those are the results you get.
LikeLike
I’m all about the Leicas… best camera I’ve ever used. Even their less expensive models are top notch compared to far more expensive stuff.
LikeLike
I’m all about the Leicas… best camera I’ve ever used. Even their less expensive models are top notch compared to far more expensive stuff.
LikeLike
Oh surely you are too modest, Mr. Scoble. There are many people in the British Empire who wouldn’t hesitate to call you a pro.
LikeLike
Oh surely you are too modest, Mr. Scoble. There are many people in the British Empire who wouldn’t hesitate to call you a pro.
LikeLike
“That said, they were jealous of the Nikon D3 I was carrying. They knew it was more sensitive to low light.”
If they were truly pros, I very much doubt that.
LikeLike
“That said, they were jealous of the Nikon D3 I was carrying. They knew it was more sensitive to low light.”
If they were truly pros, I very much doubt that.
LikeLike
I don’t think anything could look LESS professional than “doing everything in HDR”.
And yes Steve, I know of several professionals working for national and global newspapers who genuinely covet the D3, but can’t switch because of their Canon affiliation. Having handled and shot the camera recently, it is definitely a step beyond every DSLR presently in terms of low light shooting — the ISO 6400 is amazing.
LikeLike
I don’t think anything could look LESS professional than “doing everything in HDR”.
And yes Steve, I know of several professionals working for national and global newspapers who genuinely covet the D3, but can’t switch because of their Canon affiliation. Having handled and shot the camera recently, it is definitely a step beyond every DSLR presently in terms of low light shooting — the ISO 6400 is amazing.
LikeLike
dude, are you still sleeping at SFO. MS just bought yahoo while you were sleeping 🙂
LikeLike
dude, are you still sleeping at SFO. MS just bought yahoo while you were sleeping 🙂
LikeLike
@8 that very well may the case. I guess I should qualified it by saying “if based on scobles pictures”. As Thomas pointed out.the wb is off on a majority of the shots. Plus the framing is amateurish and focusing marginal. Proving the adage: its not the camera its the photgrapher. Its unfortunate that some may base the petformance of the D3 on these P&S quality pictures.
LikeLike
@8 that very well may the case. I guess I should qualified it by saying “if based on scobles pictures”. As Thomas pointed out.the wb is off on a majority of the shots. Plus the framing is amateurish and focusing marginal. Proving the adage: its not the camera its the photgrapher. Its unfortunate that some may base the petformance of the D3 on these P&S quality pictures.
LikeLike
Steve: I used automatic white balance. I did not process any of these pictures. A professional would have brought them into Photoshop and would have adjusted the white balance there. Heck, a real professional would have carried a white card and would have done manual white balancing.
As for focus: that’s why professionals shoot 10x more photos. I was watching the real pros and their focus was just as bad as mine (it’s hard to get it right when shooting a 300 F2.8 wide open) but they shot so many, and kept checking to make sure they got good ones.
LikeLike
Steve: I used automatic white balance. I did not process any of these pictures. A professional would have brought them into Photoshop and would have adjusted the white balance there. Heck, a real professional would have carried a white card and would have done manual white balancing.
As for focus: that’s why professionals shoot 10x more photos. I was watching the real pros and their focus was just as bad as mine (it’s hard to get it right when shooting a 300 F2.8 wide open) but they shot so many, and kept checking to make sure they got good ones.
LikeLike
@11 actually no a pro or even a semi pro would have the proper wb set for the conditions. Very easy to do with a Nikon. Nikom has superb auto wb adjusemts. My D300 is virtually flawless in auto wb. So I must go back to blaming the photog not the camera
LikeLike
@11 actually no a pro or even a semi pro would have the proper wb set for the conditions. Very easy to do with a Nikon. Nikom has superb auto wb adjusemts. My D300 is virtually flawless in auto wb. So I must go back to blaming the photog not the camera
LikeLike
I noticed that photographing the person talking definitely does not make for the best shots. People pull weird faces when they talk. And they’re not still (if you’re doing it no-flash).
People listening are usually a much better source of portraits, in my opinion.
LikeLike
I noticed that photographing the person talking definitely does not make for the best shots. People pull weird faces when they talk. And they’re not still (if you’re doing it no-flash).
People listening are usually a much better source of portraits, in my opinion.
LikeLike
thanks very
LikeLike