Steve Jobs doesn’t think there’s anything cool being done in Java. At least that’s what he told Sun Microsystems’ CEO Jonathan Schwartz.
If I were Jonathan I’d pay John Poisson, CEO of Tiny Pictures to head over to Steve Jobs’ office and show him Radar.
This turns your camera phone into a social tool for sending fun stuff to your family. I got a demo a little while ago and it rocks.
Radar is sort of like Twitter (and we saw how popular that got in the past few weeks) but even better: it’s small photos for your friends. It’s getting very popular and I want it. But, the problem is I’m getting an iPhone and the iPhone doesn’t yet have a Java runtime (which Radar needs for its full-featured client — a lower quality WAP client is available, but it isn’t nearly as cool or useful).
Anyway, I’m noticing a trend here. The coolest stuff to come before my camera lately has been for mobile phones.
Maybe instead of Web 2.0 we should be talking about Mobile 2.0.
Norouz (Iranian New Year) starts at 5 p.m. Pacific Time. Maryam and family are preparing a feast. Happy Norouz to all the Iranians reading my blog.
OK, OK, I’m an arrogant a##h@@e. But, everytime I do a Google vs. Live search Google wins.
Here’s another one. I remember a few days ago someone on Twitter announced a Twitter search engine. I didn’t remember the URL, so I went to Google. Typed “Twitter search.”
Google came right back with the correct answer. And came back with the best blogs on the topic.
But, some people at Microsoft are saying that I’m being unfair to Microsoft. I really still do love Microsoft (and I still own stock in Microsoft, I don’t own stock in Google or Yahoo). So, I want them to do well.
But, I go over to Live.com and do the same search. The site I’m looking for is nowhere to be found. Even better, the first result brings back Google!
So, sorry, when I say Microsoft’s Internet execution sucks, this is what I’m talking about.
I wish Microsoft were better. I really do.
Oh, and Twitter Search is here.
UPDATE: Look at the advertising Microsoft is bringing back too. Microsoft is trying to raise its advertising revenues by showing non-relevant ads. That’ll hurt Microsoft long term cause anyone on Live will know the ads really have nothing to do with the search being done. Google’s approach will lead to more consistent advertising users. Advertising IS part of the search. Microsoft treats searchers as something to take advantage of, while Google puts far more relevant ads in front of a searcher, or none at all.