Flash on Firefox 2.0 beta hangs my machine

Oh, Mike Chambers over at Adobe has some fun at my expense. So, I thought I’d give Flash another try on Firefox. This time with Firefox 2.0 beta 1 release candidate that just came out. So far the License for Flash has hung my machine for more than five minutes. Here’s what my screen looks like.

This isn’t a good experience folks.

Regarding 1.0? Yeah, I finally did load it but it took a half dozen clicks and the EULA is pages long with language that normal people can’t understand (does anyone really read those things anyway?). If I was a normal person instead of a tech geek I’d say “screw this” and hit the back button.

But, I’m sure that I’ll get 60 more comments about how I’m an idiot instead of an engineer from Adobe saying “we got rid of the stupid EULA” or someone from the Firefox team saying “we just included Flash with our browser to make it easier on users (which would require Adobe to give up some of its rights, I guess).”

And, yes, since Mike made the point WMV really pisses me off on the Mac too which is why at Podtech I will try to not use it if at all possible.

Advertisements

73 thoughts on “Flash on Firefox 2.0 beta hangs my machine

  1. That Firefox and Flash issue is only on Vista. I noticed this as well. I had to use the flash exe installer to get it working. Also, I like WMV on Windows, and would not want quicktime…so at podtech you better offer WMV still!

    Like

  2. That Firefox and Flash issue is only on Vista. I noticed this as well. I had to use the flash exe installer to get it working. Also, I like WMV on Windows, and would not want quicktime…so at podtech you better offer WMV still!

    Like

  3. Robert, why that screenshoot looks like a bad resolution capture? Isn’t print-screen good enough?

    BTW: I can’t wait till browsers start supporting seriously: SVG

    Like

  4. Robert, why that screenshoot looks like a bad resolution capture? Isn’t print-screen good enough?

    BTW: I can’t wait till browsers start supporting seriously: SVG

    Like

  5. mini-d: that was probably my fault. I print screened, copied into Paint, then saved as GIF.

    Brandon, I’ll check out my XP box right now.

    Like

  6. mini-d: that was probably my fault. I print screened, copied into Paint, then saved as GIF.

    Brandon, I’ll check out my XP box right now.

    Like

  7. Robert: “beta” is a key word in your post too. Any beta product, be it from open source, microsoft, whoever, I tend to give the benefit of the doubt to. Doubly so when using a new product (flash 9) on a beta (firefox) running on another beta (vista).

    Like

  8. Robert: “beta” is a key word in your post too. Any beta product, be it from open source, microsoft, whoever, I tend to give the benefit of the doubt to. Doubly so when using a new product (flash 9) on a beta (firefox) running on another beta (vista).

    Like

  9. It’s just as bad on my XP box that has never had Firefox on it. It said “failed” after I got through the Flash download and install and Amanda’s site still said “plugin required.”

    The only way around this is a manual install.

    By the way, doing both required many, many clicks. I’m gonna do it again and count.

    Same behavior happens on the shipping version of Firefox, by the way.

    Like

  10. It’s just as bad on my XP box that has never had Firefox on it. It said “failed” after I got through the Flash download and install and Amanda’s site still said “plugin required.”

    The only way around this is a manual install.

    By the way, doing both required many, many clicks. I’m gonna do it again and count.

    Same behavior happens on the shipping version of Firefox, by the way.

    Like

  11. Ha, Robert, your talking about how bad a BETA of Firefox is…yet you constantly talk about how Windows Vista BETA 2 is so wonderful, and are quick to point out that it still is a BETA if something goes wrong.

    You’re so fucking biased, it’s unbelivable.

    Like

  12. Ha, Robert, your talking about how bad a BETA of Firefox is…yet you constantly talk about how Windows Vista BETA 2 is so wonderful, and are quick to point out that it still is a BETA if something goes wrong.

    You’re so fucking biased, it’s unbelivable.

    Like

  13. Cody: these comments aren’t aimed at Firefox, if you do some careful reading.

    And, I’ll have plenty to say about Vista. It’s slow. It has poor driver support. The UI isn’t finished. And application support isn’t very good.

    Like

  14. Cody: these comments aren’t aimed at Firefox, if you do some careful reading.

    And, I’ll have plenty to say about Vista. It’s slow. It has poor driver support. The UI isn’t finished. And application support isn’t very good.

    Like

  15. β€œwe got rid of the stupid EULA”?

    When have you ever used commercial software that didn’t have an EULA? Come on man, you’re starting to sound silly now.

    Like

  16. β€œwe got rid of the stupid EULA”?

    When have you ever used commercial software that didn’t have an EULA? Come on man, you’re starting to sound silly now.

    Like

  17. Whoa!!! Using bleeding edge builds and getting some erorrs? What a suprise. I’m assuming we’ll be seeing a post on how a lot of sites return error messages when I use IE 7 beta? The sites don’t even render, only give me an error message stating that I need to download the new version of IE. Lately I have been steering clear of a lot of beta and nightly builds and lo and behold I have a less hedaches.
    Take a step back and you’ll see the banality of the post.

    Like

  18. Whoa!!! Using bleeding edge builds and getting some erorrs? What a suprise. I’m assuming we’ll be seeing a post on how a lot of sites return error messages when I use IE 7 beta? The sites don’t even render, only give me an error message stating that I need to download the new version of IE. Lately I have been steering clear of a lot of beta and nightly builds and lo and behold I have a less hedaches.
    Take a step back and you’ll see the banality of the post.

    Like

  19. Don’t worry. The headaces of flash are well and good over on the Linux side of things, too. We have an outdated version that can’t be shipped with most distros because of the license. And did I mention the installer wants to be used from the command line? We’ve only had the Loki graphical installers for what, 8 years now?

    Like

  20. Don’t worry. The headaces of flash are well and good over on the Linux side of things, too. We have an outdated version that can’t be shipped with most distros because of the license. And did I mention the installer wants to be used from the command line? We’ve only had the Loki graphical installers for what, 8 years now?

    Like

  21. Cali: Not in this case. Robert’s talking about Flash 9, for which Adobe did not initially ship a universal binary. I called them out on it here: http://www.richbrownell.com/page.php?id=236 and they quickly got back to me so I updated: http://www.richbrownell.com/page.php?id=237

    And to Robert again: if there is a problem with Flash, I’m sure it’ll have a fix soon. Adobe released new Flash, Flex, and ColdFusion all on the same day, so they have a lot to deal with.

    Like

  22. Cali: Not in this case. Robert’s talking about Flash 9, for which Adobe did not initially ship a universal binary. I called them out on it here: http://www.richbrownell.com/page.php?id=236 and they quickly got back to me so I updated: http://www.richbrownell.com/page.php?id=237

    And to Robert again: if there is a problem with Flash, I’m sure it’ll have a fix soon. Adobe released new Flash, Flex, and ColdFusion all on the same day, so they have a lot to deal with.

    Like

  23. If the flash plugin is given away free to everyone, why don’t Adobe open source it? Then it could be included inside Firefox like any other regular tag.

    Am I missing something basic here?

    I’d like to see 2 versions of the firefox install, one for techies which is just firefox, and one for the rest of the world (me included) that installs every fucking extension I need, Flash, Shockwave, Quicktime and all the media playing stuff, everything baby.

    I still haven’t been able to get Quicktime to work on my PC, and I’ve been using browsers since Mosaic. Does this make Apple suck?

    BTW I love Firefox, it made MS up their game. Win win for everyone πŸ™‚

    monk.e.boy

    Like

  24. If the flash plugin is given away free to everyone, why don’t Adobe open source it? Then it could be included inside Firefox like any other regular tag.

    Am I missing something basic here?

    I’d like to see 2 versions of the firefox install, one for techies which is just firefox, and one for the rest of the world (me included) that installs every fucking extension I need, Flash, Shockwave, Quicktime and all the media playing stuff, everything baby.

    I still haven’t been able to get Quicktime to work on my PC, and I’ve been using browsers since Mosaic. Does this make Apple suck?

    BTW I love Firefox, it made MS up their game. Win win for everyone πŸ™‚

    monk.e.boy

    Like

  25. The difference between Vista, IE 7 and Firefox is that Firefox is “release candidate 1” – as in ready for release.

    Like

  26. The difference between Vista, IE 7 and Firefox is that Firefox is “release candidate 1” – as in ready for release.

    Like

  27. Many times when viewing Flash on Firefox 1.5 running on Windows XP, it starts using 100% of my processor and so I have to give it an end task. My guess is that you’re experiencing the same problem because of the same bug they haven’t fixed since 1.5 (or maybe even earlier).

    Like

  28. Many times when viewing Flash on Firefox 1.5 running on Windows XP, it starts using 100% of my processor and so I have to give it an end task. My guess is that you’re experiencing the same problem because of the same bug they haven’t fixed since 1.5 (or maybe even earlier).

    Like

  29. I always use EULAlyzer from javacool to help me with EULA’s. Just point it at the EULA box in the software you are installing and it will help analyse the EULA by pointing out the sections of interest (for instance third party tools or licences, or “without notice”,…) and assigning a level of interest to them.
    Free download from http://www.javacoolsoftware.com/eulalyzer.html
    It saves a lot of time when reading EULA’s, since it makes one focus on the sections that are of importance. I hope you can find it useful as well.

    Like

  30. I always use EULAlyzer from javacool to help me with EULA’s. Just point it at the EULA box in the software you are installing and it will help analyse the EULA by pointing out the sections of interest (for instance third party tools or licences, or “without notice”,…) and assigning a level of interest to them.
    Free download from http://www.javacoolsoftware.com/eulalyzer.html
    It saves a lot of time when reading EULA’s, since it makes one focus on the sections that are of importance. I hope you can find it useful as well.

    Like

  31. Comment on the screen shot, there’s a screen clipping tool in Vista that will allow you to save a screen shot as jpeg. Unless I’m mistaken, it should be under accessories.

    Like

  32. Comment on the screen shot, there’s a screen clipping tool in Vista that will allow you to save a screen shot as jpeg. Unless I’m mistaken, it should be under accessories.

    Like

  33. “the EULA is pages long with language that normal people can’t understand (does anyone really read those things anyway?). If I was a normal person instead of a tech geek I’d say β€œscrew this” and hit the back button.”

    That’s not true and you know it. The “normal person” will not read it, but *will* click ok to continue. If that wasn’t the case, noone would upgrade Windows either… and remember how long the EULA you have to accept in Windows Update for that wmf or jpg bug fix is, btw? It’s not to shabby either…

    Like

  34. “the EULA is pages long with language that normal people can’t understand (does anyone really read those things anyway?). If I was a normal person instead of a tech geek I’d say β€œscrew this” and hit the back button.”

    That’s not true and you know it. The “normal person” will not read it, but *will* click ok to continue. If that wasn’t the case, noone would upgrade Windows either… and remember how long the EULA you have to accept in Windows Update for that wmf or jpg bug fix is, btw? It’s not to shabby either…

    Like

  35. More on “codec silos” … we are thinking about short term user issues (installation) but we should also keep in mind the longer term issues if any one vendor makes it so easy that they force a lock-in on their proprietary format.

    I think that our only hope is for Apple and RealNetworks to create a completely interoperable IPTV stack based upon the MPEG LA standard of H264 in MP4 or 3GP over RTSP or HTTP. We need two strong vendors to drive this effort together. When this happens Microsoft will eventually be forced to add this standard IPTV support to their media player and then we will have a good solution that will work out of the box for most consumers regardless of OS and browser or device.

    If Microsoft just simply added support for ISMA standard MPEG4 codecs and formats these problems would go away for consumers. It is amazing that they have to push Windows Media format at the exclusion of the standard rather than letting it compete on its technical merits. Adopting standards would really improve the consumer experience with MS products. They are holding back the general IPTV industry with these practices.

    I have a longer post on “codec silos” here: http://podslug.com/blog/?p=32

    Like

  36. More on “codec silos” … we are thinking about short term user issues (installation) but we should also keep in mind the longer term issues if any one vendor makes it so easy that they force a lock-in on their proprietary format.

    I think that our only hope is for Apple and RealNetworks to create a completely interoperable IPTV stack based upon the MPEG LA standard of H264 in MP4 or 3GP over RTSP or HTTP. We need two strong vendors to drive this effort together. When this happens Microsoft will eventually be forced to add this standard IPTV support to their media player and then we will have a good solution that will work out of the box for most consumers regardless of OS and browser or device.

    If Microsoft just simply added support for ISMA standard MPEG4 codecs and formats these problems would go away for consumers. It is amazing that they have to push Windows Media format at the exclusion of the standard rather than letting it compete on its technical merits. Adopting standards would really improve the consumer experience with MS products. They are holding back the general IPTV industry with these practices.

    I have a longer post on “codec silos” here: http://podslug.com/blog/?p=32

    Like

  37. “The difference between Vista, IE 7 and Firefox is that Firefox is β€œrelease candidate 1β€³ – as in ready for release.”

    That’s bullshit, Jarred. Firefox 2 isn’t even beta yet. It will be in a week or two.

    Like

  38. “The difference between Vista, IE 7 and Firefox is that Firefox is β€œrelease candidate 1β€³ – as in ready for release.”

    That’s bullshit, Jarred. Firefox 2 isn’t even beta yet. It will be in a week or two.

    Like

  39. “And, I’ll have plenty to say about Vista. It’s slow. It has poor driver support. The UI isn’t finished. And application support isn’t very good.”

    You saw it here first:

    Robert Scoble gives his first “I wouldn’t have said it this harshly when I was a Microsoft employee” piece of post-Microsoft perspective-tude.

    Micosoft defenders, please start your engines.

    Robert, you are so0o0o0 in a new world.

    “Hey, what’s different? He used to regularly criticise Microsoft on some stuff but say PR-friendly things about other Microsoft stuff”.

    Yeah, but this latest stuff seems kind of, er, less subtle, less guarded, no?

    Like

  40. “And, I’ll have plenty to say about Vista. It’s slow. It has poor driver support. The UI isn’t finished. And application support isn’t very good.”

    You saw it here first:

    Robert Scoble gives his first “I wouldn’t have said it this harshly when I was a Microsoft employee” piece of post-Microsoft perspective-tude.

    Micosoft defenders, please start your engines.

    Robert, you are so0o0o0 in a new world.

    “Hey, what’s different? He used to regularly criticise Microsoft on some stuff but say PR-friendly things about other Microsoft stuff”.

    Yeah, but this latest stuff seems kind of, er, less subtle, less guarded, no?

    Like

  41. Ricky: absolutely! But on the other hand you’ll believe me when I say something nice about Vista too and there IS a lot nice to say about it.

    Like

  42. Ricky: absolutely! But on the other hand you’ll believe me when I say something nice about Vista too and there IS a lot nice to say about it.

    Like

  43. I used to love Flash and tout it as a solution to video compatibility problems across platforms… but I’m becoming less and less a fan, after running into problems with it in Firefox on Ubuntu 6.06. Although, in this case, WMV is certainly not a solution, nor is Quicktime.

    Nice to know it isn’t just linux users having problems with Flash, though.

    Like

  44. I used to love Flash and tout it as a solution to video compatibility problems across platforms… but I’m becoming less and less a fan, after running into problems with it in Firefox on Ubuntu 6.06. Although, in this case, WMV is certainly not a solution, nor is Quicktime.

    Nice to know it isn’t just linux users having problems with Flash, though.

    Like

  45. The difference is that now Scoble is SECRETLY on MS’s pay. So the next post will be about Vista’s new graphics sub-system that’s going to kill Flash. You see, it’s less obvious now and everything…

    πŸ˜‰

    Like

  46. The difference is that now Scoble is SECRETLY on MS’s pay. So the next post will be about Vista’s new graphics sub-system that’s going to kill Flash. You see, it’s less obvious now and everything…

    πŸ˜‰

    Like

  47. Naaa, wmv is not evil on the Mac, that’s what we have flip4mac for. It’s evil on Linux! This is where mp4 really shines. So far it seems to play on anything, mobile phones, media players, games consoles and even computers ^_^

    Like

  48. Naaa, wmv is not evil on the Mac, that’s what we have flip4mac for. It’s evil on Linux! This is where mp4 really shines. So far it seems to play on anything, mobile phones, media players, games consoles and even computers ^_^

    Like

  49. That’s because you use a PC! It took less than 3 minutes to install Flash Player 9 [beta] and a few minutes to use Firefox 2.0 b1!!! PCs suck! Macs are faster!!! PCs stole the interface, and they suck!!!

    Like

  50. That’s because you use a PC! It took less than 3 minutes to install Flash Player 9 [beta] and a few minutes to use Firefox 2.0 b1!!! PCs suck! Macs are faster!!! PCs stole the interface, and they suck!!!

    Like

  51. I think your just being rejected by the Flash installer based on your pure ignorance… you should put your machine back in the box and send it back.. leave technology alone, it doesn’t appear to be your strong suite

    Like

  52. I think your just being rejected by the Flash installer based on your pure ignorance… you should put your machine back in the box and send it back.. leave technology alone, it doesn’t appear to be your strong suite

    Like

  53. Myspace switched to Flash 9 for their embedded videos just recently and everyone that I know running on Windows (its NOT JUST Vista) and Firefox 1.5 has the problem with some Flash files. My friend uses Swishmax and they added a few patches because the new Flash has dropped support for older coding I believe or something similar…

    I blame Adobe as well as those twits like Myspace who always HAVE to have the latest version of a plugin (Myspace claims they switched so quickly to Flash 9 because it offered less security holes than the previous version…)

    The makers of Swish have reacted quickly to their communities needs. Let’s see how many months it will take for something to be done to this Flash piece og crap…

    Like

  54. Myspace switched to Flash 9 for their embedded videos just recently and everyone that I know running on Windows (its NOT JUST Vista) and Firefox 1.5 has the problem with some Flash files. My friend uses Swishmax and they added a few patches because the new Flash has dropped support for older coding I believe or something similar…

    I blame Adobe as well as those twits like Myspace who always HAVE to have the latest version of a plugin (Myspace claims they switched so quickly to Flash 9 because it offered less security holes than the previous version…)

    The makers of Swish have reacted quickly to their communities needs. Let’s see how many months it will take for something to be done to this Flash piece og crap…

    Like

  55. Scoble, many have pointed out that you are running beta on beta so no surprise there. What most have left out is the simple fact that THIS IS NOT A FLASH ISSUE! Firefox hangs on loading a EULA. Is that Firefox or the vendor? Blame it on Adobe, their site, or Firefox but not the plugin.

    I HIGHLY doubt you would have created this post had you not received a hefty amount of blasting on your last “Flash Bash” post (http://scobleizer.wordpress.com/2006/07/05/why-i-dont-use-flash/). At least you wouldn’t have pointed it at Flash. You would’ve either left it alone, bashed Adobe, or bashed Firefox.

    As a side note, Flock wouldn’t install Flash either. It wasn’t Flash’s fault. Flock was an early beta release and I was on a buggy Vista release. πŸ™‚

    It is all about approach. πŸ˜‰

    Like

  56. Scoble, many have pointed out that you are running beta on beta so no surprise there. What most have left out is the simple fact that THIS IS NOT A FLASH ISSUE! Firefox hangs on loading a EULA. Is that Firefox or the vendor? Blame it on Adobe, their site, or Firefox but not the plugin.

    I HIGHLY doubt you would have created this post had you not received a hefty amount of blasting on your last “Flash Bash” post (http://scobleizer.wordpress.com/2006/07/05/why-i-dont-use-flash/). At least you wouldn’t have pointed it at Flash. You would’ve either left it alone, bashed Adobe, or bashed Firefox.

    As a side note, Flock wouldn’t install Flash either. It wasn’t Flash’s fault. Flock was an early beta release and I was on a buggy Vista release. πŸ™‚

    It is all about approach. πŸ˜‰

    Like

Comments are closed.