Scoble’s a hypocrite, PR blogger says

David Krug who writes the PR Blogging blog says that he’s unsubscribing and that I’m a hypocrite for my stance on advertising and conflicts of interest. Here, let’s listen into what he’s saying:

Scoble says bloggers shouldn’t be getting paid to blog. Cough, I swear Microsoft was paying him to video blog this entire year. I may be mistaken. Someone might want to correct me. What’s the difference? No seriously if Scoble can come up with a decent reason to differentiate the two I will listen.”

First of all, I didn’t say that you shouldn’t be getting paid to blog. I said that if you are you should disclose that fact. Yes, I did say that I wouldn’t sell my blog on a post-by-post basis, but didn’t get to the point for making that rule for everyone. I just said that if I WERE going to sell my posts that I would disclose that and make it clear for my readers (and the same goes for where I work — everyone knew Channel 9 was paid for by Microsoft).

Everyone knew I worked for Microsoft and so everything I wrote over the past three years should be looked at through that lens.

What I hate are bloggers who are being compensated but aren’t telling their readers about their conflicts of interest.

There’s a huge difference there and I think it says a LOT about David that he can’t see the difference.

It’s also interesting to note that for the past three years my posts where I said something nice about our competitors or other companies that I was listened to a lot more than when I said something nice about Microsoft. Why was that? Because my readers were factoring into their reading how I was being compensated.

Same thing will happen now when I say something nice about PodTech. You all know that I’m getting my salary there and will be far more likely to say “shill” when I do that about PodTech.

More about this in my exit interview.

Advertisements

14 thoughts on “Scoble’s a hypocrite, PR blogger says

  1. See the plain issue here is. Leave it up to bloggers to disclose. Don’t bash the service Robert. In fact don’t prejudge bloggers. It’s just ugly.

    IMO there’s no difference between an affiliate link and a payperpost situation.

    As long as you proclaim it.

    But don’t bash bloggers because they use a service. Or a service because it uses bloggers.

    That’s the issue I have. I can see the difference here. DOH! But It’s hypocritical to label all bloggers who use the service as sleezy. Which you hint strongly at.

    Which is why I had a strong post.

    Like

  2. See the plain issue here is. Leave it up to bloggers to disclose. Don’t bash the service Robert. In fact don’t prejudge bloggers. It’s just ugly.

    IMO there’s no difference between an affiliate link and a payperpost situation.

    As long as you proclaim it.

    But don’t bash bloggers because they use a service. Or a service because it uses bloggers.

    That’s the issue I have. I can see the difference here. DOH! But It’s hypocritical to label all bloggers who use the service as sleezy. Which you hint strongly at.

    Which is why I had a strong post.

    Like

  3. David it seems like your putting words in Robert’s mouth. After re-reading the post I don’t see how Robert’s bashing bloggers or the service.. in my opinion he’s saying there needs to be some ethical standards in blogging. If you’ve got a paid post, disclose it. Easy. End of story.

    Like

  4. David it seems like your putting words in Robert’s mouth. After re-reading the post I don’t see how Robert’s bashing bloggers or the service.. in my opinion he’s saying there needs to be some ethical standards in blogging. If you’ve got a paid post, disclose it. Easy. End of story.

    Like

  5. So ….
    How much did David Krug get paid for that post???

    Once you affiliate with a pay for endorsement “business” you never get rid of the stain?

    Like

  6. I think Scobel’s post are only one part of this blog, I come here to read the comments more than the original post-so should the commentors get paid too?:)

    To be fair, Scobel allowed a decent amount of critism on the blog, this is what really raised his credibility comparing to other “bloggers/bloggals” working for the Microsoft PR/HR department.

    We sure don’t need too many shillbloggers in the cyberspace, do we?

    Like

  7. I think Scobel’s post are only one part of this blog, I come here to read the comments more than the original post-so should the commentors get paid too?:)

    To be fair, Scobel allowed a decent amount of critism on the blog, this is what really raised his credibility comparing to other “bloggers/bloggals” working for the Microsoft PR/HR department.

    We sure don’t need too many shillbloggers in the cyberspace, do we?

    Like

Comments are closed.