In the discussion it was clear that there is a coming conflict between people who "do it for love" and those who are doing video to build an audience, which presumably they are doing so that they can sell advertising or get sponsorship. In other words there are those who believe in production values and those who think that the production values advocates are missing the point: that everyday people can now use video to communicate in a new way.
It's interesting, but at Microsoft the Channel 9 team built an audience without doing much production. Very little editing. Very little enhancing of audio. Very little audio beyond just using the on-camera microphones. Most of my video was shot on cheapo cameras.
It's interesting that they didn't discuss why that worked: we're tired of committee-based marketing.
Look at a typical Superbowl Commercial. I'd bet that to do one of those requires at least three committees.
So what that my audio wasn't the ultimate 5-channel surround sound that the World Cup has? Or that my camera work is a bit shaky at times? I didn't do it to win an Emmy: I did it to get you a look inside Microsoft offices in a way that'd be impossible to do if we had "production values."
Why? Production values require committees, or at least a lot of time and money. Committees generally strip the soul out of things. It's why we end up with names like "Windows XP Tablet PC Edition 2005." Or worse.
Dave Winer made the point that by making it seem like you need to spend eight hours to do a few minutes of video that you're scaring off just the people who'll come up with something innovative. He said he doesn't do that and he has an audience of thousands who watch and listen to his various vlogs and podcasts.
That is so true.
Why do I like videoblogs? Cause I don't need to pitch a committee to get them distributed. That's a huge change.
Yeah, it means that there will be a ton of video that you won't want to watch. That's OK!
We have plenty of "professional" content out there. There's 150 channels on my Comcast and nothing is on.
Now I'll have 150,000 videoblogs a day to choose from. I'm sure that the really good ones will get pointed out.
I'm actually probably going to get two cameras: a cheap one and an expensive one. There's some content that just requires a better quality. But there's a whole lot of things that I'd like to do that doesn't require hours of sitting in front of an editor, or a $6,000 camcorder with a $600 tripod.
I give you a front-row seat on the future. Focusing most of my efforts now on next-generation augmented reality and artificial intelligence, AKA "mixed reality."
SUBSCRIBE TO MY NEWSLETTER: http://clevermoe.com/scobleizer-news/
BUY OUR NEW BOOK: https://www.amazon.com/Fourth-Transformation-Robert-Scoble/dp/1539894444 "The Fourth Transformation: How augmented reality and artificial intelligence will change everything."
WATCH MY LATEST SPEECHES:
State of VR with Philip Rosedale (done in VR itself, very cool): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2zAA1EVGUZU
At GEOINT, June 2017: http://trajectorymagazine.com/glimpse-new-world/
Augmented World Expo, June 2017: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l4xHILvLD8E
At Leade.rs, April 2017: https://youtu.be/52_0JshgjXI
+++++++++++
BIO:
Scoble gives you a front-row seat on the future.
Literally. He had the first ride in the first Tesla. Siri was launched in his house. He's been the first to share all sorts of technologies and companies with you, from Flipboard to Pandora to Instagram.
Today he's focusing on mixed reality, AKA "next-generation augmented reality" which will include a new user interface for EVERYTHING in your life (IoT, Smart Cities, driverless cars, robots, drones, etc).
That's based on his view thanks to his past experience as futurist at Rackspace.
Best place to find Scoble? On his Facebook profile at https://www.facebook.com/RobertScoble
He has been a technology blogger since 2000, was one of five people who built Microsoft's Channel 9 video blog/community, worked at Fast Company Magazine running its TV efforts, and has been part of technology media businesses since 1993.
++++++++
SPEAKER PITCH:
Apple and Facebook now have revealed their Augmented Reality strategies, which means your business needs one too. Rely on Robert Scoble, the world's top authority on AR, to bring to your conference what businesses should do next.
SPEECH ABSTRACT #1:
TITLE: The Fourth Transformation: What's next in mixed reality (AR and AI) and the future of technology?
Here's an example of this talk at Leade.rs in Paris in April, 2017: https://youtu.be/52_0JshgjXI
Why "the Fourth Transformation?"
Soon we will have phones and glasses that do full on augmented reality. Everything you look at will potentially be augmented. This world is coming in late 2017 with a new iPhone from Apple, amongst other products. Microsoft is betting everything on its HoloLens glasses that do mixed reality and the industry is spending many billions of dollars in R&D and funding new companies like Magic Leap.
This future will be the user interface for IoT, Smart Cities, autonomous cars, robots, drones, and your TV.
This is a big deal and Robert will take you through what mixed reality is and how it will change every business.
Learn more about Robert's speaking style and contact his agent at http://odemanagement.com/robert-scoble/Robert-Scoble.html
++++++++
SPEECH ABSTRACT #2:
"The Next Two Clicks of Moore's Law."
Over the next four years, or two clicks of Moore's Law, a ton about our technology world will change. Scoble will bring you the best from his travels visiting R&D labs, startups, and innovators around the world.
He views the world through his rose-colored-mixed-reality glasses, which will be the new user interface for self driving cars, Smart Cities, IoT, and many other things in our world.
He'll send you off with some lessons for companies both large and small.
++++++++
SPEECH ABSTRACT #3:
"Personalized Meaning: What is Augmented Reality For?"
As we enter a far more technological world where even cars drive themselves, I predict we'll see a blowback toward the analog, more authentic world.
What role does augmented reality play in both worlds?
Get Scoble's insight into where augmented reality is going, see tons of real-world demos, and understand what he means by 'personalized meaning.'
CONTACT:
If you are looking to contact me, email is best: scobleizer@gmail.com.
++++++++
ENDORSEMENTS:
IZEA Top 25 Tech Influencers: https://izea.com/2017/07/07/25-top-tech-influencers/
Time: One of the top 140 Twitterers!
FT: One of the five most influential Twitterers!
Inc. Top 5 on list of Tech Power Players You Need to Know: http://www.inc.com/john-rampton/30-power-players-in-tech-you-need-to-know.html
Next Reality: #4 on top 50 AR influencer list: https://next.reality.news/news/nr50-next-realitys-50-people-watch-augmented-mixed-reality-0177454/
View all posts by Robert Scoble
Published
73 thoughts on “Production values debate breaks out during videologger session”
The problem I see with the “grassroots people” is that they wear their poor production values as a badge of honor — so they are *misssing* the point of podcasting, blogging, vlogging, etc.
The point is the CONTENT, not the production values. Wait, does it sound like I’m switching gears? No, the content is king, but poor production values can get in the way of the message.
Poor production shouldn’t stop you from doing your thing, but it’s not something to which you should aspire (unspire?). In general, the better your production values, the easier it is for people to get the message — and that’s the most important thing, isn’t it?
The problem I see with the “grassroots people” is that they wear their poor production values as a badge of honor — so they are *misssing* the point of podcasting, blogging, vlogging, etc.
The point is the CONTENT, not the production values. Wait, does it sound like I’m switching gears? No, the content is king, but poor production values can get in the way of the message.
Poor production shouldn’t stop you from doing your thing, but it’s not something to which you should aspire (unspire?). In general, the better your production values, the easier it is for people to get the message — and that’s the most important thing, isn’t it?
Jay: I agree. But there’s a lot of things that can be communicated without spending the time on the camera, the audio, the editing.
Yeah, it can always be made better. But, watch this video of Emma and her mom. http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6642002519086292079 It’s horrible. If you look at it that way. But to her family? I’ll bet it’s precious and I bet they don’t really care that it was a shaky camera, with audio that could have been better, with lighting that sucked.
Not everything has to look like a Superbowl commercial. And that’s why I love this new medium.
Jay: I agree. But there’s a lot of things that can be communicated without spending the time on the camera, the audio, the editing.
Yeah, it can always be made better. But, watch this video of Emma and her mom. http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6642002519086292079 It’s horrible. If you look at it that way. But to her family? I’ll bet it’s precious and I bet they don’t really care that it was a shaky camera, with audio that could have been better, with lighting that sucked.
Not everything has to look like a Superbowl commercial. And that’s why I love this new medium.
I agree with you Robert. Here quality of the production is not the issue. THe main issue is do people like it or not and are people interested to spend some time from their every day life or not. Video blogs will gain a momentum within just 2 years when millions and may be nearly one billion users from Asia and Africa get connected to high speed internet. The market is going to increase mutlifuld with in just 2-3 years.
I agree with you Robert. Here quality of the production is not the issue. THe main issue is do people like it or not and are people interested to spend some time from their every day life or not. Video blogs will gain a momentum within just 2 years when millions and may be nearly one billion users from Asia and Africa get connected to high speed internet. The market is going to increase mutlifuld with in just 2-3 years.
Take a look at audio podcasting, which has already matured more fully than vlogging. Trust me: production values matter. It’s the values that may have changed, though. Authenticity is important, and you simply don’t *want* to sound like a commercial radio DJ. But you should balance out your volumes, for example – when I’m listening to interviews on my bike and I can’t hear one of the two persons talking because of the volume differences, I unsubscribe.
Take a look at audio podcasting, which has already matured more fully than vlogging. Trust me: production values matter. It’s the values that may have changed, though. Authenticity is important, and you simply don’t *want* to sound like a commercial radio DJ. But you should balance out your volumes, for example – when I’m listening to interviews on my bike and I can’t hear one of the two persons talking because of the volume differences, I unsubscribe.
OK, is accessibility a “production value”? Microsoft has more money than God, yet the entirety of Channel 9 is, for example, uncaptioned. Oh, but that might interfere with your *immediacy*, I suppose.
OK, is accessibility a “production value”? Microsoft has more money than God, yet the entirety of Channel 9 is, for example, uncaptioned. Oh, but that might interfere with your *immediacy*, I suppose.
Joe do you do video? Have you ever done captions? It’s very expensive and time consuming, yes. Maybe Microsoft could afford it (but then why couldn’t they pay me more than $100,000) but certainly there’s a whole raft of people out there who can’t pay around $300 a video or podcast to get transcripts done.
Joe do you do video? Have you ever done captions? It’s very expensive and time consuming, yes. Maybe Microsoft could afford it (but then why couldn’t they pay me more than $100,000) but certainly there’s a whole raft of people out there who can’t pay around $300 a video or podcast to get transcripts done.
I feel like this debate (and the similar podcasting debate) is being phrased in terms that make it very difficult to solve.
Can you be a podcaster or vlogger (I hate that word) with poor production qualities?
Can you be a blogger who can’t spell or punctuate?
Of course. Will you be a better blogger, podcaster, or vlogger when you have a greater command of the medium? All other things equal, yes.
Dave has a ton of people who listen to his podcast… not because of it’s poor production values but INSPITE OF IT. There are plenty of people (like me) who do not listen because of the dead air (etc).
Would Dave have more listeners if he did a little editing? I think so. At least one more.
To me it seems like the issue is more that podcasters and vloggers are either too lazy to do some editing (which may be fine, depending on their audience) or they don’t know how, so instead of learning they prefer to jump up on a soapbox about how it’s unimportant.
Sure, sure, there’s a law of diminishing returns… how many more listeners/viewers does that extra hour of production work get you?
But it seems counter-intuitive to suggest that having a more watchable/listenable show is going to hurt you.
I feel like this debate (and the similar podcasting debate) is being phrased in terms that make it very difficult to solve.
Can you be a podcaster or vlogger (I hate that word) with poor production qualities?
Can you be a blogger who can’t spell or punctuate?
Of course. Will you be a better blogger, podcaster, or vlogger when you have a greater command of the medium? All other things equal, yes.
Dave has a ton of people who listen to his podcast… not because of it’s poor production values but INSPITE OF IT. There are plenty of people (like me) who do not listen because of the dead air (etc).
Would Dave have more listeners if he did a little editing? I think so. At least one more.
To me it seems like the issue is more that podcasters and vloggers are either too lazy to do some editing (which may be fine, depending on their audience) or they don’t know how, so instead of learning they prefer to jump up on a soapbox about how it’s unimportant.
Sure, sure, there’s a law of diminishing returns… how many more listeners/viewers does that extra hour of production work get you?
But it seems counter-intuitive to suggest that having a more watchable/listenable show is going to hurt you.
I’m with you 100% on this buddy. And the example I’ve often used is to point to hollywood. Nine times out of ten I’d rather watch a film with a great story but basic production values over… the latest Michael Bay film (whatever that happens to be). And let’s face it – the reason podcasting has exploded isn’t because we were all sitting home thinking “gee the production values on mainstream media plain suck”. It was a lack of interesting content. Now, since I started G’Day World a couple of years ago I’ve upgraded my mic from the $20 headset to something that cost me slightly more… and I bought some additional equipment as well. But mainly because it saves me significant post-production time (GIGO). Someone told me recently how Rocketboom’s success has to do with the fact they shoot it (apparently) on HD. I told him I couldn’t tell the difference on my iPod.
I’m with you 100% on this buddy. And the example I’ve often used is to point to hollywood. Nine times out of ten I’d rather watch a film with a great story but basic production values over… the latest Michael Bay film (whatever that happens to be). And let’s face it – the reason podcasting has exploded isn’t because we were all sitting home thinking “gee the production values on mainstream media plain suck”. It was a lack of interesting content. Now, since I started G’Day World a couple of years ago I’ve upgraded my mic from the $20 headset to something that cost me slightly more… and I bought some additional equipment as well. But mainly because it saves me significant post-production time (GIGO). Someone told me recently how Rocketboom’s success has to do with the fact they shoot it (apparently) on HD. I told him I couldn’t tell the difference on my iPod.
Saying production values don’t matter in video is like saying good writing doesn’t matter in an article or an essay. No matter the medium, you need to be articulate.
What so-called videoblogging is doing is recreating cable access crap on an extremely large scale. Nothing on the 150 professional cable channels? Great. Now you’ve got 150,000 cable access shows to choose from.
Saying production values don’t matter in video is like saying good writing doesn’t matter in an article or an essay. No matter the medium, you need to be articulate.
What so-called videoblogging is doing is recreating cable access crap on an extremely large scale. Nothing on the 150 professional cable channels? Great. Now you’ve got 150,000 cable access shows to choose from.
Take a moment to consider audio quality from the perspective of the listener. What do podcasts give me? Choice. I can choose from a world full of content – and I can choose when and where I want to consume it.
Unfortunately, “when and where” is most often while driving, on public transport, or walking noisy streets. And if I can’t hear it, I exercise my choice: “Next!”
It’s not about being “fancy”. If I can’t hear your podcast, I won’t cry over it. There is more quality content out there than I can ever hope to consume. “Next!”
Take a moment to consider audio quality from the perspective of the listener. What do podcasts give me? Choice. I can choose from a world full of content – and I can choose when and where I want to consume it.
Unfortunately, “when and where” is most often while driving, on public transport, or walking noisy streets. And if I can’t hear it, I exercise my choice: “Next!”
It’s not about being “fancy”. If I can’t hear your podcast, I won’t cry over it. There is more quality content out there than I can ever hope to consume. “Next!”
Rebort: sorry, you’re missing what’s going on here. Emma’s parents would never have been able to get her on a cable access channel. This is much deeper and broader than that. Not to mention that I don’t have a cable access channel to distribute my crap on.
Rebort: sorry, you’re missing what’s going on here. Emma’s parents would never have been able to get her on a cable access channel. This is much deeper and broader than that. Not to mention that I don’t have a cable access channel to distribute my crap on.
Not always…and usually only with dsyfunctional organizations (not much a surprise at Microsoft).
Production values require TALENT and know-how.
I turn my Events/Weddings/Bar and Bat Mitzvahs/Corporate Marketing Rot shoots into works of Hollywood art, and I am only one person out of two. And I do it fast too, (thanks Ultimate S 2). All Hail Douglas Spotted Eagle (my guru of sorts).
Poor quality only means poor quality. You can blog without knowing how to write. You can vblog without knowing the basics of production, handheld shaky cam with bad audio in tow. Heck, freedom. But the better you write, and the better your production values the more attention you will get. Quite simple, yes?
Channel 9 is niche. Some lower two-thirds, some serious editing, with some DECENT audio, and narrational VO’s, with a Steadicam feel…well you might have gotten MORE of an audience. I could have turned that place around, single-handedly, and that’s no idle boast.
Your on10 is much better, but then it’s headachey MTV jump-cut short attention span, pointless stupid geek tricks bugs me to no end, makes my teeth hurt. But then I am not the target audience, so can’t fault them for ‘style’.
Nothing WRONG with the smallish Indy’s taking on Hollywood if you will, but the first and foremost consideration is always (and will always be) quality.
Not always…and usually only with dsyfunctional organizations (not much a surprise at Microsoft).
Production values require TALENT and know-how.
I turn my Events/Weddings/Bar and Bat Mitzvahs/Corporate Marketing Rot shoots into works of Hollywood art, and I am only one person out of two. And I do it fast too, (thanks Ultimate S 2). All Hail Douglas Spotted Eagle (my guru of sorts).
Poor quality only means poor quality. You can blog without knowing how to write. You can vblog without knowing the basics of production, handheld shaky cam with bad audio in tow. Heck, freedom. But the better you write, and the better your production values the more attention you will get. Quite simple, yes?
Channel 9 is niche. Some lower two-thirds, some serious editing, with some DECENT audio, and narrational VO’s, with a Steadicam feel…well you might have gotten MORE of an audience. I could have turned that place around, single-handedly, and that’s no idle boast.
Your on10 is much better, but then it’s headachey MTV jump-cut short attention span, pointless stupid geek tricks bugs me to no end, makes my teeth hurt. But then I am not the target audience, so can’t fault them for ‘style’.
Nothing WRONG with the smallish Indy’s taking on Hollywood if you will, but the first and foremost consideration is always (and will always be) quality.
Still harping on the $100,000 salary issue? Are you really that bitter about it? I guess we now know for sure why you left. You were there 3 years? Obviously then, MS didn’t see the value it got from your Channel 9 duties and your off hours blogging to put a “face on Microsoft” as being worth more than $100,000 to them. Which is a very interesting commentary when you place it up against your perceived worth to MS.
As for the “production” issue. Well, on the one hand I guess al-Queda is able to get its point across with low-quality videos. (Nick Berg, etc). Is that the level you are aspiring to? I’m not sure “committees” are required for good, high quality production videos. Spielberg was able to turn our some pretty good stuff while he was in film school. I don’think he had a committee for that.
You’re fooling yourself if you think quality doesn’t matter, particulary if you want to be making money at the end of the day. Your message will get lost in the distraction of the poor quality as people will be focused on how horrible the production is. Now if you want to be a parody of yourself and people watch and listen BECAUSE of how horrible it is, I guess that could be good entertainment value. Sort of like the old SCTV show. That might work. I don’t think that is what you are going for, though. How much extra work does it take to make sure you are well editied and well scripted? Sounds like you don’t want to put in the effort.
Still harping on the $100,000 salary issue? Are you really that bitter about it? I guess we now know for sure why you left. You were there 3 years? Obviously then, MS didn’t see the value it got from your Channel 9 duties and your off hours blogging to put a “face on Microsoft” as being worth more than $100,000 to them. Which is a very interesting commentary when you place it up against your perceived worth to MS.
As for the “production” issue. Well, on the one hand I guess al-Queda is able to get its point across with low-quality videos. (Nick Berg, etc). Is that the level you are aspiring to? I’m not sure “committees” are required for good, high quality production videos. Spielberg was able to turn our some pretty good stuff while he was in film school. I don’think he had a committee for that.
You’re fooling yourself if you think quality doesn’t matter, particulary if you want to be making money at the end of the day. Your message will get lost in the distraction of the poor quality as people will be focused on how horrible the production is. Now if you want to be a parody of yourself and people watch and listen BECAUSE of how horrible it is, I guess that could be good entertainment value. Sort of like the old SCTV show. That might work. I don’t think that is what you are going for, though. How much extra work does it take to make sure you are well editied and well scripted? Sounds like you don’t want to put in the effort.
Did you even read that NTY link you referenced? It’s not talking about videoblogging (I’m going to take a shower, now. I hate referencing that term.), it’s talking about “viral video”, which are two completely different things in my mind. Youtube seems to be a medium that allows people to show their goofy movies, something kids and others have been doing ever since the Super 8 movie camera was invented. The only thing we have no is the ability for advertisers to try to ride along side the popular downloads. And why are those downloads popular? Hmmm..I dunno…maybe because they are well done, well edited and fun to watch, as opposed to some nattering dweeb bloviating about some unimportant subject? Just a guess.
Oh, and getting back to the “production question”, did you even happen to read the first paragraphs of that article:
Plan: Think about where you’re shooting from and where the action is.
Edit: Keep the action interesting; only include what’s essential.
Frame: Get closer to what you are filming so that viewers can see detail.
Please don’t tell me you are defining vblogging as any video that is put on the internet to be downloaded.
Did you even read that NTY link you referenced? It’s not talking about videoblogging (I’m going to take a shower, now. I hate referencing that term.), it’s talking about “viral video”, which are two completely different things in my mind. Youtube seems to be a medium that allows people to show their goofy movies, something kids and others have been doing ever since the Super 8 movie camera was invented. The only thing we have no is the ability for advertisers to try to ride along side the popular downloads. And why are those downloads popular? Hmmm..I dunno…maybe because they are well done, well edited and fun to watch, as opposed to some nattering dweeb bloviating about some unimportant subject? Just a guess.
Oh, and getting back to the “production question”, did you even happen to read the first paragraphs of that article:
Plan: Think about where you’re shooting from and where the action is.
Edit: Keep the action interesting; only include what’s essential.
Frame: Get closer to what you are filming so that viewers can see detail.
Please don’t tell me you are defining vblogging as any video that is put on the internet to be downloaded.
If its not at a decent standard I move on quickly – however interesting it may be its not worth the effort.
But a key thing you should be thinking about is the future value of the material you create. If its badly recorded (shaky camera, poor sound quality) it has no value in ten years time for a tv show or xyz medium yet to be invented.
Your pension may be hidden away in some of the material you create today (its just that at this moment you can’t know what will pay out in the end).
Its how old school photographers and film-makers worked…
If its not at a decent standard I move on quickly – however interesting it may be its not worth the effort.
But a key thing you should be thinking about is the future value of the material you create. If its badly recorded (shaky camera, poor sound quality) it has no value in ten years time for a tv show or xyz medium yet to be invented.
Your pension may be hidden away in some of the material you create today (its just that at this moment you can’t know what will pay out in the end).
Its how old school photographers and film-makers worked…
Ok, So my biggest complaint about some of the vidcasts that I watch is format. we have .wmv, .mov and m4v many more to name. I sometimes like to watch vidasts on my PDA which in most cases only supports .wmv. I think we need to consider what is the base format like mp3 is for podcasting. Or concider having .mov and .wmv if you are going to do video. Just my two cents. That way you may have even more viewers if you do multiple formats for all systems.
Ok, So my biggest complaint about some of the vidcasts that I watch is format. we have .wmv, .mov and m4v many more to name. I sometimes like to watch vidasts on my PDA which in most cases only supports .wmv. I think we need to consider what is the base format like mp3 is for podcasting. Or concider having .mov and .wmv if you are going to do video. Just my two cents. That way you may have even more viewers if you do multiple formats for all systems.
Using podcasting to express yourself is an incredible thing, and one that should not be dismissed. But spending time with the goal of quality is something people appreciate. It’s why the iPod has market share. Design takes time. Not a committee, just time. Our show is one where we spend hours to produce minutes of video. That’s not hours of shooting and editing, that’s hours of researching, planning, and writing because we care about entertaining our audience.
Using podcasting to express yourself is an incredible thing, and one that should not be dismissed. But spending time with the goal of quality is something people appreciate. It’s why the iPod has market share. Design takes time. Not a committee, just time. Our show is one where we spend hours to produce minutes of video. That’s not hours of shooting and editing, that’s hours of researching, planning, and writing because we care about entertaining our audience.
Hah. You know what’s funny? This reminds me of something entirely different. When I was a kid, I was an avid skateboard fan. I couldn’t skate to save my life but I loved watching my friends do it and we all loved watching skate videos.
Let me tell you something about 80s skateboarding videos. They absolutely sucked. They were horrendous, shaky handheld camera affairs with grainy pictures and crappy resolution (yes! Just like vidblogs ;)). Proper cameras and editing equipment were expensive and few skateboarding companies really had the people in-house that knew how to use them. We didn’t mind, it was simply the best they could provide at the time. So the quality was dodgy, you could hardly recognize the skaters, we paid a ridiculous price for the tapes, but it was still skateboarding. We didn’t mind.
Now it’s 2006 and guess what? There’s still skateboarding videos, but they’re different now. The subject hasn’t changed, it’s still people doing what they love doing. But the quality has improved a 10000-fold. Equipment and software has become readily available, why not use it? And as a consumer, I’ve changed. If it doesn’t look good from the start, I will fast forward it. If it doesn’t look good further in, click – it dissapears. Why? With the current products available, noone has to make a shitty skateboarding video anymore. If you do, it’s because you’re lazy, not because you’re the cool underdog who’se rebelling against the man.
What am I trying to say with this whole comment? Crappy production value is okay, as long as you realize it’s because you have no other choice due to time constraints/money/work/etc. But when you do have the possibility to make things look better, and you’re still using that excuse, you’re hiding.
Hah. You know what’s funny? This reminds me of something entirely different. When I was a kid, I was an avid skateboard fan. I couldn’t skate to save my life but I loved watching my friends do it and we all loved watching skate videos.
Let me tell you something about 80s skateboarding videos. They absolutely sucked. They were horrendous, shaky handheld camera affairs with grainy pictures and crappy resolution (yes! Just like vidblogs ;)). Proper cameras and editing equipment were expensive and few skateboarding companies really had the people in-house that knew how to use them. We didn’t mind, it was simply the best they could provide at the time. So the quality was dodgy, you could hardly recognize the skaters, we paid a ridiculous price for the tapes, but it was still skateboarding. We didn’t mind.
Now it’s 2006 and guess what? There’s still skateboarding videos, but they’re different now. The subject hasn’t changed, it’s still people doing what they love doing. But the quality has improved a 10000-fold. Equipment and software has become readily available, why not use it? And as a consumer, I’ve changed. If it doesn’t look good from the start, I will fast forward it. If it doesn’t look good further in, click – it dissapears. Why? With the current products available, noone has to make a shitty skateboarding video anymore. If you do, it’s because you’re lazy, not because you’re the cool underdog who’se rebelling against the man.
What am I trying to say with this whole comment? Crappy production value is okay, as long as you realize it’s because you have no other choice due to time constraints/money/work/etc. But when you do have the possibility to make things look better, and you’re still using that excuse, you’re hiding.
I can’t believe that people actually think that the issue is production values. As if being good at something and taking time and care with it and trying to make it as good (for your audience) as possible is actually an evil, corporate thing to do. I’ve dumped a lot of podcast feeds because even though the content was promising the lack of quality (particularly varying sound levels) made listening to them unbearable. I mostly listen to public radio stuff from around the world now – the content is great and the production value is high. The other good source of stuff is taped events like speeches. Anyone who thinks its cool to listen to unscripted (and how are you doin?) stuff has got way too much time on their hands.
I can’t believe that people actually think that the issue is production values. As if being good at something and taking time and care with it and trying to make it as good (for your audience) as possible is actually an evil, corporate thing to do. I’ve dumped a lot of podcast feeds because even though the content was promising the lack of quality (particularly varying sound levels) made listening to them unbearable. I mostly listen to public radio stuff from around the world now – the content is great and the production value is high. The other good source of stuff is taped events like speeches. Anyone who thinks its cool to listen to unscripted (and how are you doin?) stuff has got way too much time on their hands.
It’s surprising how much I can learn from this blog. Between the comments, content, and links I’d have it made if I knew how to use a computer. Production, content, Video Art(VART?), at least I’m not giving up, and allowing myself that learning curve. I could use some feed back on my last post. Not the site it’s junked. This was with a logitech and movie maker. Plus, I didn’t infringe on another artist’s rights.
It’s surprising how much I can learn from this blog. Between the comments, content, and links I’d have it made if I knew how to use a computer. Production, content, Video Art(VART?), at least I’m not giving up, and allowing myself that learning curve. I could use some feed back on my last post. Not the site it’s junked. This was with a logitech and movie maker. Plus, I didn’t infringe on another artist’s rights.
Ime with the quality crowd some of the audio quality in podcasting is dire a couple of basic shures and a decent soudcard and a baby mixer wont break the bank.
Oh and lives notch filter is great for killing nasty mains hum.
also to do serious video you may well be looking at 2-3 cameras if you want to cover an interviewer and the subject plus posibly a wide shot.
The prosumer sonys are only 2-3 k which is the minimum I would consider using for a company doing vloging.
Ime with the quality crowd some of the audio quality in podcasting is dire a couple of basic shures and a decent soudcard and a baby mixer wont break the bank.
Oh and lives notch filter is great for killing nasty mains hum.
also to do serious video you may well be looking at 2-3 cameras if you want to cover an interviewer and the subject plus posibly a wide shot.
The prosumer sonys are only 2-3 k which is the minimum I would consider using for a company doing vloging.
I admit I check out Rocketboom now and then. They are rolling in ad $ but I think she keeps a TI 99/4a on her desk as a prop. I get a kick out of that–I had one as a kid, with the speech synth on the side!
I admit I check out Rocketboom now and then. They are rolling in ad $ but I think she keeps a TI 99/4a on her desk as a prop. I get a kick out of that–I had one as a kid, with the speech synth on the side!
Vlog and Blog put the means to create back in the hands of the masses. I write (blog, and poetry) and hope to vlog. Without the finance to produce big budget mainstream film vlog is an opportunity to create and see what reaction occurs.
Similar with blogging, I write to see what reaction I can engender from a potential audience. I have read all sorts of advice on increasing traffic to publicise my blog. I write (I hope) with a fairly high standard of production, trying to remain coherent and interesting. I couldn’t afford to be published many other ways. I read many blogs using the “txt” lexicon (which just give me a headache) that I see no point in even returning to. But there is the measure of the standard. There is the measure of the whole movement. It is all self criticising. If you publish anything and no-one visits or comments then you soon become bored and move on to something else or re-asses your style. If you can afford the production values and want to use them, why not use them. It doesn’t mean that the end product is any better than Joe Bloggs vlogging from his bedroom every Thursday night.
Vlog and Blog put the means to create back in the hands of the masses. I write (blog, and poetry) and hope to vlog. Without the finance to produce big budget mainstream film vlog is an opportunity to create and see what reaction occurs.
Similar with blogging, I write to see what reaction I can engender from a potential audience. I have read all sorts of advice on increasing traffic to publicise my blog. I write (I hope) with a fairly high standard of production, trying to remain coherent and interesting. I couldn’t afford to be published many other ways. I read many blogs using the “txt” lexicon (which just give me a headache) that I see no point in even returning to. But there is the measure of the standard. There is the measure of the whole movement. It is all self criticising. If you publish anything and no-one visits or comments then you soon become bored and move on to something else or re-asses your style. If you can afford the production values and want to use them, why not use them. It doesn’t mean that the end product is any better than Joe Bloggs vlogging from his bedroom every Thursday night.
Solid production values can and should coexist with the passion. I don’t shoot photos of friends for anyone but me, but I want them to be the best quality possible. It shows pride in your work, and more importantly, makes your content digestion go down smoother.
Solid production values can and should coexist with the passion. I don’t shoot photos of friends for anyone but me, but I want them to be the best quality possible. It shows pride in your work, and more importantly, makes your content digestion go down smoother.
I think the point is that content will always trump production values. This is what big media is worried about. As an individual, I can’t compete with Hollywood budgets but, if I’m making something designed for more than just family and friends, I can compete with a good idea. How many 100 million dollar films have everything but a good idea?
The other side of this is that who you are talking to matters. If I put up a video of my kids, I don’t expect anyone but my parents to be interested. For them it’s a kick ass video even if it’s a little shaky or the audio isn’t great.
I think the point is that content will always trump production values. This is what big media is worried about. As an individual, I can’t compete with Hollywood budgets but, if I’m making something designed for more than just family and friends, I can compete with a good idea. How many 100 million dollar films have everything but a good idea?
The other side of this is that who you are talking to matters. If I put up a video of my kids, I don’t expect anyone but my parents to be interested. For them it’s a kick ass video even if it’s a little shaky or the audio isn’t great.
Here’s a vlog by a guy who teaches programming. The vlog is more the cool interactive stuff that can be done with programming, rather than a how-too, but it has links to his programming syllabus, and the videos are nifty.
Here’s a vlog by a guy who teaches programming. The vlog is more the cool interactive stuff that can be done with programming, rather than a how-too, but it has links to his programming syllabus, and the videos are nifty.
Uh hello people…isn’t it true that some of the ‘production values’ problem isn’t due to a lack of whiz-bang geek toys (or a lack of proficiency in using them) but in the talents of the people themselves making them?!?! You know, old school things, like acting, voice-over work, music composition, script/screenwriting, editing, etc. You can’t fully dispense with the importance of the meatware here.
If I go out and shoot a video on DV, no way is it going to be as ‘good’ as say what Ethan Hawke could do on DV (you can check out the film ‘Chelsea Walls’ if you’re interested in the history of DV usage by the industry). I’m not trained in acting, voice work, scoring film or video and even if I’ve got the latest in DV cameras and editing suites etc plus what I thing is an interesting script, I’m going to have a heck of a time competing with pros who know these less technology dependent skills. Plus I don’t have the cred (or should it be old media penetration and saturation) of someone like Ethan so I’m already at a dis advantage in the ‘hit-getting’ contest.
This is not to say that a ‘production-values challenged’ vlog doesn’t have any value, but that maybe the playing field isn’t as level as it should be (especially not once people with name recognition and old media credentials start messing around with the technologies).
Uh hello people…isn’t it true that some of the ‘production values’ problem isn’t due to a lack of whiz-bang geek toys (or a lack of proficiency in using them) but in the talents of the people themselves making them?!?! You know, old school things, like acting, voice-over work, music composition, script/screenwriting, editing, etc. You can’t fully dispense with the importance of the meatware here.
If I go out and shoot a video on DV, no way is it going to be as ‘good’ as say what Ethan Hawke could do on DV (you can check out the film ‘Chelsea Walls’ if you’re interested in the history of DV usage by the industry). I’m not trained in acting, voice work, scoring film or video and even if I’ve got the latest in DV cameras and editing suites etc plus what I thing is an interesting script, I’m going to have a heck of a time competing with pros who know these less technology dependent skills. Plus I don’t have the cred (or should it be old media penetration and saturation) of someone like Ethan so I’m already at a dis advantage in the ‘hit-getting’ contest.
This is not to say that a ‘production-values challenged’ vlog doesn’t have any value, but that maybe the playing field isn’t as level as it should be (especially not once people with name recognition and old media credentials start messing around with the technologies).
My only complaint about the work on C9, which is completely overshadowed by its positives, so please take this complain in persepective is the poor audio.
Its one of the reasons I’m not as eager to view videos there as I once was.
There is nothing more frustrating than not being able to hear someone because
1 – The microphone , assuming there is one, is no where near them
2 – Someone’s shirt is making love to the microphone
3 – There’s some god-awful static , hiss, or other noise in the background
4 – Scoble is laughing (at his own joke).
louder than the speaker who is trying to talk and ignore the inane distraction. (sorry :))
My only complaint about the work on C9, which is completely overshadowed by its positives, so please take this complain in persepective is the poor audio.
Its one of the reasons I’m not as eager to view videos there as I once was.
There is nothing more frustrating than not being able to hear someone because
1 – The microphone , assuming there is one, is no where near them
2 – Someone’s shirt is making love to the microphone
3 – There’s some god-awful static , hiss, or other noise in the background
4 – Scoble is laughing (at his own joke).
louder than the speaker who is trying to talk and ignore the inane distraction. (sorry :))
Don’t quite agree with you, Mr. Scoble. And, it may be a matter of semantics. In particular, the question is the meaning of “production values.” I see it more a function of the skills to create compelling content, not necessarily exorbitant costs and lengthy meetings tied to production.
Don’t quite agree with you, Mr. Scoble. And, it may be a matter of semantics. In particular, the question is the meaning of “production values.” I see it more a function of the skills to create compelling content, not necessarily exorbitant costs and lengthy meetings tied to production.
I shot my first documentary with myself and another guy. It was on VHS with a on board mike except for the talking head. It was edited on a straight cuts only non-digital tape to tape machine. It won the Directors Prize at The Illinois Film & Video Festival & got on the David Wolper/IDA Student reel. NOt to brag because I have sort of allowed my career to go downhill but I have to say story is 90%. I go to Blockbuster and see these qo million dollar bore-fests and although it is even hard to make a bad movie, if you were going to get 10 million wouldn’t you want to make one from the heart and if you don’t have it your heart, get a screenplay from someone who has something to say.
Make films about what you know. But in the end I wished I had done a 90 minute film on this subject and shot it on 35mm. However in documentary , subjects tend to shut down in front of big crews.
I shot my first documentary with myself and another guy. It was on VHS with a on board mike except for the talking head. It was edited on a straight cuts only non-digital tape to tape machine. It won the Directors Prize at The Illinois Film & Video Festival & got on the David Wolper/IDA Student reel. NOt to brag because I have sort of allowed my career to go downhill but I have to say story is 90%. I go to Blockbuster and see these qo million dollar bore-fests and although it is even hard to make a bad movie, if you were going to get 10 million wouldn’t you want to make one from the heart and if you don’t have it your heart, get a screenplay from someone who has something to say.
Make films about what you know. But in the end I wished I had done a 90 minute film on this subject and shot it on 35mm. However in documentary , subjects tend to shut down in front of big crews.
The problem I see with the “grassroots people” is that they wear their poor production values as a badge of honor — so they are *misssing* the point of podcasting, blogging, vlogging, etc.
The point is the CONTENT, not the production values. Wait, does it sound like I’m switching gears? No, the content is king, but poor production values can get in the way of the message.
Poor production shouldn’t stop you from doing your thing, but it’s not something to which you should aspire (unspire?). In general, the better your production values, the easier it is for people to get the message — and that’s the most important thing, isn’t it?
LikeLike
The problem I see with the “grassroots people” is that they wear their poor production values as a badge of honor — so they are *misssing* the point of podcasting, blogging, vlogging, etc.
The point is the CONTENT, not the production values. Wait, does it sound like I’m switching gears? No, the content is king, but poor production values can get in the way of the message.
Poor production shouldn’t stop you from doing your thing, but it’s not something to which you should aspire (unspire?). In general, the better your production values, the easier it is for people to get the message — and that’s the most important thing, isn’t it?
LikeLike
Jay: I agree. But there’s a lot of things that can be communicated without spending the time on the camera, the audio, the editing.
Yeah, it can always be made better. But, watch this video of Emma and her mom. http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6642002519086292079 It’s horrible. If you look at it that way. But to her family? I’ll bet it’s precious and I bet they don’t really care that it was a shaky camera, with audio that could have been better, with lighting that sucked.
Not everything has to look like a Superbowl commercial. And that’s why I love this new medium.
LikeLike
Jay: I agree. But there’s a lot of things that can be communicated without spending the time on the camera, the audio, the editing.
Yeah, it can always be made better. But, watch this video of Emma and her mom. http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6642002519086292079 It’s horrible. If you look at it that way. But to her family? I’ll bet it’s precious and I bet they don’t really care that it was a shaky camera, with audio that could have been better, with lighting that sucked.
Not everything has to look like a Superbowl commercial. And that’s why I love this new medium.
LikeLike
I agree with you Robert. Here quality of the production is not the issue. THe main issue is do people like it or not and are people interested to spend some time from their every day life or not. Video blogs will gain a momentum within just 2 years when millions and may be nearly one billion users from Asia and Africa get connected to high speed internet. The market is going to increase mutlifuld with in just 2-3 years.
LikeLike
I agree with you Robert. Here quality of the production is not the issue. THe main issue is do people like it or not and are people interested to spend some time from their every day life or not. Video blogs will gain a momentum within just 2 years when millions and may be nearly one billion users from Asia and Africa get connected to high speed internet. The market is going to increase mutlifuld with in just 2-3 years.
LikeLike
Take a look at audio podcasting, which has already matured more fully than vlogging. Trust me: production values matter. It’s the values that may have changed, though. Authenticity is important, and you simply don’t *want* to sound like a commercial radio DJ. But you should balance out your volumes, for example – when I’m listening to interviews on my bike and I can’t hear one of the two persons talking because of the volume differences, I unsubscribe.
LikeLike
Take a look at audio podcasting, which has already matured more fully than vlogging. Trust me: production values matter. It’s the values that may have changed, though. Authenticity is important, and you simply don’t *want* to sound like a commercial radio DJ. But you should balance out your volumes, for example – when I’m listening to interviews on my bike and I can’t hear one of the two persons talking because of the volume differences, I unsubscribe.
LikeLike
OK, is accessibility a “production value”? Microsoft has more money than God, yet the entirety of Channel 9 is, for example, uncaptioned. Oh, but that might interfere with your *immediacy*, I suppose.
LikeLike
OK, is accessibility a “production value”? Microsoft has more money than God, yet the entirety of Channel 9 is, for example, uncaptioned. Oh, but that might interfere with your *immediacy*, I suppose.
LikeLike
Joe do you do video? Have you ever done captions? It’s very expensive and time consuming, yes. Maybe Microsoft could afford it (but then why couldn’t they pay me more than $100,000) but certainly there’s a whole raft of people out there who can’t pay around $300 a video or podcast to get transcripts done.
LikeLike
Joe do you do video? Have you ever done captions? It’s very expensive and time consuming, yes. Maybe Microsoft could afford it (but then why couldn’t they pay me more than $100,000) but certainly there’s a whole raft of people out there who can’t pay around $300 a video or podcast to get transcripts done.
LikeLike
I feel like this debate (and the similar podcasting debate) is being phrased in terms that make it very difficult to solve.
Can you be a podcaster or vlogger (I hate that word) with poor production qualities?
Can you be a blogger who can’t spell or punctuate?
Of course. Will you be a better blogger, podcaster, or vlogger when you have a greater command of the medium? All other things equal, yes.
Dave has a ton of people who listen to his podcast… not because of it’s poor production values but INSPITE OF IT. There are plenty of people (like me) who do not listen because of the dead air (etc).
Would Dave have more listeners if he did a little editing? I think so. At least one more.
To me it seems like the issue is more that podcasters and vloggers are either too lazy to do some editing (which may be fine, depending on their audience) or they don’t know how, so instead of learning they prefer to jump up on a soapbox about how it’s unimportant.
Sure, sure, there’s a law of diminishing returns… how many more listeners/viewers does that extra hour of production work get you?
But it seems counter-intuitive to suggest that having a more watchable/listenable show is going to hurt you.
LikeLike
I feel like this debate (and the similar podcasting debate) is being phrased in terms that make it very difficult to solve.
Can you be a podcaster or vlogger (I hate that word) with poor production qualities?
Can you be a blogger who can’t spell or punctuate?
Of course. Will you be a better blogger, podcaster, or vlogger when you have a greater command of the medium? All other things equal, yes.
Dave has a ton of people who listen to his podcast… not because of it’s poor production values but INSPITE OF IT. There are plenty of people (like me) who do not listen because of the dead air (etc).
Would Dave have more listeners if he did a little editing? I think so. At least one more.
To me it seems like the issue is more that podcasters and vloggers are either too lazy to do some editing (which may be fine, depending on their audience) or they don’t know how, so instead of learning they prefer to jump up on a soapbox about how it’s unimportant.
Sure, sure, there’s a law of diminishing returns… how many more listeners/viewers does that extra hour of production work get you?
But it seems counter-intuitive to suggest that having a more watchable/listenable show is going to hurt you.
LikeLike
(My god, sorry for the long comment. I probably should’ve blogged it and trackbacked.)
LikeLike
I’m with you 100% on this buddy. And the example I’ve often used is to point to hollywood. Nine times out of ten I’d rather watch a film with a great story but basic production values over… the latest Michael Bay film (whatever that happens to be). And let’s face it – the reason podcasting has exploded isn’t because we were all sitting home thinking “gee the production values on mainstream media plain suck”. It was a lack of interesting content. Now, since I started G’Day World a couple of years ago I’ve upgraded my mic from the $20 headset to something that cost me slightly more… and I bought some additional equipment as well. But mainly because it saves me significant post-production time (GIGO). Someone told me recently how Rocketboom’s success has to do with the fact they shoot it (apparently) on HD. I told him I couldn’t tell the difference on my iPod.
LikeLike
(My god, sorry for the long comment. I probably should’ve blogged it and trackbacked.)
LikeLike
I’m with you 100% on this buddy. And the example I’ve often used is to point to hollywood. Nine times out of ten I’d rather watch a film with a great story but basic production values over… the latest Michael Bay film (whatever that happens to be). And let’s face it – the reason podcasting has exploded isn’t because we were all sitting home thinking “gee the production values on mainstream media plain suck”. It was a lack of interesting content. Now, since I started G’Day World a couple of years ago I’ve upgraded my mic from the $20 headset to something that cost me slightly more… and I bought some additional equipment as well. But mainly because it saves me significant post-production time (GIGO). Someone told me recently how Rocketboom’s success has to do with the fact they shoot it (apparently) on HD. I told him I couldn’t tell the difference on my iPod.
LikeLike
Saying production values don’t matter in video is like saying good writing doesn’t matter in an article or an essay. No matter the medium, you need to be articulate.
What so-called videoblogging is doing is recreating cable access crap on an extremely large scale. Nothing on the 150 professional cable channels? Great. Now you’ve got 150,000 cable access shows to choose from.
Wheeeeeee!
LikeLike
Saying production values don’t matter in video is like saying good writing doesn’t matter in an article or an essay. No matter the medium, you need to be articulate.
What so-called videoblogging is doing is recreating cable access crap on an extremely large scale. Nothing on the 150 professional cable channels? Great. Now you’ve got 150,000 cable access shows to choose from.
Wheeeeeee!
LikeLike
Take a moment to consider audio quality from the perspective of the listener. What do podcasts give me? Choice. I can choose from a world full of content – and I can choose when and where I want to consume it.
Unfortunately, “when and where” is most often while driving, on public transport, or walking noisy streets. And if I can’t hear it, I exercise my choice: “Next!”
It’s not about being “fancy”. If I can’t hear your podcast, I won’t cry over it. There is more quality content out there than I can ever hope to consume. “Next!”
LikeLike
Take a moment to consider audio quality from the perspective of the listener. What do podcasts give me? Choice. I can choose from a world full of content – and I can choose when and where I want to consume it.
Unfortunately, “when and where” is most often while driving, on public transport, or walking noisy streets. And if I can’t hear it, I exercise my choice: “Next!”
It’s not about being “fancy”. If I can’t hear your podcast, I won’t cry over it. There is more quality content out there than I can ever hope to consume. “Next!”
LikeLike
Rebort: sorry, you’re missing what’s going on here. Emma’s parents would never have been able to get her on a cable access channel. This is much deeper and broader than that. Not to mention that I don’t have a cable access channel to distribute my crap on.
LikeLike
Rebort: sorry, you’re missing what’s going on here. Emma’s parents would never have been able to get her on a cable access channel. This is much deeper and broader than that. Not to mention that I don’t have a cable access channel to distribute my crap on.
LikeLike
Production values require committees?
Not always…and usually only with dsyfunctional organizations (not much a surprise at Microsoft).
Production values require TALENT and know-how.
I turn my Events/Weddings/Bar and Bat Mitzvahs/Corporate Marketing Rot shoots into works of Hollywood art, and I am only one person out of two. And I do it fast too, (thanks Ultimate S 2). All Hail Douglas Spotted Eagle (my guru of sorts).
Poor quality only means poor quality. You can blog without knowing how to write. You can vblog without knowing the basics of production, handheld shaky cam with bad audio in tow. Heck, freedom. But the better you write, and the better your production values the more attention you will get. Quite simple, yes?
Channel 9 is niche. Some lower two-thirds, some serious editing, with some DECENT audio, and narrational VO’s, with a Steadicam feel…well you might have gotten MORE of an audience. I could have turned that place around, single-handedly, and that’s no idle boast.
Your on10 is much better, but then it’s headachey MTV jump-cut short attention span, pointless stupid geek tricks bugs me to no end, makes my teeth hurt. But then I am not the target audience, so can’t fault them for ‘style’.
Nothing WRONG with the smallish Indy’s taking on Hollywood if you will, but the first and foremost consideration is always (and will always be) quality.
LikeLike
Production values require committees?
Not always…and usually only with dsyfunctional organizations (not much a surprise at Microsoft).
Production values require TALENT and know-how.
I turn my Events/Weddings/Bar and Bat Mitzvahs/Corporate Marketing Rot shoots into works of Hollywood art, and I am only one person out of two. And I do it fast too, (thanks Ultimate S 2). All Hail Douglas Spotted Eagle (my guru of sorts).
Poor quality only means poor quality. You can blog without knowing how to write. You can vblog without knowing the basics of production, handheld shaky cam with bad audio in tow. Heck, freedom. But the better you write, and the better your production values the more attention you will get. Quite simple, yes?
Channel 9 is niche. Some lower two-thirds, some serious editing, with some DECENT audio, and narrational VO’s, with a Steadicam feel…well you might have gotten MORE of an audience. I could have turned that place around, single-handedly, and that’s no idle boast.
Your on10 is much better, but then it’s headachey MTV jump-cut short attention span, pointless stupid geek tricks bugs me to no end, makes my teeth hurt. But then I am not the target audience, so can’t fault them for ‘style’.
Nothing WRONG with the smallish Indy’s taking on Hollywood if you will, but the first and foremost consideration is always (and will always be) quality.
LikeLike
Still harping on the $100,000 salary issue? Are you really that bitter about it? I guess we now know for sure why you left. You were there 3 years? Obviously then, MS didn’t see the value it got from your Channel 9 duties and your off hours blogging to put a “face on Microsoft” as being worth more than $100,000 to them. Which is a very interesting commentary when you place it up against your perceived worth to MS.
As for the “production” issue. Well, on the one hand I guess al-Queda is able to get its point across with low-quality videos. (Nick Berg, etc). Is that the level you are aspiring to? I’m not sure “committees” are required for good, high quality production videos. Spielberg was able to turn our some pretty good stuff while he was in film school. I don’think he had a committee for that.
You’re fooling yourself if you think quality doesn’t matter, particulary if you want to be making money at the end of the day. Your message will get lost in the distraction of the poor quality as people will be focused on how horrible the production is. Now if you want to be a parody of yourself and people watch and listen BECAUSE of how horrible it is, I guess that could be good entertainment value. Sort of like the old SCTV show. That might work. I don’t think that is what you are going for, though. How much extra work does it take to make sure you are well editied and well scripted? Sounds like you don’t want to put in the effort.
LikeLike
Still harping on the $100,000 salary issue? Are you really that bitter about it? I guess we now know for sure why you left. You were there 3 years? Obviously then, MS didn’t see the value it got from your Channel 9 duties and your off hours blogging to put a “face on Microsoft” as being worth more than $100,000 to them. Which is a very interesting commentary when you place it up against your perceived worth to MS.
As for the “production” issue. Well, on the one hand I guess al-Queda is able to get its point across with low-quality videos. (Nick Berg, etc). Is that the level you are aspiring to? I’m not sure “committees” are required for good, high quality production videos. Spielberg was able to turn our some pretty good stuff while he was in film school. I don’think he had a committee for that.
You’re fooling yourself if you think quality doesn’t matter, particulary if you want to be making money at the end of the day. Your message will get lost in the distraction of the poor quality as people will be focused on how horrible the production is. Now if you want to be a parody of yourself and people watch and listen BECAUSE of how horrible it is, I guess that could be good entertainment value. Sort of like the old SCTV show. That might work. I don’t think that is what you are going for, though. How much extra work does it take to make sure you are well editied and well scripted? Sounds like you don’t want to put in the effort.
LikeLike
When I shot a comedy in college, we used a webcam with no external mic and fixed it up with a semi-legal copy of Adobe Premier.
It was awful. Could hardly hear anyone, video was grainy, soundtracking and voiceover constantly drowned out sound. And it brought down the house.
Because we didn’t waste our time talking to a bunch of other filmmakers about production values. Instead we made something clever.
I love hearing about these useless arguments at conferences — they keep the boring people too busy to make movies.
LikeLike
When I shot a comedy in college, we used a webcam with no external mic and fixed it up with a semi-legal copy of Adobe Premier.
It was awful. Could hardly hear anyone, video was grainy, soundtracking and voiceover constantly drowned out sound. And it brought down the house.
Because we didn’t waste our time talking to a bunch of other filmmakers about production values. Instead we made something clever.
I love hearing about these useless arguments at conferences — they keep the boring people too busy to make movies.
LikeLike
Did you even read that NTY link you referenced? It’s not talking about videoblogging (I’m going to take a shower, now. I hate referencing that term.), it’s talking about “viral video”, which are two completely different things in my mind. Youtube seems to be a medium that allows people to show their goofy movies, something kids and others have been doing ever since the Super 8 movie camera was invented. The only thing we have no is the ability for advertisers to try to ride along side the popular downloads. And why are those downloads popular? Hmmm..I dunno…maybe because they are well done, well edited and fun to watch, as opposed to some nattering dweeb bloviating about some unimportant subject? Just a guess.
Oh, and getting back to the “production question”, did you even happen to read the first paragraphs of that article:
Plan: Think about where you’re shooting from and where the action is.
Edit: Keep the action interesting; only include what’s essential.
Frame: Get closer to what you are filming so that viewers can see detail.
Please don’t tell me you are defining vblogging as any video that is put on the internet to be downloaded.
LikeLike
Did you even read that NTY link you referenced? It’s not talking about videoblogging (I’m going to take a shower, now. I hate referencing that term.), it’s talking about “viral video”, which are two completely different things in my mind. Youtube seems to be a medium that allows people to show their goofy movies, something kids and others have been doing ever since the Super 8 movie camera was invented. The only thing we have no is the ability for advertisers to try to ride along side the popular downloads. And why are those downloads popular? Hmmm..I dunno…maybe because they are well done, well edited and fun to watch, as opposed to some nattering dweeb bloviating about some unimportant subject? Just a guess.
Oh, and getting back to the “production question”, did you even happen to read the first paragraphs of that article:
Plan: Think about where you’re shooting from and where the action is.
Edit: Keep the action interesting; only include what’s essential.
Frame: Get closer to what you are filming so that viewers can see detail.
Please don’t tell me you are defining vblogging as any video that is put on the internet to be downloaded.
LikeLike
I love hearing about these useless arguments at conferences — they keep the boring people too busy to make movies.
Ohmigosh. Quote of the Week. 🙂
LikeLike
I love hearing about these useless arguments at conferences — they keep the boring people too busy to make movies.
Ohmigosh. Quote of the Week. 🙂
LikeLike
If its not at a decent standard I move on quickly – however interesting it may be its not worth the effort.
But a key thing you should be thinking about is the future value of the material you create. If its badly recorded (shaky camera, poor sound quality) it has no value in ten years time for a tv show or xyz medium yet to be invented.
Your pension may be hidden away in some of the material you create today (its just that at this moment you can’t know what will pay out in the end).
Its how old school photographers and film-makers worked…
LikeLike
If its not at a decent standard I move on quickly – however interesting it may be its not worth the effort.
But a key thing you should be thinking about is the future value of the material you create. If its badly recorded (shaky camera, poor sound quality) it has no value in ten years time for a tv show or xyz medium yet to be invented.
Your pension may be hidden away in some of the material you create today (its just that at this moment you can’t know what will pay out in the end).
Its how old school photographers and film-makers worked…
LikeLike
Ok, So my biggest complaint about some of the vidcasts that I watch is format. we have .wmv, .mov and m4v many more to name. I sometimes like to watch vidasts on my PDA which in most cases only supports .wmv. I think we need to consider what is the base format like mp3 is for podcasting. Or concider having .mov and .wmv if you are going to do video. Just my two cents. That way you may have even more viewers if you do multiple formats for all systems.
LikeLike
Ok, So my biggest complaint about some of the vidcasts that I watch is format. we have .wmv, .mov and m4v many more to name. I sometimes like to watch vidasts on my PDA which in most cases only supports .wmv. I think we need to consider what is the base format like mp3 is for podcasting. Or concider having .mov and .wmv if you are going to do video. Just my two cents. That way you may have even more viewers if you do multiple formats for all systems.
LikeLike
Using podcasting to express yourself is an incredible thing, and one that should not be dismissed. But spending time with the goal of quality is something people appreciate. It’s why the iPod has market share. Design takes time. Not a committee, just time. Our show is one where we spend hours to produce minutes of video. That’s not hours of shooting and editing, that’s hours of researching, planning, and writing because we care about entertaining our audience.
LikeLike
Using podcasting to express yourself is an incredible thing, and one that should not be dismissed. But spending time with the goal of quality is something people appreciate. It’s why the iPod has market share. Design takes time. Not a committee, just time. Our show is one where we spend hours to produce minutes of video. That’s not hours of shooting and editing, that’s hours of researching, planning, and writing because we care about entertaining our audience.
LikeLike
Hah. You know what’s funny? This reminds me of something entirely different. When I was a kid, I was an avid skateboard fan. I couldn’t skate to save my life but I loved watching my friends do it and we all loved watching skate videos.
Let me tell you something about 80s skateboarding videos. They absolutely sucked. They were horrendous, shaky handheld camera affairs with grainy pictures and crappy resolution (yes! Just like vidblogs ;)). Proper cameras and editing equipment were expensive and few skateboarding companies really had the people in-house that knew how to use them. We didn’t mind, it was simply the best they could provide at the time. So the quality was dodgy, you could hardly recognize the skaters, we paid a ridiculous price for the tapes, but it was still skateboarding. We didn’t mind.
Now it’s 2006 and guess what? There’s still skateboarding videos, but they’re different now. The subject hasn’t changed, it’s still people doing what they love doing. But the quality has improved a 10000-fold. Equipment and software has become readily available, why not use it? And as a consumer, I’ve changed. If it doesn’t look good from the start, I will fast forward it. If it doesn’t look good further in, click – it dissapears. Why? With the current products available, noone has to make a shitty skateboarding video anymore. If you do, it’s because you’re lazy, not because you’re the cool underdog who’se rebelling against the man.
What am I trying to say with this whole comment? Crappy production value is okay, as long as you realize it’s because you have no other choice due to time constraints/money/work/etc. But when you do have the possibility to make things look better, and you’re still using that excuse, you’re hiding.
LikeLike
Hah. You know what’s funny? This reminds me of something entirely different. When I was a kid, I was an avid skateboard fan. I couldn’t skate to save my life but I loved watching my friends do it and we all loved watching skate videos.
Let me tell you something about 80s skateboarding videos. They absolutely sucked. They were horrendous, shaky handheld camera affairs with grainy pictures and crappy resolution (yes! Just like vidblogs ;)). Proper cameras and editing equipment were expensive and few skateboarding companies really had the people in-house that knew how to use them. We didn’t mind, it was simply the best they could provide at the time. So the quality was dodgy, you could hardly recognize the skaters, we paid a ridiculous price for the tapes, but it was still skateboarding. We didn’t mind.
Now it’s 2006 and guess what? There’s still skateboarding videos, but they’re different now. The subject hasn’t changed, it’s still people doing what they love doing. But the quality has improved a 10000-fold. Equipment and software has become readily available, why not use it? And as a consumer, I’ve changed. If it doesn’t look good from the start, I will fast forward it. If it doesn’t look good further in, click – it dissapears. Why? With the current products available, noone has to make a shitty skateboarding video anymore. If you do, it’s because you’re lazy, not because you’re the cool underdog who’se rebelling against the man.
What am I trying to say with this whole comment? Crappy production value is okay, as long as you realize it’s because you have no other choice due to time constraints/money/work/etc. But when you do have the possibility to make things look better, and you’re still using that excuse, you’re hiding.
LikeLike
I can’t believe that people actually think that the issue is production values. As if being good at something and taking time and care with it and trying to make it as good (for your audience) as possible is actually an evil, corporate thing to do. I’ve dumped a lot of podcast feeds because even though the content was promising the lack of quality (particularly varying sound levels) made listening to them unbearable. I mostly listen to public radio stuff from around the world now – the content is great and the production value is high. The other good source of stuff is taped events like speeches. Anyone who thinks its cool to listen to unscripted (and how are you doin?) stuff has got way too much time on their hands.
LikeLike
I can’t believe that people actually think that the issue is production values. As if being good at something and taking time and care with it and trying to make it as good (for your audience) as possible is actually an evil, corporate thing to do. I’ve dumped a lot of podcast feeds because even though the content was promising the lack of quality (particularly varying sound levels) made listening to them unbearable. I mostly listen to public radio stuff from around the world now – the content is great and the production value is high. The other good source of stuff is taped events like speeches. Anyone who thinks its cool to listen to unscripted (and how are you doin?) stuff has got way too much time on their hands.
LikeLike
It’s surprising how much I can learn from this blog. Between the comments, content, and links I’d have it made if I knew how to use a computer. Production, content, Video Art(VART?), at least I’m not giving up, and allowing myself that learning curve. I could use some feed back on my last post. Not the site it’s junked. This was with a logitech and movie maker. Plus, I didn’t infringe on another artist’s rights.
LikeLike
It’s surprising how much I can learn from this blog. Between the comments, content, and links I’d have it made if I knew how to use a computer. Production, content, Video Art(VART?), at least I’m not giving up, and allowing myself that learning curve. I could use some feed back on my last post. Not the site it’s junked. This was with a logitech and movie maker. Plus, I didn’t infringe on another artist’s rights.
LikeLike
Hmm
Ime with the quality crowd some of the audio quality in podcasting is dire a couple of basic shures and a decent soudcard and a baby mixer wont break the bank.
Oh and lives notch filter is great for killing nasty mains hum.
also to do serious video you may well be looking at 2-3 cameras if you want to cover an interviewer and the subject plus posibly a wide shot.
The prosumer sonys are only 2-3 k which is the minimum I would consider using for a company doing vloging.
LikeLike
Hmm
Ime with the quality crowd some of the audio quality in podcasting is dire a couple of basic shures and a decent soudcard and a baby mixer wont break the bank.
Oh and lives notch filter is great for killing nasty mains hum.
also to do serious video you may well be looking at 2-3 cameras if you want to cover an interviewer and the subject plus posibly a wide shot.
The prosumer sonys are only 2-3 k which is the minimum I would consider using for a company doing vloging.
LikeLike
I admit I check out Rocketboom now and then. They are rolling in ad $ but I think she keeps a TI 99/4a on her desk as a prop. I get a kick out of that–I had one as a kid, with the speech synth on the side!
LikeLike
I admit I check out Rocketboom now and then. They are rolling in ad $ but I think she keeps a TI 99/4a on her desk as a prop. I get a kick out of that–I had one as a kid, with the speech synth on the side!
LikeLike
Vlog and Blog put the means to create back in the hands of the masses. I write (blog, and poetry) and hope to vlog. Without the finance to produce big budget mainstream film vlog is an opportunity to create and see what reaction occurs.
Similar with blogging, I write to see what reaction I can engender from a potential audience. I have read all sorts of advice on increasing traffic to publicise my blog. I write (I hope) with a fairly high standard of production, trying to remain coherent and interesting. I couldn’t afford to be published many other ways. I read many blogs using the “txt” lexicon (which just give me a headache) that I see no point in even returning to. But there is the measure of the standard. There is the measure of the whole movement. It is all self criticising. If you publish anything and no-one visits or comments then you soon become bored and move on to something else or re-asses your style. If you can afford the production values and want to use them, why not use them. It doesn’t mean that the end product is any better than Joe Bloggs vlogging from his bedroom every Thursday night.
LikeLike
Vlog and Blog put the means to create back in the hands of the masses. I write (blog, and poetry) and hope to vlog. Without the finance to produce big budget mainstream film vlog is an opportunity to create and see what reaction occurs.
Similar with blogging, I write to see what reaction I can engender from a potential audience. I have read all sorts of advice on increasing traffic to publicise my blog. I write (I hope) with a fairly high standard of production, trying to remain coherent and interesting. I couldn’t afford to be published many other ways. I read many blogs using the “txt” lexicon (which just give me a headache) that I see no point in even returning to. But there is the measure of the standard. There is the measure of the whole movement. It is all self criticising. If you publish anything and no-one visits or comments then you soon become bored and move on to something else or re-asses your style. If you can afford the production values and want to use them, why not use them. It doesn’t mean that the end product is any better than Joe Bloggs vlogging from his bedroom every Thursday night.
LikeLike
Solid production values can and should coexist with the passion. I don’t shoot photos of friends for anyone but me, but I want them to be the best quality possible. It shows pride in your work, and more importantly, makes your content digestion go down smoother.
LikeLike
Solid production values can and should coexist with the passion. I don’t shoot photos of friends for anyone but me, but I want them to be the best quality possible. It shows pride in your work, and more importantly, makes your content digestion go down smoother.
LikeLike
I think the point is that content will always trump production values. This is what big media is worried about. As an individual, I can’t compete with Hollywood budgets but, if I’m making something designed for more than just family and friends, I can compete with a good idea. How many 100 million dollar films have everything but a good idea?
The other side of this is that who you are talking to matters. If I put up a video of my kids, I don’t expect anyone but my parents to be interested. For them it’s a kick ass video even if it’s a little shaky or the audio isn’t great.
LikeLike
I think the point is that content will always trump production values. This is what big media is worried about. As an individual, I can’t compete with Hollywood budgets but, if I’m making something designed for more than just family and friends, I can compete with a good idea. How many 100 million dollar films have everything but a good idea?
The other side of this is that who you are talking to matters. If I put up a video of my kids, I don’t expect anyone but my parents to be interested. For them it’s a kick ass video even if it’s a little shaky or the audio isn’t great.
LikeLike
Here’s a vlog by a guy who teaches programming. The vlog is more the cool interactive stuff that can be done with programming, rather than a how-too, but it has links to his programming syllabus, and the videos are nifty.
http://www.shiffman.net/category/vlog/
The producer of the vlog is Daniel Shiffman who is a researcher at the Interactive Telecommunications Program at ITP.
LikeLike
Here’s a vlog by a guy who teaches programming. The vlog is more the cool interactive stuff that can be done with programming, rather than a how-too, but it has links to his programming syllabus, and the videos are nifty.
http://www.shiffman.net/category/vlog/
The producer of the vlog is Daniel Shiffman who is a researcher at the Interactive Telecommunications Program at ITP.
LikeLike
Meant to say “Who is a researcher at the Interactive Telecommunications Program at NYU.”
LikeLike
Meant to say “Who is a researcher at the Interactive Telecommunications Program at NYU.”
LikeLike
Uh hello people…isn’t it true that some of the ‘production values’ problem isn’t due to a lack of whiz-bang geek toys (or a lack of proficiency in using them) but in the talents of the people themselves making them?!?! You know, old school things, like acting, voice-over work, music composition, script/screenwriting, editing, etc. You can’t fully dispense with the importance of the meatware here.
If I go out and shoot a video on DV, no way is it going to be as ‘good’ as say what Ethan Hawke could do on DV (you can check out the film ‘Chelsea Walls’ if you’re interested in the history of DV usage by the industry). I’m not trained in acting, voice work, scoring film or video and even if I’ve got the latest in DV cameras and editing suites etc plus what I thing is an interesting script, I’m going to have a heck of a time competing with pros who know these less technology dependent skills. Plus I don’t have the cred (or should it be old media penetration and saturation) of someone like Ethan so I’m already at a dis advantage in the ‘hit-getting’ contest.
This is not to say that a ‘production-values challenged’ vlog doesn’t have any value, but that maybe the playing field isn’t as level as it should be (especially not once people with name recognition and old media credentials start messing around with the technologies).
LikeLike
Uh hello people…isn’t it true that some of the ‘production values’ problem isn’t due to a lack of whiz-bang geek toys (or a lack of proficiency in using them) but in the talents of the people themselves making them?!?! You know, old school things, like acting, voice-over work, music composition, script/screenwriting, editing, etc. You can’t fully dispense with the importance of the meatware here.
If I go out and shoot a video on DV, no way is it going to be as ‘good’ as say what Ethan Hawke could do on DV (you can check out the film ‘Chelsea Walls’ if you’re interested in the history of DV usage by the industry). I’m not trained in acting, voice work, scoring film or video and even if I’ve got the latest in DV cameras and editing suites etc plus what I thing is an interesting script, I’m going to have a heck of a time competing with pros who know these less technology dependent skills. Plus I don’t have the cred (or should it be old media penetration and saturation) of someone like Ethan so I’m already at a dis advantage in the ‘hit-getting’ contest.
This is not to say that a ‘production-values challenged’ vlog doesn’t have any value, but that maybe the playing field isn’t as level as it should be (especially not once people with name recognition and old media credentials start messing around with the technologies).
LikeLike
My only complaint about the work on C9, which is completely overshadowed by its positives, so please take this complain in persepective is the poor audio.
Its one of the reasons I’m not as eager to view videos there as I once was.
There is nothing more frustrating than not being able to hear someone because
1 – The microphone , assuming there is one, is no where near them
2 – Someone’s shirt is making love to the microphone
3 – There’s some god-awful static , hiss, or other noise in the background
4 – Scoble is laughing (at his own joke).
louder than the speaker who is trying to talk and ignore the inane distraction. (sorry :))
LikeLike
My only complaint about the work on C9, which is completely overshadowed by its positives, so please take this complain in persepective is the poor audio.
Its one of the reasons I’m not as eager to view videos there as I once was.
There is nothing more frustrating than not being able to hear someone because
1 – The microphone , assuming there is one, is no where near them
2 – Someone’s shirt is making love to the microphone
3 – There’s some god-awful static , hiss, or other noise in the background
4 – Scoble is laughing (at his own joke).
louder than the speaker who is trying to talk and ignore the inane distraction. (sorry :))
LikeLike
Don’t quite agree with you, Mr. Scoble. And, it may be a matter of semantics. In particular, the question is the meaning of “production values.” I see it more a function of the skills to create compelling content, not necessarily exorbitant costs and lengthy meetings tied to production.
I reference this blog and conversation in my blog about the state of podcasts and vlogs here:
http://bradfuller.com/blog/2006/07/11/the-state-of-podcasts-vlogs/
LikeLike
Don’t quite agree with you, Mr. Scoble. And, it may be a matter of semantics. In particular, the question is the meaning of “production values.” I see it more a function of the skills to create compelling content, not necessarily exorbitant costs and lengthy meetings tied to production.
I reference this blog and conversation in my blog about the state of podcasts and vlogs here:
http://bradfuller.com/blog/2006/07/11/the-state-of-podcasts-vlogs/
LikeLike
I shot my first documentary with myself and another guy. It was on VHS with a on board mike except for the talking head. It was edited on a straight cuts only non-digital tape to tape machine. It won the Directors Prize at The Illinois Film & Video Festival & got on the David Wolper/IDA Student reel. NOt to brag because I have sort of allowed my career to go downhill but I have to say story is 90%. I go to Blockbuster and see these qo million dollar bore-fests and although it is even hard to make a bad movie, if you were going to get 10 million wouldn’t you want to make one from the heart and if you don’t have it your heart, get a screenplay from someone who has something to say.
Make films about what you know. But in the end I wished I had done a 90 minute film on this subject and shot it on 35mm. However in documentary , subjects tend to shut down in front of big crews.
LikeLike
I shot my first documentary with myself and another guy. It was on VHS with a on board mike except for the talking head. It was edited on a straight cuts only non-digital tape to tape machine. It won the Directors Prize at The Illinois Film & Video Festival & got on the David Wolper/IDA Student reel. NOt to brag because I have sort of allowed my career to go downhill but I have to say story is 90%. I go to Blockbuster and see these qo million dollar bore-fests and although it is even hard to make a bad movie, if you were going to get 10 million wouldn’t you want to make one from the heart and if you don’t have it your heart, get a screenplay from someone who has something to say.
Make films about what you know. But in the end I wished I had done a 90 minute film on this subject and shot it on 35mm. However in documentary , subjects tend to shut down in front of big crews.
LikeLike