Published by Robert Scoble
I give you a front-row seat on the future. Focusing most of my efforts now on next-generation augmented reality and artificial intelligence, AKA "mixed reality."
SUBSCRIBE TO MY NEWSLETTER: http://clevermoe.com/scobleizer-news/
BUY OUR NEW BOOK: https://www.amazon.com/Fourth-Transformation-Robert-Scoble/dp/1539894444 "The Fourth Transformation: How augmented reality and artificial intelligence will change everything."
WATCH MY LATEST SPEECHES:
State of VR with Philip Rosedale (done in VR itself, very cool): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2zAA1EVGUZU
At GEOINT, June 2017: http://trajectorymagazine.com/glimpse-new-world/
Augmented World Expo, June 2017: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l4xHILvLD8E
At Leade.rs, April 2017: https://youtu.be/52_0JshgjXI
+++++++++++
BIO:
Scoble gives you a front-row seat on the future.
Literally. He had the first ride in the first Tesla. Siri was launched in his house. He's been the first to share all sorts of technologies and companies with you, from Flipboard to Pandora to Instagram.
Today he's focusing on mixed reality, AKA "next-generation augmented reality" which will include a new user interface for EVERYTHING in your life (IoT, Smart Cities, driverless cars, robots, drones, etc).
That's based on his view thanks to his past experience as futurist at Rackspace.
Best place to find Scoble? On his Facebook profile at https://www.facebook.com/RobertScoble
He has been a technology blogger since 2000, was one of five people who built Microsoft's Channel 9 video blog/community, worked at Fast Company Magazine running its TV efforts, and has been part of technology media businesses since 1993.
++++++++
SPEAKER PITCH:
Apple and Facebook now have revealed their Augmented Reality strategies, which means your business needs one too. Rely on Robert Scoble, the world's top authority on AR, to bring to your conference what businesses should do next.
SPEECH ABSTRACT #1:
TITLE: The Fourth Transformation: What's next in mixed reality (AR and AI) and the future of technology?
Here's an example of this talk at Leade.rs in Paris in April, 2017: https://youtu.be/52_0JshgjXI
Why "the Fourth Transformation?"
Soon we will have phones and glasses that do full on augmented reality. Everything you look at will potentially be augmented. This world is coming in late 2017 with a new iPhone from Apple, amongst other products. Microsoft is betting everything on its HoloLens glasses that do mixed reality and the industry is spending many billions of dollars in R&D and funding new companies like Magic Leap.
This future will be the user interface for IoT, Smart Cities, autonomous cars, robots, drones, and your TV.
This is a big deal and Robert will take you through what mixed reality is and how it will change every business.
Learn more about Robert's speaking style and contact his agent at http://odemanagement.com/robert-scoble/Robert-Scoble.html
++++++++
SPEECH ABSTRACT #2:
"The Next Two Clicks of Moore's Law."
Over the next four years, or two clicks of Moore's Law, a ton about our technology world will change. Scoble will bring you the best from his travels visiting R&D labs, startups, and innovators around the world.
He views the world through his rose-colored-mixed-reality glasses, which will be the new user interface for self driving cars, Smart Cities, IoT, and many other things in our world.
He'll send you off with some lessons for companies both large and small.
++++++++
SPEECH ABSTRACT #3:
"Personalized Meaning: What is Augmented Reality For?"
As we enter a far more technological world where even cars drive themselves, I predict we'll see a blowback toward the analog, more authentic world.
What role does augmented reality play in both worlds?
Get Scoble's insight into where augmented reality is going, see tons of real-world demos, and understand what he means by 'personalized meaning.'
CONTACT:
If you are looking to contact me, email is best: scobleizer@gmail.com.
++++++++
ENDORSEMENTS:
IZEA Top 25 Tech Influencers: https://izea.com/2017/07/07/25-top-tech-influencers/
Time: One of the top 140 Twitterers!
FT: One of the five most influential Twitterers!
Inc. Top 5 on list of Tech Power Players You Need to Know: http://www.inc.com/john-rampton/30-power-players-in-tech-you-need-to-know.html
Next Reality: #4 on top 50 AR influencer list: https://next.reality.news/news/nr50-next-realitys-50-people-watch-augmented-mixed-reality-0177454/
View all posts by Robert Scoble
Maybe it has a different algorithm 🙂 It links to sites with style and substance 😉
On a more serious note – Why don’t people talk about a9? I don’t use it, but I’m curious to know.
I did your test there and found it to be on par with google.
LikeLike
Maybe it has a different algorithm 🙂 It links to sites with style and substance 😉
On a more serious note – Why don’t people talk about a9? I don’t use it, but I’m curious to know.
I did your test there and found it to be on par with google.
LikeLike
For my ego search, it is MSN that almost gets it right.
http://search.msn.com/results.aspx?q=sam+ruby
http://www.google.com/search?q=sam+ruby
LikeLike
For my ego search, it is MSN that almost gets it right.
http://search.msn.com/results.aspx?q=sam+ruby
http://www.google.com/search?q=sam+ruby
LikeLike
Same here; MSN has got it spot on!
http://search.msn.com/results.aspx?q=navdeep+shergill&FORM=QBHP
as opposed to google
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=navdeep+shergill&btnG=Google+Search
LikeLike
Same here; MSN has got it spot on!
http://search.msn.com/results.aspx?q=navdeep+shergill&FORM=QBHP
as opposed to google
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=navdeep+shergill&btnG=Google+Search
LikeLike
The reason that a9.com’s results are on par with Google’s is that, for the most part, the a9.com results ARE Google’s – the partnership is not yet severed. The first page of results appears completely identical for Scoble.
Scobleizer.com is on the second page of Ask.com. On the Scoble query, I think that the main difference appears to be the age of the incoming links; naturally, Scoble’s old site still has more links than the newer site. I wouldn’t be surprised if Google bumps the newer site higher, either manually or by checking which largely-identical site is getting links that are more current. I agree that Google’s results are more useful for people looking for the current Scoble site.
Querying my own name in both engines, though, gives me results that, objectively considered, favor Ask. My last name is pretty doggone unusual. Googling ‘klebe’ works out pretty well for me; on the basis of my nearly-unknown blog, I come out in third place. I think it’s well known, and obvious in this case, that Google overweights blogs in its results. Compare with Ask’s results for ‘Klebe’ – the first page references a well-published scholar, an artist, an actress who’s been on Law & Order, and so on. I have to say that that’s just plain better.
Blogger ego searches fare very well on Google. Searches for well-known bloggers on Google will appear very accurate.
Searches for less-well-known bloggers on Google produce results that overweight blogs. Not that I’m unhappy about that…
If you want to see what Ask is great at, compare ‘Apache’ in Ask and Google, and think about which is going to be more useful to anyone but a technologist.
LikeLike
The reason that a9.com’s results are on par with Google’s is that, for the most part, the a9.com results ARE Google’s – the partnership is not yet severed. The first page of results appears completely identical for Scoble.
Scobleizer.com is on the second page of Ask.com. On the Scoble query, I think that the main difference appears to be the age of the incoming links; naturally, Scoble’s old site still has more links than the newer site. I wouldn’t be surprised if Google bumps the newer site higher, either manually or by checking which largely-identical site is getting links that are more current. I agree that Google’s results are more useful for people looking for the current Scoble site.
Querying my own name in both engines, though, gives me results that, objectively considered, favor Ask. My last name is pretty doggone unusual. Googling ‘klebe’ works out pretty well for me; on the basis of my nearly-unknown blog, I come out in third place. I think it’s well known, and obvious in this case, that Google overweights blogs in its results. Compare with Ask’s results for ‘Klebe’ – the first page references a well-published scholar, an artist, an actress who’s been on Law & Order, and so on. I have to say that that’s just plain better.
Blogger ego searches fare very well on Google. Searches for well-known bloggers on Google will appear very accurate.
Searches for less-well-known bloggers on Google produce results that overweight blogs. Not that I’m unhappy about that…
If you want to see what Ask is great at, compare ‘Apache’ in Ask and Google, and think about which is going to be more useful to anyone but a technologist.
LikeLike
My ranking:
Google
Yahoo
MSN
Ask
Why did I pick the way I did?
Google has a REALLY clean interface…
I picked Yahoo second because it’s also an easy URL to type… I don’t like it’s interface one bit and the results could use some work.
MSN comes in third. It’s fast, but typing in the URL is a pain in the rear, and there is something about the interface that I just don’t like. Maybe it’s the slightly smaller font size that’s used, maybe it’s the shaded area at the top, or the location of the search bar on the results page… I just can’t put my finger on it.
Ask is decent. I like it’s layout better than MSN and Yahoo — But not as good as Google. The results are okay, and the fact that I can preview a page seems cool. It comes in very close to MSN.
Overall, MSN is headed in the right direction. They need a new URL and a new interface design and that would just about do it.
LikeLike
My ranking:
Google
Yahoo
MSN
Ask
Why did I pick the way I did?
Google has a REALLY clean interface…
I picked Yahoo second because it’s also an easy URL to type… I don’t like it’s interface one bit and the results could use some work.
MSN comes in third. It’s fast, but typing in the URL is a pain in the rear, and there is something about the interface that I just don’t like. Maybe it’s the slightly smaller font size that’s used, maybe it’s the shaded area at the top, or the location of the search bar on the results page… I just can’t put my finger on it.
Ask is decent. I like it’s layout better than MSN and Yahoo — But not as good as Google. The results are okay, and the fact that I can preview a page seems cool. It comes in very close to MSN.
Overall, MSN is headed in the right direction. They need a new URL and a new interface design and that would just about do it.
LikeLike
Actually the numbers are correct.
Most of us prefer to read your old blog.
LikeLike
Actually the numbers are correct.
Most of us prefer to read your old blog.
LikeLike
I used your links to see what happened, then plugged “orcmid” into them. All but Ask wanted to know if I really meant “orchid” even though they had lots of its for “orcmid.” Only MSN avoided putting up adds assuming that I really did mean “orchid.”
What’s particularly nice, and getting better since I started using nofollow on internal site links, is that the searches find non-redundant material, often quite different material, but it is always pure “orcmid.” How about that. A genuine six-letter Internet brand. I didn’t have anything like that in mind at the time, but it is certainly cool.
Now I technorati tag “orcmid” too. But that’s because it is the most useful way of telling whether or not technorati has caught my taggings for a particular article. There are mystery discrepancies and this helps me look for patterns and see what it takes to have the tags be captured.
LikeLike
I used your links to see what happened, then plugged “orcmid” into them. All but Ask wanted to know if I really meant “orchid” even though they had lots of its for “orcmid.” Only MSN avoided putting up adds assuming that I really did mean “orchid.”
What’s particularly nice, and getting better since I started using nofollow on internal site links, is that the searches find non-redundant material, often quite different material, but it is always pure “orcmid.” How about that. A genuine six-letter Internet brand. I didn’t have anything like that in mind at the time, but it is certainly cool.
Now I technorati tag “orcmid” too. But that’s because it is the most useful way of telling whether or not technorati has caught my taggings for a particular article. There are mystery discrepancies and this helps me look for patterns and see what it takes to have the tags be captured.
LikeLike
I typed “Robert Scoble” in both Ask.com and Google. Ask.com returned your Wikipedia entry, alongwith your picture at the top of the search results. Though it didn’t have your wordpress blog listed in the top results.
Ask.com has been my new default search engine for the past few days. It seems to be better than Google.
LikeLike
I typed “Robert Scoble” in both Ask.com and Google. Ask.com returned your Wikipedia entry, alongwith your picture at the top of the search results. Though it didn’t have your wordpress blog listed in the top results.
Ask.com has been my new default search engine for the past few days. It seems to be better than Google.
LikeLike
My 2 cents. About a year ago I moved my blog from DotNetJunkies.com to CodeBetter.com. There’s some freak at Kimble.org, so “kimble” won’t get even close to me (mainly because there are a lot of Kimble’s with businesses). So I usually search on my name “Jay Kimble.” The results –
Google and MSN list my old blog number 1 (BTW, there is no content at DotNetJunkies anymore except a single post pointing to my codebetter blog). I guess maybe I’m not as popular anymore (even though I have done more in this last year than I did the first year blogging). BTW, both do list my new blog second
Oh yeah, ask.com? They hit it right on the number. Not only that but they ignore my old blog and even list some of the content from the old site that was moved.
So I guess we’re not in agreement on the ego search…
LikeLike
My 2 cents. About a year ago I moved my blog from DotNetJunkies.com to CodeBetter.com. There’s some freak at Kimble.org, so “kimble” won’t get even close to me (mainly because there are a lot of Kimble’s with businesses). So I usually search on my name “Jay Kimble.” The results –
Google and MSN list my old blog number 1 (BTW, there is no content at DotNetJunkies anymore except a single post pointing to my codebetter blog). I guess maybe I’m not as popular anymore (even though I have done more in this last year than I did the first year blogging). BTW, both do list my new blog second
Oh yeah, ask.com? They hit it right on the number. Not only that but they ignore my old blog and even list some of the content from the old site that was moved.
So I guess we’re not in agreement on the ego search…
LikeLike
you seem to be making a huge assumption that “PageRank” is the only way and the only right way … i dont know if there is another algorithm which can work better .. but you have thousands of inbound links should have no bearing on you having a great page. Its an algorithm google used and it worked. With the advent of new technology and newer algorithms, it may be rendered useless someday. So I think this test of yours can be very flawed in testing relevance. Relevance is a qualitative measure and the only good way is a human eye survey.
LikeLike
you seem to be making a huge assumption that “PageRank” is the only way and the only right way … i dont know if there is another algorithm which can work better .. but you have thousands of inbound links should have no bearing on you having a great page. Its an algorithm google used and it worked. With the advent of new technology and newer algorithms, it may be rendered useless someday. So I think this test of yours can be very flawed in testing relevance. Relevance is a qualitative measure and the only good way is a human eye survey.
LikeLike
Actually, my pet peeve is that I share a name with a former Prime Minister of Ireland. I should _not_ rank as highly as I do compared to him. (Especially on the Google.ie searches.)
LikeLike
Actually, my pet peeve is that I share a name with a former Prime Minister of Ireland. I should _not_ rank as highly as I do compared to him. (Especially on the Google.ie searches.)
LikeLike
a: true enough. But my old blog isn’t as relevant if you are searching for “Scoble” as my new one. Which is why this is an interesting relevance test.
Garrett: true if you’re talking “real world” relevance. The problem is, how can an algorithm tell that? The only thing it can go on is web relevance. And there you are definitely higher than anyone who doesn’t blog, including the Prime Minister of Ireland.
LikeLike
a: true enough. But my old blog isn’t as relevant if you are searching for “Scoble” as my new one. Which is why this is an interesting relevance test.
Garrett: true if you’re talking “real world” relevance. The problem is, how can an algorithm tell that? The only thing it can go on is web relevance. And there you are definitely higher than anyone who doesn’t blog, including the Prime Minister of Ireland.
LikeLike
Hmm, for my last name, both Google and MSN put the home page of my site at the top of the list.
But Yahoo puts a specific page at the top, which is just some random photos I took at a bar in Spokane three years ago. I’m intrigued by the inconsistency, but can come up with no explanation. According to Google, there are no inbound links to that page, from anywhere. So why does Yahoo put it first?
LikeLike
Hmm, for my last name, both Google and MSN put the home page of my site at the top of the list.
But Yahoo puts a specific page at the top, which is just some random photos I took at a bar in Spokane three years ago. I’m intrigued by the inconsistency, but can come up with no explanation. According to Google, there are no inbound links to that page, from anywhere. So why does Yahoo put it first?
LikeLike
I thought Ask was using Google’s engine… or did they stop using it?
LikeLike
I thought Ask was using Google’s engine… or did they stop using it?
LikeLike
Dude: they haven’t used it for a while.
LikeLike
Dude: they haven’t used it for a while.
LikeLike
a9 has the best interface:
http://generic.a9.com/robert%20scoble
Click on that and then click on “wikipedia” and “images”. After that, all of your searches are very cleanly displayed with images and wikipedia (which I find is useful 90 percent of the time.)
I don’t see live.com or msn.com being able to combine search results this way.
LikeLike
a9 has the best interface:
http://generic.a9.com/robert%20scoble
Click on that and then click on “wikipedia” and “images”. After that, all of your searches are very cleanly displayed with images and wikipedia (which I find is useful 90 percent of the time.)
I don’t see live.com or msn.com being able to combine search results this way.
LikeLike
Well, if you want the best search you gotta use gada.be: http://gada.be/d/scoble
LikeLike
Well, if you want the best search you gotta use gada.be: http://gada.be/d/scoble
LikeLike
Things I discovered trying this,
MSN has by blog at #1 Yeah
Google has it at #2 Eh
There is a country music singer in Australia name Ian Muir
One of the dwarf actors from Time Bandits was named Ian Muir
A rugby player named Ian Muir beat up a talkshow host in the UK, proving that I’m not the only angry Scotsman named Ian Muir.
Overall I have to agree that MSN seems to be more accurate for what I’m searching for than Google. However, the suggest feature that Google created has kept it as my primary search engine.
LikeLike
Things I discovered trying this,
MSN has by blog at #1 Yeah
Google has it at #2 Eh
There is a country music singer in Australia name Ian Muir
One of the dwarf actors from Time Bandits was named Ian Muir
A rugby player named Ian Muir beat up a talkshow host in the UK, proving that I’m not the only angry Scotsman named Ian Muir.
Overall I have to agree that MSN seems to be more accurate for what I’m searching for than Google. However, the suggest feature that Google created has kept it as my primary search engine.
LikeLike
Well, if you want the best search…
I thought you were an evangelist. Can you imagine Jimmy Swaggart saying, “Well, yeah, if you want the BEST god, go to Vishnu…that guy has arms up the YINGYANG!”
LikeLike
Well, if you want the best search…
I thought you were an evangelist. Can you imagine Jimmy Swaggart saying, “Well, yeah, if you want the BEST god, go to Vishnu…that guy has arms up the YINGYANG!”
LikeLike
…and with his M$FT lineage, Scoble ensures that his MSN cronies get his “ego search” correct (relevancy) every time.
That way he can point to his company’s trumped-up empirical/statistical accuracy vs. the search sites that have actual mindshare.
Nice try, Scoble.
LikeLike
…and with his M$FT lineage, Scoble ensures that his MSN cronies get his “ego search” correct (relevancy) every time.
That way he can point to his company’s trumped-up empirical/statistical accuracy vs. the search sites that have actual mindshare.
Nice try, Scoble.
LikeLike
namehere: you misunderstand what a technology evangelist does. A TE is not a religious guy. A TE is paid to help developers build software for the next version of Windows (or whatever platform is next).
One thing I’ve gotta do to be able to do my job well is to keep my credibility. So if Google is still better, I’m gonna say that it is. If my management doesn’t like that then they can keep working until it’s just so obvious that MSN is better than no one like Jay Bailey can say it isn’t.
Jay: MSN doesn’t adjust its algorithms just for me. That’s why we have open comments here so you can report your own results. My ego search isn’t the only one getting better on MSN lately.
LikeLike
namehere: you misunderstand what a technology evangelist does. A TE is not a religious guy. A TE is paid to help developers build software for the next version of Windows (or whatever platform is next).
One thing I’ve gotta do to be able to do my job well is to keep my credibility. So if Google is still better, I’m gonna say that it is. If my management doesn’t like that then they can keep working until it’s just so obvious that MSN is better than no one like Jay Bailey can say it isn’t.
Jay: MSN doesn’t adjust its algorithms just for me. That’s why we have open comments here so you can report your own results. My ego search isn’t the only one getting better on MSN lately.
LikeLike
Well, “gada” may be (by a single standard–results) the “best” search. But it clearly isn’t the “best” by overall usability. I was an early adopter of google for the primary reason that it had a sparse interface. Altavista was similar, but google’s results seemed better–and so, that secondary consideration tipped the balance.
My current favorite is a9, and when I sit at a coworker’s machine and they have…ugh…google as the default search, I’m screwed up. It’s all the interface.
Now, msn–I take one look at it, and that’s enough. It’s clearly a mess. Live.com is better, but it has some ajax weirdness to it. If the windows (including the top search bar) could be manipulated like Windows OS Windows, I’d use it.
LikeLike
Well, “gada” may be (by a single standard–results) the “best” search. But it clearly isn’t the “best” by overall usability. I was an early adopter of google for the primary reason that it had a sparse interface. Altavista was similar, but google’s results seemed better–and so, that secondary consideration tipped the balance.
My current favorite is a9, and when I sit at a coworker’s machine and they have…ugh…google as the default search, I’m screwed up. It’s all the interface.
Now, msn–I take one look at it, and that’s enough. It’s clearly a mess. Live.com is better, but it has some ajax weirdness to it. If the windows (including the top search bar) could be manipulated like Windows OS Windows, I’d use it.
LikeLike
Networking: Convergence on Wall Street
Federal regulations and a stream of lawsuits by New York’s exceptionally ambitious Attorney General Elliott Spitzer seem to be having an unintended consequence on Wall Street — a surprising boom in deployment of new, converged networking technologies in the financial-services sector, experts tell United Press International’s Networking.
Hemmed in by new requirements to keep every e-mail, instant message, and, perhaps, even all Voice over Internet Protocol conversations on file to ensure regulators in Washington that they don’t unduly propagandize stocks, Wall Street firms are buying new equipment to store diaries of their daily digital doings — forever. This is driving equipment sales at technology vendors and bringing about a convergence of networking and storage technologies. That, most assuredly, is not hype. By Gene Koprowski
LikeLike
Networking: Convergence on Wall Street
Federal regulations and a stream of lawsuits by New York’s exceptionally ambitious Attorney General Elliott Spitzer seem to be having an unintended consequence on Wall Street — a surprising boom in deployment of new, converged networking technologies in the financial-services sector, experts tell United Press International’s Networking.
Hemmed in by new requirements to keep every e-mail, instant message, and, perhaps, even all Voice over Internet Protocol conversations on file to ensure regulators in Washington that they don’t unduly propagandize stocks, Wall Street firms are buying new equipment to store diaries of their daily digital doings — forever. This is driving equipment sales at technology vendors and bringing about a convergence of networking and storage technologies. That, most assuredly, is not hype. By Gene Koprowski
LikeLike
Dear Scobles,
I just finished watching another episode from “Desperate Housewives”, where Lynette talked with her husband ex-girl friend, saying something like that “We are the sturdy team. I am sure no one will separate us.” On this the ex-girl answered:” if you are so sure, so why you came to say that to me”
So, Scobles, you remind me Lynette, if you are so sure in Microsoft, why you are always checking it against Google and yahoo.
I am personally devoted to Microsoft, adore Microsoft’s technology, and broaden knowledge of my colleagues by what I know. But with all this I don’t disgrace other competitors. Wicked Game, Scobles.
Alfred,
DBA, MSN (Microsoft Network), Israel.
P.S. By the way, what I looked for, best results to my ego gave Yahoo.
P.P.S. It looks by you April 1 joke, that you are obsessed by Google.Shame to you, really. And you are one of the judges of “Made in Express” Contest. How did they choose you,- a big mistake!
LikeLike
Dear Scobles,
I just finished watching another episode from “Desperate Housewives”, where Lynette talked with her husband ex-girl friend, saying something like that “We are the sturdy team. I am sure no one will separate us.” On this the ex-girl answered:” if you are so sure, so why you came to say that to me”
So, Scobles, you remind me Lynette, if you are so sure in Microsoft, why you are always checking it against Google and yahoo.
I am personally devoted to Microsoft, adore Microsoft’s technology, and broaden knowledge of my colleagues by what I know. But with all this I don’t disgrace other competitors. Wicked Game, Scobles.
Alfred,
DBA, MSN (Microsoft Network), Israel.
P.S. By the way, what I looked for, best results to my ego gave Yahoo.
P.P.S. It looks by you April 1 joke, that you are obsessed by Google.Shame to you, really. And you are one of the judges of “Made in Express” Contest. How did they choose you,- a big mistake!
LikeLike
i agree. a9 has by far the best interface. they realise that looking for information on the web is not a single space problem. we are looking for different types of information and all combined on one page like a9 does is very very useful.
LikeLike
i agree. a9 has by far the best interface. they realise that looking for information on the web is not a single space problem. we are looking for different types of information and all combined on one page like a9 does is very very useful.
LikeLike
A search for a Microsoft employee on a Microsoft search engine gives better results than a different engine…. News at 11!
Nice one Scoble.
LikeLike
A search for a Microsoft employee on a Microsoft search engine gives better results than a different engine…. News at 11!
Nice one Scoble.
LikeLike
Alfred: Google has most of the search engine usage. Yes, when you’re #3 you BETTER be obsessed with what the competition is doing in order to find a way to give our customers a better example.
Jon: it’s not just my result. I just wanted people to start on their own path of self discovery.
LikeLike
Alfred: Google has most of the search engine usage. Yes, when you’re #3 you BETTER be obsessed with what the competition is doing in order to find a way to give our customers a better example.
Jon: it’s not just my result. I just wanted people to start on their own path of self discovery.
LikeLike
It seems that Google has been slipping lately and the ego test is not the only indicator. I remember when Yahoo was on the top of its game and then it was slowly corrupted by advertisers. Google is slowly being taken over in the same way. I have not used ASK.com since the early days of the internet, but here lately I have been using it and MSN more. I am getting slightly better relevancy, but I still use Google. The untold shame is that since Microsoft.com switched search engines for their site(now they use the MSN search technology)I have been forced to use Google to find the same pages I used to find with the search engine that was originally used for Microsoft.com. As someone newly into the tech field this has frustrated me to no end. The good news is that with IE7, at least I can stack multiple providers and search five search engines at once and tab between results and find hopefully within one of them the results I am looking for. Test this for relevancy between MSN and Google. Search for “using exchange server with share point services” and watch what both search engines pull up. One will give you an ad for using them together and the other will give you a technet article. Hmmm, which one is better?
LikeLike
It seems that Google has been slipping lately and the ego test is not the only indicator. I remember when Yahoo was on the top of its game and then it was slowly corrupted by advertisers. Google is slowly being taken over in the same way. I have not used ASK.com since the early days of the internet, but here lately I have been using it and MSN more. I am getting slightly better relevancy, but I still use Google. The untold shame is that since Microsoft.com switched search engines for their site(now they use the MSN search technology)I have been forced to use Google to find the same pages I used to find with the search engine that was originally used for Microsoft.com. As someone newly into the tech field this has frustrated me to no end. The good news is that with IE7, at least I can stack multiple providers and search five search engines at once and tab between results and find hopefully within one of them the results I am looking for. Test this for relevancy between MSN and Google. Search for “using exchange server with share point services” and watch what both search engines pull up. One will give you an ad for using them together and the other will give you a technet article. Hmmm, which one is better?
LikeLike
Robert,
According to Scott Johnson you’ve been doing ego searches for ever and a day. 🙂 He mentions your name coming up on Feedster logs searching for your own name.
http://www.venturevoice.com/2006/04/scott_johnson_of_ookles.html
As for searching on MSN or Google. I always get what I want from Google, so I wouldn’t even consider looking elsewhere. When it starts failing, I’ll consider something else.
LikeLike
Robert,
According to Scott Johnson you’ve been doing ego searches for ever and a day. 🙂 He mentions your name coming up on Feedster logs searching for your own name.
http://www.venturevoice.com/2006/04/scott_johnson_of_ookles.html
As for searching on MSN or Google. I always get what I want from Google, so I wouldn’t even consider looking elsewhere. When it starts failing, I’ll consider something else.
LikeLike
I’m not exactly the biggest fan of Mr. Scoble, but I have to admit that I frequently check my name in Feedster and Technorati too.
I also check-in with my Google Analytics almost daily. Which is neat because I’ve discovered a surprising number of my blog visitors are from the UK.
LikeLike
I’m not exactly the biggest fan of Mr. Scoble, but I have to admit that I frequently check my name in Feedster and Technorati too.
I also check-in with my Google Analytics almost daily. Which is neat because I’ve discovered a surprising number of my blog visitors are from the UK.
LikeLike
Does that mean that you will be using MSN from now on?
LikeLike
Does that mean that you will be using MSN from now on?
LikeLike
MSN satisfies my ego search much better than Google, as well.
LikeLike
MSN satisfies my ego search much better than Google, as well.
LikeLike
antwerp: no. Every search I do hits both MSN and Google (I have a special tool that was created for us to do that). So far I can’t say that MSN is good enough to use. It’s getting close, though, it sure has gotten better in the past six months. It used to be that Google won every search I did. Now MSN is winning about 30% of them. The ego search is an important one, though, to me cause it’s the one search I do every few months just to see what comes up and this is the first time MSN has won that particular search.
Interesting times ahead for the search industry!
LikeLike
antwerp: no. Every search I do hits both MSN and Google (I have a special tool that was created for us to do that). So far I can’t say that MSN is good enough to use. It’s getting close, though, it sure has gotten better in the past six months. It used to be that Google won every search I did. Now MSN is winning about 30% of them. The ego search is an important one, though, to me cause it’s the one search I do every few months just to see what comes up and this is the first time MSN has won that particular search.
Interesting times ahead for the search industry!
LikeLike
I love this site. Good work…
LikeLike
I love this site. Good work…
LikeLike