Office 12 floats Paul Thurrott’s boat

I ran into Paul Thurrott tonight at one of those stick-50-companies-into-a-room-with-beer-and-finger-food-and-pour-press-people-in parties and we got to talking about Office 12. He says Office 12 is both shocking and exciting. And a few other things in his part 1 of “Inside Office 12.”

Advertisements

52 thoughts on “Office 12 floats Paul Thurrott’s boat

  1. Thurrott?

    Jeez, that guy has been so wrong the last couple a years about apple, it’s hilarious (actually, pathetic is a better term).

    Hope he’s a bit more accurate on the Office front.

    Like

  2. Thurrott?

    Jeez, that guy has been so wrong the last couple a years about apple, it’s hilarious (actually, pathetic is a better term).

    Hope he’s a bit more accurate on the Office front.

    Like

  3. Apple’s biggest problem is it’s lunatic fringe (it’s fans), Microsoft should be grateful it only has Paul.

    Like

  4. “shocking and exciting”?? Isn’t office “productivity” software? office is as exciting as an IBM mainframe.

    Like

  5. “shocking and exciting”?? Isn’t office “productivity” software? office is as exciting as an IBM mainframe.

    Like

  6. Let’s hope that Office 12 teaches Gerry the difference between “its” and “it’s”. Now that would be really cool.

    Like

  7. Let’s hope that Office 12 teaches Gerry the difference between “its” and “it’s”. Now that would be really cool.

    Like

  8. Ron: I totally disagree. This version of Office is quite different and quite better than what we’ve seen before.

    Like

  9. Ron: I totally disagree. This version of Office is quite different and quite better than what we’ve seen before.

    Like

  10. Thurott is a technologist, not a user.

    Task-oriented interfaces were “invented” back in Office XP (perhaps that explains the XP in the name) with smart tags and task panes. This is getting fixed somewhat. Unfortunately a whole new class of problems are making their way. Example : it’s harder to know what is the actual selection between the highlights in the ribbon, chunk, actual content, and floatie. To me it’s a mess. Your mileage may vary, however.

    Of course, the question is : what’s new? If people found out that they would better off simply sticking to Wordpad for most of their needs, which is the best way to ensure their documents can be read decades from now, I wonder what they should think about MS initiatives anyway…

    And of course, as a user, the UI being reshuffled, it means the IT department must provision big retraining budgets. Of course, as file formats are now incompatible, it means IT must also provision for the equivalent of the Office95 / Office97 file format mess (even if MS is backing their ass saying a converter will be made available).

    Will be interesting to see how it comes out. Especially when there are so much thiner, better (even free) offerings out there.

    Like

  11. Thurott is a technologist, not a user.

    Task-oriented interfaces were “invented” back in Office XP (perhaps that explains the XP in the name) with smart tags and task panes. This is getting fixed somewhat. Unfortunately a whole new class of problems are making their way. Example : it’s harder to know what is the actual selection between the highlights in the ribbon, chunk, actual content, and floatie. To me it’s a mess. Your mileage may vary, however.

    Of course, the question is : what’s new? If people found out that they would better off simply sticking to Wordpad for most of their needs, which is the best way to ensure their documents can be read decades from now, I wonder what they should think about MS initiatives anyway…

    And of course, as a user, the UI being reshuffled, it means the IT department must provision big retraining budgets. Of course, as file formats are now incompatible, it means IT must also provision for the equivalent of the Office95 / Office97 file format mess (even if MS is backing their ass saying a converter will be made available).

    Will be interesting to see how it comes out. Especially when there are so much thiner, better (even free) offerings out there.

    Like

  12. anon: what’s new? The real question about Office 12 is “what’s old?”

    Watch for more videos on Channel 9. My favorites? PowerPoint’s new charting tool. Excel’s new Pivottable functionality. Word’s new Table and style functions. Outlook’s new meeting scheduler.

    Like

  13. anon: what’s new? The real question about Office 12 is “what’s old?”

    Watch for more videos on Channel 9. My favorites? PowerPoint’s new charting tool. Excel’s new Pivottable functionality. Word’s new Table and style functions. Outlook’s new meeting scheduler.

    Like

  14. Also I believe Office 12 is more setting the stage for future “more data centric” applications, and that will happen in future releases. Excel 12 seems headed towards this, and there is a likelihood some of the underlying libraries get shared among other Office apps. Not that there is anything wrong about it, just that people upgrading their Word/Spreadsheet apps should perhaps be told that they are moving towards what’s poised to become a BI tool instead. And a Windows-only tool, for that matter.

    Like

  15. Also I believe Office 12 is more setting the stage for future “more data centric” applications, and that will happen in future releases. Excel 12 seems headed towards this, and there is a likelihood some of the underlying libraries get shared among other Office apps. Not that there is anything wrong about it, just that people upgrading their Word/Spreadsheet apps should perhaps be told that they are moving towards what’s poised to become a BI tool instead. And a Windows-only tool, for that matter.

    Like

  16. Charting? Humm, Scoble watch people crying at their UI become a pig. You’d surprised about what’s not changed for almost two decades in the charting engine area. Except default translucency, and bevel. Gotta love that, heh!

    Like

  17. Charting? Humm, Scoble watch people crying at their UI become a pig. You’d surprised about what’s not changed for almost two decades in the charting engine area. Except default translucency, and bevel. Gotta love that, heh!

    Like

  18. Christopher: I’m an evangelist. Shoot me.
    An evangelist is paid to get developers to build software for the next version of the platform. So, thank you for saying I’m doing my job.

    Like

  19. Christopher: I’m an evangelist. Shoot me.
    An evangelist is paid to get developers to build software for the next version of the platform. So, thank you for saying I’m doing my job.

    Like

  20. Robert, can you clarify how the Office 12 NDA works?

    I had to sign an NDA to get the O12 Beta. The NDA states that I cannot write about the product. It seems to me that Paul Thurrott is either violating his NDA, or he’s working with an unauthorized copy of the beta.

    Like

  21. Robert, can you clarify how the Office 12 NDA works?

    I had to sign an NDA to get the O12 Beta. The NDA states that I cannot write about the product. It seems to me that Paul Thurrott is either violating his NDA, or he’s working with an unauthorized copy of the beta.

    Like

  22. Robert…it may be easier for you and other geeks to use untrained.

    In the real world, where people have almost-strokes because a button on a toolbar moved?

    Office 12 will, not may, but will require at least a six month period so you can roll it out in rather large chunks, and train people as you do so. I’m not saying the new UI wasn’t needed, but the idea you won’t need training is a PR fantasy.

    Like

  23. Robert…it may be easier for you and other geeks to use untrained.

    In the real world, where people have almost-strokes because a button on a toolbar moved?

    Office 12 will, not may, but will require at least a six month period so you can roll it out in rather large chunks, and train people as you do so. I’m not saying the new UI wasn’t needed, but the idea you won’t need training is a PR fantasy.

    Like

  24. Where’s compatibility with Open Office?

    Stuff like an office suite needs to be rolled up and bundled with the OS. In today’s market, it doesn’t make sense to charge customers extra for this kind of functionality.

    Like

  25. Where’s compatibility with Open Office?

    Stuff like an office suite needs to be rolled up and bundled with the OS. In today’s market, it doesn’t make sense to charge customers extra for this kind of functionality.

    Like

  26. I think the training need point is moot, to a certain extent. People in organisations that run training courses for employees such as “How to use Word”, see running training courses for things like this as a positive. So, for example, rolling out Office 12 will be a nice “project” for IT Support and Human Resources departments to collaborate on for a year or two.

    Organisations that don’t need to run training courses for things like this, will find that their employees will figure things out in Office 12 pretty quickly, I suspect.

    Like

  27. I think the training need point is moot, to a certain extent. People in organisations that run training courses for employees such as “How to use Word”, see running training courses for things like this as a positive. So, for example, rolling out Office 12 will be a nice “project” for IT Support and Human Resources departments to collaborate on for a year or two.

    Organisations that don’t need to run training courses for things like this, will find that their employees will figure things out in Office 12 pretty quickly, I suspect.

    Like

  28. Really? Shocking! When has Paul NOT liked something Microsoft made? That would be news.

    ” It seems to me that Paul Thurrott is either violating his NDA, or he’s working with an unauthorized copy of the beta.”

    Or Microsoft lets a few “select” windows bigots trumpet their horn for pr and to create a buzz.

    Marketers! Marketers! Marketers!…

    Like

  29. Really? Shocking! When has Paul NOT liked something Microsoft made? That would be news.

    ” It seems to me that Paul Thurrott is either violating his NDA, or he’s working with an unauthorized copy of the beta.”

    Or Microsoft lets a few “select” windows bigots trumpet their horn for pr and to create a buzz.

    Marketers! Marketers! Marketers!…

    Like

  30. Things MS Office hasn’t fixed in 10+ years:
    1. text import in Excel is great, really, really great. Try bringing in unformatted data in OpenOffice 1 and you’ll see what I mean. But Office doesn’t like text documents and won’t let you work with them. This is backwards for most people who work with data in a mixed environment (like everybody outside Redmond). I don’t expect OpenOffice support, but come on. Everybody uses data in text format. I don’t need error messages constantly while saving. Just give me one when I do something in Excel that can’t be saved to text format.
    2. Save dialog is inconsistent with extensions – if I save as text.csv, but I don’t use quotation marks, I get text.csv.txt, etc.
    3. Can I have post-it notes, Calendar and tasks enabled for home use without needing to setup up Outlook? Shouldn’t these things be in the OS?
    4. I’d like a vi-compatible mode for the editors in your IDEs.
    5. Actually, I’m not sure about this one, is VBA getting updated? Is there a plan? Can we know this upfront?
    6. It’s time for some housekeeping. Start with the ridiculous WordPerfect 5.1 compatibility options in Word. End with cleaning up the gi-normous Outlook options dialog box.

    Like

  31. Things MS Office hasn’t fixed in 10+ years:
    1. text import in Excel is great, really, really great. Try bringing in unformatted data in OpenOffice 1 and you’ll see what I mean. But Office doesn’t like text documents and won’t let you work with them. This is backwards for most people who work with data in a mixed environment (like everybody outside Redmond). I don’t expect OpenOffice support, but come on. Everybody uses data in text format. I don’t need error messages constantly while saving. Just give me one when I do something in Excel that can’t be saved to text format.
    2. Save dialog is inconsistent with extensions – if I save as text.csv, but I don’t use quotation marks, I get text.csv.txt, etc.
    3. Can I have post-it notes, Calendar and tasks enabled for home use without needing to setup up Outlook? Shouldn’t these things be in the OS?
    4. I’d like a vi-compatible mode for the editors in your IDEs.
    5. Actually, I’m not sure about this one, is VBA getting updated? Is there a plan? Can we know this upfront?
    6. It’s time for some housekeeping. Start with the ridiculous WordPerfect 5.1 compatibility options in Word. End with cleaning up the gi-normous Outlook options dialog box.

    Like

  32. I’d prefer a cheaper version of Office 12 where I can remove the functions I don’t want in it. I’d hate to pay big bucks for useless features. Let’s hope it can also sync well enough with PDAs like my Eten M600. I’m just sick of it hanging like a dead rat during the syncing process

    Like

  33. I’d prefer a cheaper version of Office 12 where I can remove the functions I don’t want in it. I’d hate to pay big bucks for useless features. Let’s hope it can also sync well enough with PDAs like my Eten M600. I’m just sick of it hanging like a dead rat during the syncing process

    Like

Comments are closed.