Google announces feed API

Niall Kennedy, of Technorati, has the news that Google will release a feed API in early 2006.

Here’s another note to Bill Gates, Steve Ballmer, and Ray Ozzie. Hey, I asked you guys to acquire NewsGator three months ago. If you had done that you would have taken the wind out of Google’s sails. But now that Google has a feed API, we’ll need one too and right now NewsGator looks pretty good. Yeah, I know, we have RSS-SSE coming, and we have some Groovy other stuff coming too, but that’s not here yet and it’s hard to get developers excited about a new and unproven API (Google has its work cut out for it too because they don’t have that many RSS users yet. Emphasis on yet).

Yeah, I know that NewsGator has its problems too. Now, we do know that NewsGator’s API is too difficult to use. Why do we know that? Cause Dare Obasanjo (one of our developers who works on MSN Spaces backend and also does the excellent RSS Bandit in his 20% free time) is having troubles figuring it out. Dare writes about the Google news here.

Let’s be honest. We’d rebuild NewsGator from scratch anyway. That’s what big companies usually do after acquiring companies. But, it’s a lot easier to rebuild something that’s already done than have 500 meetings with seven groups figuring out what to do from scratch. What’s the opportunity cost of doing that?

Let’s look at the case for NewsGator again. They own four out of the six most used aggregators. They have the leading Outlook aggregator. Yeah, we’re doing our own in Office 12, but let’s be honest, how long will it be before that gets to more than 50% usage? I’d guess 2010. And even then there are lots of people who’ll still have Outlook 2003, and older Outlook clients, who’ll need to read feeds. Yeah, Attensa is out there with a good competitor too, but Attensa doesn’t have an API. I bet they’ll sign onto Google’s API (or they’ll be bribed with some of Google’s money).

Let’s look at the Mac. NewsGator owns NetNewsWire. It’s the best feed reader on the Mac — by far. Buying NewsGator would rejuvenate our MacBU. The Macintosh is gaining in market share and if Apple announces a nice Intel-based portable computer in January watch things go up even faster.

Now, let’s look at Media Center. A very high percentage of all PCs sold are actually Media Center Editions. Now, who has an aggregator for that? NewsGator again. Why is that important? Well, look at Chris Pirillo’s house. He has an HDTV in his family room. He has an Xbox 360. And he has a Media Center in his office. What was one of the first things he showed me? His Media Center playing on his Xbox’s screen. Now, imagine if NewsGator was pulling down podcasts. If it was going off to the BBC and pulling in pictures and news. If it were going to his Flickr feeds and pulling down his friend’s photos in live time.

Now, switch over to my sooopppeerrr doooopppeeerrr new SmartPhone. Who has an aggregator for that? A few companies, but NewsGator has a Web service that shows me feeds. I like it a lot.

OK, now we are still a company that cares about regular old Windows, right? After all, we’re shipping a new version of Windows next year. So, who has the best aggregator for Windows? NewsGator again. With FeedDemon.

To put a little icing on the cake, NewsGator is the only RSS syndication system that hooks into Microsoft Exchange that I know about.

You’re not on any of these? Well, did you know NewsGator also has a Web client that’s getting raves? I like it better than Bloglines (which is one of the popular feed readers that NewsGator doesn’t own).

Oh, and here’s even more icing: on top of all this NewsGator does blog search and does it better than many of the more popular “blog search” engines. Why? Cause it searches YOUR feeds (which don’t include all the blog spam that hit other engines).

All this stuff is synchronized. Read a feed on your Mac, it marks it as read on Windows, and on SmartPhone, on the Web, on the Media Center, and in Outlook.

Anyway, if you were Bill/Steve/Ray what company would you want to acquire?

Advertisement

110 thoughts on “Google announces feed API

  1. I’m starting to get the feeling you like a specific product here… You seem to be laying subtle hints that MSFT should acquire somebody, but I just can’t put my finger on who it is.

    Like

  2. I’m starting to get the feeling you like a specific product here… You seem to be laying subtle hints that MSFT should acquire somebody, but I just can’t put my finger on who it is.

    Like

  3. Robert, which ship vehicle would you propose such an acquisition would go out in? Or do you think this would be in its own product? Or, perhaps, free?

    Like

  4. Hey Robert – you pre-announcing the take up rate for Office 12 already? Some crystal ball you’ve got there. And when was the last time M&A discussions took place over blogs? Could be a first…

    Like

  5. Robert, which ship vehicle would you propose such an acquisition would go out in? Or do you think this would be in its own product? Or, perhaps, free?

    Like

  6. Hey Robert – you pre-announcing the take up rate for Office 12 already? Some crystal ball you’ve got there. And when was the last time M&A discussions took place over blogs? Could be a first…

    Like

  7. Robert you pretty much summed it up perfectly.

    If I was in charge of M&A I would have purchased AOL and Newsgator a long time ago.

    I would also buy Divx networks. They have a fantastic codec, that everyone who pirates loves, and it’s just so… nice!

    Like

  8. Robert you pretty much summed it up perfectly.

    If I was in charge of M&A I would have purchased AOL and Newsgator a long time ago.

    I would also buy Divx networks. They have a fantastic codec, that everyone who pirates loves, and it’s just so… nice!

    Like

  9. Dahowlett: actually, I think uptake on this version will be a lot faster than that, but I wanted to be very conservative.

    Richard: that certainly would be an interesting process!

    Hep: that’s a real interesting question. Parts of it certainly could be free. We do have a whole new services strategy here and the MSN folks need more advertising inventory to sell.

    But, I think it could be a cool new part of Office. That’s my gut, anyway.

    Like

  10. Dahowlett: actually, I think uptake on this version will be a lot faster than that, but I wanted to be very conservative.

    Richard: that certainly would be an interesting process!

    Hep: that’s a real interesting question. Parts of it certainly could be free. We do have a whole new services strategy here and the MSN folks need more advertising inventory to sell.

    But, I think it could be a cool new part of Office. That’s my gut, anyway.

    Like

  11. Oh, and Richard, they could shut me down, but then there’d just be Mini-Microsoft. I think “acquiring” him will be a bit harder! 😉

    Like

  12. Oh, and Richard, they could shut me down, but then there’d just be Mini-Microsoft. I think “acquiring” him will be a bit harder! 😉

    Like

  13. Lecturing your M&A team, isn’t exactly going to go over well. Stick to slamming shaky cameras (with bad audio and poor edits) into run-on droningly boring developers faces.

    Plus, an acquiring public company under SOX must FIRST look at the target’s critical accounting policies; financial due diligence in the age of Sarbanes-Oxley. In addition, the SEC requires disclosure when a public company is considering a merger, hence your blog post could be reasonably detemined to be a ‘consideration’, and thus already be a SEC violation.

    Like

  14. Lecturing your M&A team, isn’t exactly going to go over well. Stick to slamming shaky cameras (with bad audio and poor edits) into run-on droningly boring developers faces.

    Plus, an acquiring public company under SOX must FIRST look at the target’s critical accounting policies; financial due diligence in the age of Sarbanes-Oxley. In addition, the SEC requires disclosure when a public company is considering a merger, hence your blog post could be reasonably detemined to be a ‘consideration’, and thus already be a SEC violation.

    Like

  15. Robert — you state that “NewsGator owns NetNewsWire. It’s the best feed reader on the Mac — by far.” Not trying to be snippy here (I have used NNW on and off since 1.0, and I think it’s a great product, and Brent Simmons is a wonderfully responsive developer), but how many aggregators have you used on OS X? Just to pick a name out of the air, David Watanabe’s NewsFire is a fantastic product, and one that some prefer to NNW.

    Like

  16. Robert — you state that “NewsGator owns NetNewsWire. It’s the best feed reader on the Mac — by far.” Not trying to be snippy here (I have used NNW on and off since 1.0, and I think it’s a great product, and Brent Simmons is a wonderfully responsive developer), but how many aggregators have you used on OS X? Just to pick a name out of the air, David Watanabe’s NewsFire is a fantastic product, and one that some prefer to NNW.

    Like

  17. If you just realize that everything Scoble is hot on, is a perfect short sell. All will be fine.

    Like

  18. Yeah, you buy Newsgator and the NetNewsWire users either stay frozen at version 2.0.1 or switch to Safari RSS or one of the other Mac RSS readers.

    It’s not synchronized with the Mac, at least not publicically. But hell, I can’t even FIND NNW at NewsGator.com. I can find a news story that about the acquisition, but I can’t find a link for all of the other spiffy products you talk about in your post. If I go to NetNewsWire.com I end up at some domain squatters site. If I go to http://www.newsgator.com/netnewswire, guess what I get? A 404. I have to go to Ranchero.com to find NNW. Heck, I can’t even find Feeddemon there. At least it’s at feeddemon.com. What a mess.

    Like

  19. Yeah, you buy Newsgator and the NetNewsWire users either stay frozen at version 2.0.1 or switch to Safari RSS or one of the other Mac RSS readers.

    It’s not synchronized with the Mac, at least not publicically. But hell, I can’t even FIND NNW at NewsGator.com. I can find a news story that about the acquisition, but I can’t find a link for all of the other spiffy products you talk about in your post. If I go to NetNewsWire.com I end up at some domain squatters site. If I go to http://www.newsgator.com/netnewswire, guess what I get? A 404. I have to go to Ranchero.com to find NNW. Heck, I can’t even find Feeddemon there. At least it’s at feeddemon.com. What a mess.

    Like

  20. Scott, yeah, there are definitely things that NewsGator needs to execute better on, which is probably why none of the big three acquired them yet.

    Like

  21. Scott, yeah, there are definitely things that NewsGator needs to execute better on, which is probably why none of the big three acquired them yet.

    Like

  22. That’s the sum total of your rebuttal to question my validlity, to go for the personal attack? Wow, even High School Debate teams could whip you into pudding. But you should consult my resume before you toss out statements like that. As yes I have, a few Fortune 100’s actually. But even min. wage stock clerks at Wally World work for one of the biggest public companies in America. So your “big company” point is moot.

    80% of all mergers fail to kick back any shareholder value, that’s a SEC reported fact. You think you are lucky here? I doubt it. Easy to dupe, nothing really special with Newsgator, they are just a third-party add-on company, that is able to turn the ship faster than MFST.

    But a quick history lesson…

    MSNBC – ouch, that ending price tag gotta hurt.

    AOL – failed after a year of talks.

    Great Plains and Navision – Oucccch (eventually maybe something, not now tho). How to Kill Big Players by Mergers 101.

    FolderShare – wheeee (pointless).

    Groove Networks – Where is that again? Stuck somewhere in Office 12?

    Rare – expensive Xbox battle gameplan.

    Slate/UPC/Corel – umm never mind, it be for sale.

    Titus and Peach – Digital TV ratholes. Ouch. Expensive.

    Front-Bridge, ContentGuard, Vermeer, Jump Networks, Softway, One Tree, RenderMorphics, Fox Software Inc., Connectix – Good pieces of an exventual puzzle yet with heavy abandonware risks, expensive tho.

    Like

  23. That’s the sum total of your rebuttal to question my validlity, to go for the personal attack? Wow, even High School Debate teams could whip you into pudding. But you should consult my resume before you toss out statements like that. As yes I have, a few Fortune 100’s actually. But even min. wage stock clerks at Wally World work for one of the biggest public companies in America. So your “big company” point is moot.

    80% of all mergers fail to kick back any shareholder value, that’s a SEC reported fact. You think you are lucky here? I doubt it. Easy to dupe, nothing really special with Newsgator, they are just a third-party add-on company, that is able to turn the ship faster than MFST.

    But a quick history lesson…

    MSNBC – ouch, that ending price tag gotta hurt.

    AOL – failed after a year of talks.

    Great Plains and Navision – Oucccch (eventually maybe something, not now tho). How to Kill Big Players by Mergers 101.

    FolderShare – wheeee (pointless).

    Groove Networks – Where is that again? Stuck somewhere in Office 12?

    Rare – expensive Xbox battle gameplan.

    Slate/UPC/Corel – umm never mind, it be for sale.

    Titus and Peach – Digital TV ratholes. Ouch. Expensive.

    Front-Bridge, ContentGuard, Vermeer, Jump Networks, Softway, One Tree, RenderMorphics, Fox Software Inc., Connectix – Good pieces of an exventual puzzle yet with heavy abandonware risks, expensive tho.

    Like

  24. Scoble: I don’t know if Christopher has worked at a big company, but he is right about Sarbanes-Oxley things being a pain in the neck. I’m glad I don’t have to (directly) deal with it. Most major companies have a team ensuring that all SOX policies are adhered to (from what I understand), so that should be a testament to how crazy it is.

    Also, I wasn’t suggesting they acquire Scobleizer to shut you up. They would just rebuild you from the ground up and not include the second-guess-executives DNA strand. 😉

    Like

  25. Scoble: I don’t know if Christopher has worked at a big company, but he is right about Sarbanes-Oxley things being a pain in the neck. I’m glad I don’t have to (directly) deal with it. Most major companies have a team ensuring that all SOX policies are adhered to (from what I understand), so that should be a testament to how crazy it is.

    Also, I wasn’t suggesting they acquire Scobleizer to shut you up. They would just rebuild you from the ground up and not include the second-guess-executives DNA strand. 😉

    Like

  26. Good for you Christopher – doesn’t it just suck like a Seville orange when history suddenly pops up and smacks folk in the intellectual gut?

    But seriously, you’ve got a point here. There’s Robert defending some numbers no-one else has divulged in filings I’ve seen. Of course he can always say: “I’m just a tinsy winsy blogger, I’m blowing smoke out my ass to see what others think. I’m no exec. I’ve no inside track…” Maybe true in part – but by any standards, Robert has a Titanic sized megaphone.

    I don’t see too many SEC type people being too impressed. Or those accountable to shareholders who might just think that being ‘conservative’ or not is hardly a great way to be part of Microsoft’s marketing efforts.

    Many inside and outside of MSFT might find it amusing, but not many of those who bet their savings on holding MSFT stock.

    Like

  27. Good for you Christopher – doesn’t it just suck like a Seville orange when history suddenly pops up and smacks folk in the intellectual gut?

    But seriously, you’ve got a point here. There’s Robert defending some numbers no-one else has divulged in filings I’ve seen. Of course he can always say: “I’m just a tinsy winsy blogger, I’m blowing smoke out my ass to see what others think. I’m no exec. I’ve no inside track…” Maybe true in part – but by any standards, Robert has a Titanic sized megaphone.

    I don’t see too many SEC type people being too impressed. Or those accountable to shareholders who might just think that being ‘conservative’ or not is hardly a great way to be part of Microsoft’s marketing efforts.

    Many inside and outside of MSFT might find it amusing, but not many of those who bet their savings on holding MSFT stock.

    Like

  28. Microsoft dosn’t buy. It watches and replicates fast.
    Google throws lots of stuff at the wall and sees if somethings sticks.
    Yahoo looks at others throwing mud on the wall and collects mud thats about to stick.

    Sorry Scoble, you would have been at better mud collection if you were at yahoo.

    Like

  29. Microsoft dosn’t buy. It watches and replicates fast.
    Google throws lots of stuff at the wall and sees if somethings sticks.
    Yahoo looks at others throwing mud on the wall and collects mud thats about to stick.

    Sorry Scoble, you would have been at better mud collection if you were at yahoo.

    Like

  30. I do understand that you kind of have to talk yourself into a piece of deadend technology like NewsGator and I can even imagine that you actually use NewsGator by yourself or think of it as something worthy.

    But face it: the real world doesn’t like it and much worse: doesn need it as well! “But hey…” you say, “..they don’t like Outlook as well (and same still use it) – so what’s your point?”

    My point is that only buisness freaks use Outlook because it was pushed on them, and those poor guys just happen do not know something better. And of course Microsoft chicks use it, part of them for the same reason. Not so slowly this changes.

    If Microsoft isn’t smart enough to recognize that the world around them has changed abit, they’re a doomed.

    The Future says: Online Aggregators, read: #1 Bloglines, #2 Google Reader, #3 Rojo…

    NewsGator Online better than Bloglines? Hahaha! Not even a bad clone yet.

    Like

  31. I do understand that you kind of have to talk yourself into a piece of deadend technology like NewsGator and I can even imagine that you actually use NewsGator by yourself or think of it as something worthy.

    But face it: the real world doesn’t like it and much worse: doesn need it as well! “But hey…” you say, “..they don’t like Outlook as well (and same still use it) – so what’s your point?”

    My point is that only buisness freaks use Outlook because it was pushed on them, and those poor guys just happen do not know something better. And of course Microsoft chicks use it, part of them for the same reason. Not so slowly this changes.

    If Microsoft isn’t smart enough to recognize that the world around them has changed abit, they’re a doomed.

    The Future says: Online Aggregators, read: #1 Bloglines, #2 Google Reader, #3 Rojo…

    NewsGator Online better than Bloglines? Hahaha! Not even a bad clone yet.

    Like

  32. Christopher – As someone who came to Microsoft through the RenderMorphics acquisition, I’d disagree with the “expensive” part 😉 The technology we produced was delivered by the team itself, and was massively successfull over time (and still is). Just look at Direct3D.

    Also, here’s another couple for your list:

    BAO begat Flight Simulator, which I believe is the longest running Microsoft product ever.

    Bungie: Halo/Halo 2. Anybody heard of those. Fairly successfull I think.

    Like

  33. Christopher – As someone who came to Microsoft through the RenderMorphics acquisition, I’d disagree with the “expensive” part 😉 The technology we produced was delivered by the team itself, and was massively successfull over time (and still is). Just look at Direct3D.

    Also, here’s another couple for your list:

    BAO begat Flight Simulator, which I believe is the longest running Microsoft product ever.

    Bungie: Halo/Halo 2. Anybody heard of those. Fairly successfull I think.

    Like

  34. Folks are missing one fact “Google Reader PM Jason Shellen and engineer Chris Wetherell both confirmed Google’s plans””

    I think, what scobes is pointing out is simple, they (googs) is getting ahead of the game and he suggests a method of short-circuting the corporate brain in a transprarent manner via a blog post.

    Chris C: you call upon the statutes of the soxs line as a rebuttal offering, may I ask the instruments and section that you are refering to in particular ??

    Like

  35. Folks are missing one fact “Google Reader PM Jason Shellen and engineer Chris Wetherell both confirmed Google’s plans””

    I think, what scobes is pointing out is simple, they (googs) is getting ahead of the game and he suggests a method of short-circuting the corporate brain in a transprarent manner via a blog post.

    Chris C: you call upon the statutes of the soxs line as a rebuttal offering, may I ask the instruments and section that you are refering to in particular ??

    Like

  36. Buying Newsgater might even buy some excitement around Office 12. But if it’s considered a threat in any manner, no way in hell it will happen. Any product that entices its users to spend more time on the web rather than working within an office product is never going to be a hit at Microsoft. What happens if Office users *gasp* start feeling comfortable using a web based reader? Doesn’t this lead them right into Writely? 🙂

    Would be a great MS purchase but I don’t see it happening. Office has too much clout to block it.

    Like

  37. Buying Newsgater might even buy some excitement around Office 12. But if it’s considered a threat in any manner, no way in hell it will happen. Any product that entices its users to spend more time on the web rather than working within an office product is never going to be a hit at Microsoft. What happens if Office users *gasp* start feeling comfortable using a web based reader? Doesn’t this lead them right into Writely? 🙂

    Would be a great MS purchase but I don’t see it happening. Office has too much clout to block it.

    Like

  38. Yeah, ok, Bungie and BAO…good points (my bad for leaving off list, wasn’t meant comprehensive), though Bungie wrapped in the total overall Xbox budget per se, so a loss even if a hit. FolderShare, however impressive a developer kick (even that’s up for debate), still won’t impact shareholders.

    MFST’s M&A are a mixed bag, horrid in content and Cable TV. Crumbling for things they can’t work into a strategic advantage, (Solomon, Great Plains, Navision). But good in things that can mix into the whole, ie. Vermeer becoming MS FrontPage.

    easier to rebuild something that’s already done

    You’d think, but actually sometimes it’s easier to start from zero, than to rework outside code in. All varies tho, case by case.

    But Ian McAllister with his hints per “some senior players at another Tier 1 Internet company” and Scoble, with more the lucid dreaming wishlists, man, I wonder when SOX is gonna bite the bloggers. But in and ironic way, they really need not worry, the general market doesn’t care, blogging is overhyped in its importance. And the blogger rumor mills have less than a coin flip in terms of accuracy levels.

    Like

  39. Yeah, ok, Bungie and BAO…good points (my bad for leaving off list, wasn’t meant comprehensive), though Bungie wrapped in the total overall Xbox budget per se, so a loss even if a hit. FolderShare, however impressive a developer kick (even that’s up for debate), still won’t impact shareholders.

    MFST’s M&A are a mixed bag, horrid in content and Cable TV. Crumbling for things they can’t work into a strategic advantage, (Solomon, Great Plains, Navision). But good in things that can mix into the whole, ie. Vermeer becoming MS FrontPage.

    easier to rebuild something that’s already done

    You’d think, but actually sometimes it’s easier to start from zero, than to rework outside code in. All varies tho, case by case.

    But Ian McAllister with his hints per “some senior players at another Tier 1 Internet company” and Scoble, with more the lucid dreaming wishlists, man, I wonder when SOX is gonna bite the bloggers. But in and ironic way, they really need not worry, the general market doesn’t care, blogging is overhyped in its importance. And the blogger rumor mills have less than a coin flip in terms of accuracy levels.

    Like

  40. Am I missing something here… Isn’t the web the platform? Why would anyone need a RSS Platform?

    Who cares how many aggregators Newsgator owns. Let’s get serious …how hard is it to build an aggregator? How hard is it to reformat RSS to read in Outlook? For a company with the resources of Microsoft, I would think not too hard.

    What exactly are you buying by buying Newsgator? It’s not going to solve the big company disease that Microsoft is infected with. It’s still very very early in the RSS game. Remember Lycos, Excite and Infoseek. They all got bought!

    Just launch Vista already…. If it does RSS, it will have more distribution than all the platforms and aggregators combined in what the first week?

    And Newsgator… for god’s sake change your freakin’ name….. Why would anyone have Gator in their name? Even Gator changed their name! 😉

    Like

  41. Am I missing something here… Isn’t the web the platform? Why would anyone need a RSS Platform?

    Who cares how many aggregators Newsgator owns. Let’s get serious …how hard is it to build an aggregator? How hard is it to reformat RSS to read in Outlook? For a company with the resources of Microsoft, I would think not too hard.

    What exactly are you buying by buying Newsgator? It’s not going to solve the big company disease that Microsoft is infected with. It’s still very very early in the RSS game. Remember Lycos, Excite and Infoseek. They all got bought!

    Just launch Vista already…. If it does RSS, it will have more distribution than all the platforms and aggregators combined in what the first week?

    And Newsgator… for god’s sake change your freakin’ name….. Why would anyone have Gator in their name? Even Gator changed their name! 😉

    Like

  42. I don’t really like any of the readers I’ve tried. Matter of fact, not a one offers the feature I want most — and remember seeing in the first reader I tried years ago: Chronological view of all feeds. If I have 100 feeds, I want to see every story in a single pane in the order it is time-stamped. That way I can quickly glance at the latest stories, regardless of source. I don’t see that feature anywhere. Anyone have a client that does this (PC side of the house)?

    Until there is a compelling reason to use an alternate program/service, I stick with Sage.

    Like

  43. I don’t really like any of the readers I’ve tried. Matter of fact, not a one offers the feature I want most — and remember seeing in the first reader I tried years ago: Chronological view of all feeds. If I have 100 feeds, I want to see every story in a single pane in the order it is time-stamped. That way I can quickly glance at the latest stories, regardless of source. I don’t see that feature anywhere. Anyone have a client that does this (PC side of the house)?

    Until there is a compelling reason to use an alternate program/service, I stick with Sage.

    Like

  44. Kirk95: when you ask “how hard is it to make an aggregator?” you sound a lot like a NIH person. It’s very hard to do it well. Which is why you’re seeing so much angst in the comments here.

    Like

  45. Kirk95: when you ask “how hard is it to make an aggregator?” you sound a lot like a NIH person. It’s very hard to do it well. Which is why you’re seeing so much angst in the comments here.

    Like

  46. Robert,

    Why you talk about this in public? Use your 2 hours response time in communications with Steve Ballmer and make this happen.
    Too many talking without results is not good. Even more – some people already noticed that MSFT shareholders can sue you – as it can look like you are trying to play a game with stocks. You have real motivation to play this game – as you probably have some options.
    Show us results please!

    Like

  47. Robert,

    Why you talk about this in public? Use your 2 hours response time in communications with Steve Ballmer and make this happen.
    Too many talking without results is not good. Even more – some people already noticed that MSFT shareholders can sue you – as it can look like you are trying to play a game with stocks. You have real motivation to play this game – as you probably have some options.
    Show us results please!

    Like

  48. “Cause it searches YOUR feeds” ???
    I wish this was true. Newsgator definately does not search my feeds. I asked for this feature a long time ago, and just recently they told me it will be coming soon.

    Like

  49. “Cause it searches YOUR feeds” ???
    I wish this was true. Newsgator definately does not search my feeds. I asked for this feature a long time ago, and just recently they told me it will be coming soon.

    Like

  50. Christopher: Microsoft didn’t buy Groove to get Groove. They bought Groove to get Ray Ozzie. That’s where they expect return of investment.

    Like

  51. Christopher: Microsoft didn’t buy Groove to get Groove. They bought Groove to get Ray Ozzie. That’s where they expect return of investment.

    Like

  52. One more missed above: Visio

    I was in the process of recommending it to a government agency with about 45,000 seats. Had a trial version and was scanning and drawing our network topology with it. Had signed non-disclosure on several upcoming features that would run circles around anything out there (to this day). I was working FOR the agency, not as a middleman sales-rep, so all I had to do was turn in my report and money would flow.

    All of a sudden the Visio people didn’t return phone calls so I ditched the report. Next thing I know its an add-on to Office, minus the more useful features, and the stuff in the pipeline never saw the light of day.

    This is what I hate about Microsoft. They not only crush competition, they crush innovation even if it isn’t competition. They are a bull in the china shop of US technology, which is why I think they have set us back at least ten years in many areas. That’s why I think that the only hope for technology to break free is for the US to become a second class citizen, a fate well on its way to happening.

    Congratulations Microsoft, and congratulations to Scoble for participating (probably unknowingly) in the cover-up.

    Like

  53. One more missed above: Visio

    I was in the process of recommending it to a government agency with about 45,000 seats. Had a trial version and was scanning and drawing our network topology with it. Had signed non-disclosure on several upcoming features that would run circles around anything out there (to this day). I was working FOR the agency, not as a middleman sales-rep, so all I had to do was turn in my report and money would flow.

    All of a sudden the Visio people didn’t return phone calls so I ditched the report. Next thing I know its an add-on to Office, minus the more useful features, and the stuff in the pipeline never saw the light of day.

    This is what I hate about Microsoft. They not only crush competition, they crush innovation even if it isn’t competition. They are a bull in the china shop of US technology, which is why I think they have set us back at least ten years in many areas. That’s why I think that the only hope for technology to break free is for the US to become a second class citizen, a fate well on its way to happening.

    Congratulations Microsoft, and congratulations to Scoble for participating (probably unknowingly) in the cover-up.

    Like

  54. macbeach: I’m not trying to cover anything up here. If you search on Visio you’ll find a few ex-employees who’ve given their side of the story.

    It’s the downside of acquisitions. They rarely go well unless there’s a real strategic reason to do them and unless the teams doing the acquisition really understand what they are buying and want to work with (and for) the new team.

    Like

  55. macbeach: I’m not trying to cover anything up here. If you search on Visio you’ll find a few ex-employees who’ve given their side of the story.

    It’s the downside of acquisitions. They rarely go well unless there’s a real strategic reason to do them and unless the teams doing the acquisition really understand what they are buying and want to work with (and for) the new team.

    Like

  56. NewsGator rocks! I still like Google Reader’s keyboard shortcuts, though. Except that they’ve ignored my suggestion for page-up and page-down keys–I would think that F and B would work since their other keystrokes are very vi-like. Perhaps when MS acquires NewsGator, you can have them incorporate some good keyboard shortcuts.

    Like

  57. NewsGator rocks! I still like Google Reader’s keyboard shortcuts, though. Except that they’ve ignored my suggestion for page-up and page-down keys–I would think that F and B would work since their other keystrokes are very vi-like. Perhaps when MS acquires NewsGator, you can have them incorporate some good keyboard shortcuts.

    Like

  58. Is Microsoft too stupid to code a RSS API by themself? It’s a piece of cake to code something like that. By the way, RSS is old, Atom is more the way to go. As always, Microsoft is too late …

    Why does Microsoft drop core things in Vista (like WinFS) but puts useless things (like an RSS api, eye candy, ..) in? Right .. to win users and to fight back against what they think is their worst enemy, Google and OSS.

    Trust me, within 10 years Windows is doomed. People just use Windows because they’re used to it, not because it’s a good OS. Just look at all security holes it has … Do we pay for that?!

    Like

  59. Is Microsoft too stupid to code a RSS API by themself? It’s a piece of cake to code something like that. By the way, RSS is old, Atom is more the way to go. As always, Microsoft is too late …

    Why does Microsoft drop core things in Vista (like WinFS) but puts useless things (like an RSS api, eye candy, ..) in? Right .. to win users and to fight back against what they think is their worst enemy, Google and OSS.

    Trust me, within 10 years Windows is doomed. People just use Windows because they’re used to it, not because it’s a good OS. Just look at all security holes it has … Do we pay for that?!

    Like

  60. “you have this assumption that MS has to compete on everything. why?”

    Because Microsoft is a convicted monopolist felon and this culture permeates Microsoft from the executive boardroom to the janitorial closet.

    Like

  61. “you have this assumption that MS has to compete on everything. why?”

    Because Microsoft is a convicted monopolist felon and this culture permeates Microsoft from the executive boardroom to the janitorial closet.

    Like

  62. When I ask how hard is it to write an aggregator, I meant for Microsoft? For me it would be impossible….

    You don’t think Microsoft could write a RSS aggregator in a matter of weeks or months? You guys have MSN, Windows, Office, Servers and .NET… just connect the dots with RSS? I don’t see how hard that is? Sorry? What happened to Team RSS and the orange shoes?

    Why couldn’t Outlook, or IE, or Word, or Excel, or PowerPoint or Microsoft Live or Office Live or all of the above be Microsoft’s aggregator?

    Why couldn’t your server apps be the aggregator. I just don’t get what a Newsgator or Attensa would add to Microsoft? Enterprise RSS? Syncing Posts. Is that a feature, product or company…? Wait a minute Brad’s invested in Newsgator…must be a company. 🙂

    So what’s an NIH person? I don’t like the sound of that – yikes… 😉

    Hey I feel your frustration, I’ve worked in huge companies before…

    Microsoft historically has been the quintessential slow follower. First mover advantage is just not as important when you have billions in cash on the balance sheet and 90% plus share in OS and Office markets. Remember Apple, Remember Borland, Remember Netscape, Remember Google (oops to early on that on one, maybe next year)

    Happy New year!

    Like

  63. When I ask how hard is it to write an aggregator, I meant for Microsoft? For me it would be impossible….

    You don’t think Microsoft could write a RSS aggregator in a matter of weeks or months? You guys have MSN, Windows, Office, Servers and .NET… just connect the dots with RSS? I don’t see how hard that is? Sorry? What happened to Team RSS and the orange shoes?

    Why couldn’t Outlook, or IE, or Word, or Excel, or PowerPoint or Microsoft Live or Office Live or all of the above be Microsoft’s aggregator?

    Why couldn’t your server apps be the aggregator. I just don’t get what a Newsgator or Attensa would add to Microsoft? Enterprise RSS? Syncing Posts. Is that a feature, product or company…? Wait a minute Brad’s invested in Newsgator…must be a company. 🙂

    So what’s an NIH person? I don’t like the sound of that – yikes… 😉

    Hey I feel your frustration, I’ve worked in huge companies before…

    Microsoft historically has been the quintessential slow follower. First mover advantage is just not as important when you have billions in cash on the balance sheet and 90% plus share in OS and Office markets. Remember Apple, Remember Borland, Remember Netscape, Remember Google (oops to early on that on one, maybe next year)

    Happy New year!

    Like

  64. Pingback: Conversion Rater

Comments are closed.