RSS usability sucks

At the Blog Business Summit yesterday we discovered just how bad RSS usability sucks. Molly Holzschalg was on stage with me and visited a blog and was trying to find its RSS feed. She couldn’t find it. Why? Cause there’s no consistency in this industry on how to subscribe.

Some sites use RSS icons. Most that I visit use the orange XML icon. But other sites don’t have any icon and instead use words like “subscribe” or “feed” or “web feed.”

Even others, like many Blogger sites, don’t have any icon or word with a link at all. For those you’ve gotta know to simply add “atom.xml” onto the end of the URL. Aaaaarrrrrrgggggghhhhhhh.

And then there’s sites like Dare Obasanjo’s. He’s a geek. Works at MSN. But look at the right side of his blog. He has four DIFFERENT icons for RSS. One for Yahoo. One for MSN. One for Bloglines. One for Newsgator.

Oh, I bet Jakob Nielsen is screaming right about now.

Whenever I hit problems like this I ask myself “what would Jeffrey Zeldman do?” Or WWJZD for short. πŸ™‚

Why Jeffrey? He’s still leading the Web design movement forward and is my favorite writer and speaker on the topic.

I find his minimalistic answer unsatisfying. He puts a text link in very small type at the bottom of his page.

My advice? Stick with the orange XML icon. Why? It sticks out. If the page Molly was trying to deal with yesterday had one of those she would have found it instantly. The BBC’s answer is actually pretty good too. They went with an Orange RSS button and next to it have a link to “What is RSS.”

In fact, I think that’s really the best answer: “just do what the BBC does.”

Advertisements

86 thoughts on “RSS usability sucks

  1. Scoble, Zeldman has a text link in his sidebar. The text link at the bottom of the page is for validating his RSS, CSS, etc. When one clicks on “RSS Feeds” Zeldman gives a short page explaining what it is and how to use it.

    Like

  2. Scoble, Zeldman has a text link in his sidebar. The text link at the bottom of the page is for validating his RSS, CSS, etc. When one clicks on “RSS Feeds” Zeldman gives a short page explaining what it is and how to use it.

    Like

  3. Scoble, Zeldman has a text link in his sidebar. The text link at the bottom of the page is for validating his RSS, CSS, etc. When one clicks on “RSS Feeds” Zeldman gives a short page explaining what it is and how to use it.

    Like

  4. Apple’s Safari automatically detects if there is RSS links on your page and posts an RSS icon in the url bar.

    Doesn’t this seem like the logical place for RSS annoucement?!?! Even with a friendly orange icon on the webpage, you still have to search for it.

    Plus, the web browser is already decoding every line of html, etc. So, why not just have the browser detect it?!?!

    I imagine that a problem exists when multiple RSS feed links appear on the same page; however, I doubt this is very common — it hasn’t been for me, in fact, I have never had a problem and a subscribe to way-too-many blog feeds.

    Like

  5. Apple’s Safari automatically detects if there is RSS links on your page and posts an RSS icon in the url bar.

    Doesn’t this seem like the logical place for RSS annoucement?!?! Even with a friendly orange icon on the webpage, you still have to search for it.

    Plus, the web browser is already decoding every line of html, etc. So, why not just have the browser detect it?!?!

    I imagine that a problem exists when multiple RSS feed links appear on the same page; however, I doubt this is very common — it hasn’t been for me, in fact, I have never had a problem and a subscribe to way-too-many blog feeds.

    Like

  6. Apple’s Safari automatically detects if there is RSS links on your page and posts an RSS icon in the url bar.

    Doesn’t this seem like the logical place for RSS annoucement?!?! Even with a friendly orange icon on the webpage, you still have to search for it.

    Plus, the web browser is already decoding every line of html, etc. So, why not just have the browser detect it?!?!

    I imagine that a problem exists when multiple RSS feed links appear on the same page; however, I doubt this is very common — it hasn’t been for me, in fact, I have never had a problem and a subscribe to way-too-many blog feeds.

    Like

  7. This is already a solved problem. Within the next year or so, every modern web browser will have feed autodiscovery and this will be a moot discussion.

    At best you’re suggesting stopgap solutions which will likely be irrelvant when IE 7 ships.

    Like

  8. This is already a solved problem. Within the next year or so, every modern web browser will have feed autodiscovery and this will be a moot discussion.

    At best you’re suggesting stopgap solutions which will likely be irrelvant when IE 7 ships.

    Like

  9. This is already a solved problem. Within the next year or so, every modern web browser will have feed autodiscovery and this will be a moot discussion.

    At best you’re suggesting stopgap solutions which will likely be irrelvant when IE 7 ships.

    Like

  10. Most RSS readers will locate the feed if you just provide them with the blog’s URL. (at least if the blog system is clever enough to provide an “alternate” link tag with the “type” attribute set to “application/rss+xml”)

    The icon style isn’t really a problem, but there is another problem related to the feed. Maybe hard to believe, but not every visitor knows what RSS is. If such a user clicks the feed link, he will get the raw XML in his face. Not exactly user friendly. The feed should have a corresponding XML stylesheet providing a user-friendly page when the visitor clicks the feed link. It works with any decent browser and could display a brief tutorial on RSS and feed readers. Some blog systems provides this automagically, so does some third-party tools like Feedburner.

    Like

  11. Most RSS readers will locate the feed if you just provide them with the blog’s URL. (at least if the blog system is clever enough to provide an “alternate” link tag with the “type” attribute set to “application/rss+xml”)

    The icon style isn’t really a problem, but there is another problem related to the feed. Maybe hard to believe, but not every visitor knows what RSS is. If such a user clicks the feed link, he will get the raw XML in his face. Not exactly user friendly. The feed should have a corresponding XML stylesheet providing a user-friendly page when the visitor clicks the feed link. It works with any decent browser and could display a brief tutorial on RSS and feed readers. Some blog systems provides this automagically, so does some third-party tools like Feedburner.

    Like

  12. Most RSS readers will locate the feed if you just provide them with the blog’s URL. (at least if the blog system is clever enough to provide an “alternate” link tag with the “type” attribute set to “application/rss+xml”)

    The icon style isn’t really a problem, but there is another problem related to the feed. Maybe hard to believe, but not every visitor knows what RSS is. If such a user clicks the feed link, he will get the raw XML in his face. Not exactly user friendly. The feed should have a corresponding XML stylesheet providing a user-friendly page when the visitor clicks the feed link. It works with any decent browser and could display a brief tutorial on RSS and feed readers. Some blog systems provides this automagically, so does some third-party tools like Feedburner.

    Like

  13. Safari sniffs out the rss on the home page and displays it in blue rectangle on the address line at the far right. Then just clicking on that blue rss rectangle the rss is automatically placed in the default rss reader in this case for me its called Newsfire. Then a simple return adds that feed to my reader. Just that simple. Click and return. Done!

    Like

  14. Safari sniffs out the rss on the home page and displays it in blue rectangle on the address line at the far right. Then just clicking on that blue rss rectangle the rss is automatically placed in the default rss reader in this case for me its called Newsfire. Then a simple return adds that feed to my reader. Just that simple. Click and return. Done!

    Like

  15. Safari sniffs out the rss on the home page and displays it in blue rectangle on the address line at the far right. Then just clicking on that blue rss rectangle the rss is automatically placed in the default rss reader in this case for me its called Newsfire. Then a simple return adds that feed to my reader. Just that simple. Click and return. Done!

    Like

  16. If you are using an aggregator, you can almost certainly just ask it to subscribe to the main blog page – in which case it will do an auto-discovery and either subscribe or offer choices.

    Like

  17. If you are using an aggregator, you can almost certainly just ask it to subscribe to the main blog page – in which case it will do an auto-discovery and either subscribe or offer choices.

    Like

  18. If you are using an aggregator, you can almost certainly just ask it to subscribe to the main blog page – in which case it will do an auto-discovery and either subscribe or offer choices.

    Like

  19. I have all the logos on my blog. Why? Because the vast majority of those that use RSS don’t event know it. I use the generic XML logo for the RSS feed plus the ‘My MSN’ and ‘MY Yahoo’ icons for the vast majority of RSS subscribers that see the syndicated world as a ‘my’ application.

    This is a problem though and NOT solved as some suggest: saying IE7 will fix it is not the solution.

    Like

  20. I have all the logos on my blog. Why? Because the vast majority of those that use RSS don’t event know it. I use the generic XML logo for the RSS feed plus the ‘My MSN’ and ‘MY Yahoo’ icons for the vast majority of RSS subscribers that see the syndicated world as a ‘my’ application.

    This is a problem though and NOT solved as some suggest: saying IE7 will fix it is not the solution.

    Like

  21. I have all the logos on my blog. Why? Because the vast majority of those that use RSS don’t event know it. I use the generic XML logo for the RSS feed plus the ‘My MSN’ and ‘MY Yahoo’ icons for the vast majority of RSS subscribers that see the syndicated world as a ‘my’ application.

    This is a problem though and NOT solved as some suggest: saying IE7 will fix it is not the solution.

    Like

  22. Safari has the best solution yet with the auto-detection. Nice to see IE7 picking up on that. And by picking up, I mean copying the interface completely. Firefox and Opera should follow suit. It really is quite intuitive.

    Like

  23. Safari has the best solution yet with the auto-detection. Nice to see IE7 picking up on that. And by picking up, I mean copying the interface completely. Firefox and Opera should follow suit. It really is quite intuitive.

    Like

  24. Safari has the best solution yet with the auto-detection. Nice to see IE7 picking up on that. And by picking up, I mean copying the interface completely. Firefox and Opera should follow suit. It really is quite intuitive.

    Like

  25. The orange XML icon is outmoded and makes no sense. I’ve debated this with Dave W. over e-mail and he’s just plain wrong on this one.

    The orange XML icon doesn’t work for the following reasons:

    1. Users shouldn’t need to know what XML is- many of them will never understand that.
    2. The icon won’t make sense in many locales (don’t cite the Chinese People’s Daily- very lame example).
    3. Since the orange XML icon doesn’t actually help the user subscribe, it is at best an incomplete solution.

    I like Dare’s solution for having each “one-click” subscription option on his page. We need to have one-click subscriptions working consistently and a better way than the orange icon to identify where to click. If we do that, then we’ll have something useful.

    Like

  26. The orange XML icon is outmoded and makes no sense. I’ve debated this with Dave W. over e-mail and he’s just plain wrong on this one.

    The orange XML icon doesn’t work for the following reasons:

    1. Users shouldn’t need to know what XML is- many of them will never understand that.
    2. The icon won’t make sense in many locales (don’t cite the Chinese People’s Daily- very lame example).
    3. Since the orange XML icon doesn’t actually help the user subscribe, it is at best an incomplete solution.

    I like Dare’s solution for having each “one-click” subscription option on his page. We need to have one-click subscriptions working consistently and a better way than the orange icon to identify where to click. If we do that, then we’ll have something useful.

    Like

  27. The orange XML icon is outmoded and makes no sense. I’ve debated this with Dave W. over e-mail and he’s just plain wrong on this one.

    The orange XML icon doesn’t work for the following reasons:

    1. Users shouldn’t need to know what XML is- many of them will never understand that.
    2. The icon won’t make sense in many locales (don’t cite the Chinese People’s Daily- very lame example).
    3. Since the orange XML icon doesn’t actually help the user subscribe, it is at best an incomplete solution.

    I like Dare’s solution for having each “one-click” subscription option on his page. We need to have one-click subscriptions working consistently and a better way than the orange icon to identify where to click. If we do that, then we’ll have something useful.

    Like

  28. I think the underlying point is getting lost here and we’re nitpicking about feed icons again (how many times have we had this discussion?). The point of this post is that RSS usability sucks. It’s not just feed discovery, which as Dare points out is going to become, if it’s not already, a moot point (although I’m curious to see how the autodiscovery things deal with multiple RSS links on a page, javascript links, and other idiosyncrasies). What about trackbacks, viewing/posting comments from an aggregator, unified identity, blogs with only partial content in the description tag (*cough* SCOBLE *cough*), spam, archive naviagation, searching. We can rave about our various browsers autodiscovery, or our aggregators cool features, or our nifty orange feed icons until the cows come home. But on the whole, RSS usability *still sucks*! So what are we gonna do about it? Wait for Microsoft to proprietize it? Cause that’s why big companies proprietize things, because the community agreed upon standards suck (and if the standard itself doesn’t suck, then the documentation does).
    Don’t get me wrong, I like RSS/ATOM/syndycation/community standards, I’m just making a point.
    -Paul

    Like

  29. I think the underlying point is getting lost here and we’re nitpicking about feed icons again (how many times have we had this discussion?). The point of this post is that RSS usability sucks. It’s not just feed discovery, which as Dare points out is going to become, if it’s not already, a moot point (although I’m curious to see how the autodiscovery things deal with multiple RSS links on a page, javascript links, and other idiosyncrasies). What about trackbacks, viewing/posting comments from an aggregator, unified identity, blogs with only partial content in the description tag (*cough* SCOBLE *cough*), spam, archive naviagation, searching. We can rave about our various browsers autodiscovery, or our aggregators cool features, or our nifty orange feed icons until the cows come home. But on the whole, RSS usability *still sucks*! So what are we gonna do about it? Wait for Microsoft to proprietize it? Cause that’s why big companies proprietize things, because the community agreed upon standards suck (and if the standard itself doesn’t suck, then the documentation does).
    Don’t get me wrong, I like RSS/ATOM/syndycation/community standards, I’m just making a point.
    -Paul

    Like

  30. I think the underlying point is getting lost here and we’re nitpicking about feed icons again (how many times have we had this discussion?). The point of this post is that RSS usability sucks. It’s not just feed discovery, which as Dare points out is going to become, if it’s not already, a moot point (although I’m curious to see how the autodiscovery things deal with multiple RSS links on a page, javascript links, and other idiosyncrasies). What about trackbacks, viewing/posting comments from an aggregator, unified identity, blogs with only partial content in the description tag (*cough* SCOBLE *cough*), spam, archive naviagation, searching. We can rave about our various browsers autodiscovery, or our aggregators cool features, or our nifty orange feed icons until the cows come home. But on the whole, RSS usability *still sucks*! So what are we gonna do about it? Wait for Microsoft to proprietize it? Cause that’s why big companies proprietize things, because the community agreed upon standards suck (and if the standard itself doesn’t suck, then the documentation does).
    Don’t get me wrong, I like RSS/ATOM/syndycation/community standards, I’m just making a point.
    -Paul

    Like

  31. This is kind of confusing, considering your opinion on the IE rss icon proposals a few weeks ago…

    I definitely agree though, RSS could use a usability boost, but I don’t think that icons, in whatever shape or form are going to solve it.

    The way I see it, it takes quite a bit for people to see the benefits of rss. Rss aggregators are too fragmented at this point. I wonder what it will take to make rss apple simple. Maybe some ‘love’ from MS.

    Like

  32. This is kind of confusing, considering your opinion on the IE rss icon proposals a few weeks ago…

    I definitely agree though, RSS could use a usability boost, but I don’t think that icons, in whatever shape or form are going to solve it.

    The way I see it, it takes quite a bit for people to see the benefits of rss. Rss aggregators are too fragmented at this point. I wonder what it will take to make rss apple simple. Maybe some ‘love’ from MS.

    Like

  33. This is kind of confusing, considering your opinion on the IE rss icon proposals a few weeks ago…

    I definitely agree though, RSS could use a usability boost, but I don’t think that icons, in whatever shape or form are going to solve it.

    The way I see it, it takes quite a bit for people to see the benefits of rss. Rss aggregators are too fragmented at this point. I wonder what it will take to make rss apple simple. Maybe some ‘love’ from MS.

    Like

  34. I disagree with the use of the orange XML button. I think letters XML should be replaced with a more general “Subscribe”. That button should take you to page with all of the sites subscriptions options(email, rss), as well as XML buttons with a description of RSS/XML feeds and a suggested preferred method to read them(google reader or bloglines, on my site). If you want, offer a simple link on the front page, right next to the Subscribe button that links powerusers automatically to the XML link.

    The only problem with this method is that it takes a lot of effort that most web projects aren’t likely to be willing to go through.

    Like

  35. I disagree with the use of the orange XML button. I think letters XML should be replaced with a more general “Subscribe”. That button should take you to page with all of the sites subscriptions options(email, rss), as well as XML buttons with a description of RSS/XML feeds and a suggested preferred method to read them(google reader or bloglines, on my site). If you want, offer a simple link on the front page, right next to the Subscribe button that links powerusers automatically to the XML link.

    The only problem with this method is that it takes a lot of effort that most web projects aren’t likely to be willing to go through.

    Like

  36. I disagree with the use of the orange XML button. I think letters XML should be replaced with a more general “Subscribe”. That button should take you to page with all of the sites subscriptions options(email, rss), as well as XML buttons with a description of RSS/XML feeds and a suggested preferred method to read them(google reader or bloglines, on my site). If you want, offer a simple link on the front page, right next to the Subscribe button that links powerusers automatically to the XML link.

    The only problem with this method is that it takes a lot of effort that most web projects aren’t likely to be willing to go through.

    Like

  37. To Dare Obasanjo, Stefan, Tetra et al,

    Yes, most browsers and readers will have auto-discovery built in, but that’s not all RSS feeds are used for. What if you want to add the feed to Google Reader or netvibes? The point of having an easy-to-find icon or link is that you have a direct way to pick out the link without the need for special software.

    As for Zeldman’s site, yeah there is a link in the sidebar, but I couldn’t find it for ages, and the fact that Robert couldn’t find it either is an example of exactly why we need the easy-to-find icon.

    Like

  38. To Dare Obasanjo, Stefan, Tetra et al,

    Yes, most browsers and readers will have auto-discovery built in, but that’s not all RSS feeds are used for. What if you want to add the feed to Google Reader or netvibes? The point of having an easy-to-find icon or link is that you have a direct way to pick out the link without the need for special software.

    As for Zeldman’s site, yeah there is a link in the sidebar, but I couldn’t find it for ages, and the fact that Robert couldn’t find it either is an example of exactly why we need the easy-to-find icon.

    Like

  39. To Dare Obasanjo, Stefan, Tetra et al,

    Yes, most browsers and readers will have auto-discovery built in, but that’s not all RSS feeds are used for. What if you want to add the feed to Google Reader or netvibes? The point of having an easy-to-find icon or link is that you have a direct way to pick out the link without the need for special software.

    As for Zeldman’s site, yeah there is a link in the sidebar, but I couldn’t find it for ages, and the fact that Robert couldn’t find it either is an example of exactly why we need the easy-to-find icon.

    Like

  40. Jeremy: do you call your DVD player a “device that plays movies on physical round-disk-shaped media?” Why not?

    Like

  41. Jeremy: do you call your DVD player a “device that plays movies on physical round-disk-shaped media?” Why not?

    Like

  42. Jeremy: do you call your DVD player a “device that plays movies on physical round-disk-shaped media?” Why not?

    Like

  43. Randy: I wasn’t complaining about Molly’s blog. We were on another blog site when we got stuck while demonstrating RSS at the Blog Business Summit. Sorry for not making that clear.

    Like

  44. Randy: I wasn’t complaining about Molly’s blog. We were on another blog site when we got stuck while demonstrating RSS at the Blog Business Summit. Sorry for not making that clear.

    Like

  45. Randy: I wasn’t complaining about Molly’s blog. We were on another blog site when we got stuck while demonstrating RSS at the Blog Business Summit. Sorry for not making that clear.

    Like

  46. A VCR isn’t a “VHS player” is it? Is your “web browser” actually a “HTML navigator” or a “HTTP communicator”?

    See, you cam come up with examples that do and don’t suport your point. But why must we make the acronym stew even thicker? Where will this insanity stop?

    This ia about subscribeing to web sites. Period. Plain and simple.

    Like

  47. A VCR isn’t a “VHS player” is it? Is your “web browser” actually a “HTML navigator” or a “HTTP communicator”?

    See, you cam come up with examples that do and don’t suport your point. But why must we make the acronym stew even thicker? Where will this insanity stop?

    This ia about subscribeing to web sites. Period. Plain and simple.

    Like

  48. A VCR isn’t a “VHS player” is it? Is your “web browser” actually a “HTML navigator” or a “HTTP communicator”?

    See, you cam come up with examples that do and don’t suport your point. But why must we make the acronym stew even thicker? Where will this insanity stop?

    This ia about subscribeing to web sites. Period. Plain and simple.

    Like

  49. I think the biggest usability issue with RSS feeds ins’t “how do I figure out the URL”, but “what do I do with the URL”. Clicking on the link – which is what my mom would do – doesn’t work. At best you get a page of XML, which looks like junk to my Mom.

    The best thing right now is that most readers will “auto discover” the feed URL, given the website URL. So you can drag the URL from the browser location field into the reader’s location field, and poof, you’re subscribed. That works with SharpReader most of the time.

    However the better thing would be if clicking on the link accomplished this. The MIME type of an RSS feed should cause the browser to launch your RSS reader. Or maybe we need a different transport indicator, like rss://domain/url instead of http://domain/url, so that the browser knows what to do when a feed link is clicked.

    I totally agree that the usability of feed discover and subscription is a big reason why RSS feeds are not used widely by more people.

    Like

  50. I think the biggest usability issue with RSS feeds ins’t “how do I figure out the URL”, but “what do I do with the URL”. Clicking on the link – which is what my mom would do – doesn’t work. At best you get a page of XML, which looks like junk to my Mom.

    The best thing right now is that most readers will “auto discover” the feed URL, given the website URL. So you can drag the URL from the browser location field into the reader’s location field, and poof, you’re subscribed. That works with SharpReader most of the time.

    However the better thing would be if clicking on the link accomplished this. The MIME type of an RSS feed should cause the browser to launch your RSS reader. Or maybe we need a different transport indicator, like rss://domain/url instead of http://domain/url, so that the browser knows what to do when a feed link is clicked.

    I totally agree that the usability of feed discover and subscription is a big reason why RSS feeds are not used widely by more people.

    Like

  51. I think the biggest usability issue with RSS feeds ins’t “how do I figure out the URL”, but “what do I do with the URL”. Clicking on the link – which is what my mom would do – doesn’t work. At best you get a page of XML, which looks like junk to my Mom.

    The best thing right now is that most readers will “auto discover” the feed URL, given the website URL. So you can drag the URL from the browser location field into the reader’s location field, and poof, you’re subscribed. That works with SharpReader most of the time.

    However the better thing would be if clicking on the link accomplished this. The MIME type of an RSS feed should cause the browser to launch your RSS reader. Or maybe we need a different transport indicator, like rss://domain/url instead of http://domain/url, so that the browser knows what to do when a feed link is clicked.

    I totally agree that the usability of feed discover and subscription is a big reason why RSS feeds are not used widely by more people.

    Like

  52. Robert we had a great discussion on my site a few weeks ago following Dave Winer’s suggestion of a Subscribe button.

    What we came up with is an orange Subscribe and a Help button alongside it – I think it works quite well. Have a look at the buttons in this post – they are free to copy, as is the help text.

    Like

  53. Robert we had a great discussion on my site a few weeks ago following Dave Winer’s suggestion of a Subscribe button.

    What we came up with is an orange Subscribe and a Help button alongside it – I think it works quite well. Have a look at the buttons in this post – they are free to copy, as is the help text.

    Like

  54. Robert we had a great discussion on my site a few weeks ago following Dave Winer’s suggestion of a Subscribe button.

    What we came up with is an orange Subscribe and a Help button alongside it – I think it works quite well. Have a look at the buttons in this post – they are free to copy, as is the help text.

    Like

  55. Developing a standard for RSS is crucial. Preferably a solution which allowed people to click on an RSS feed button (whatever it says on it) which would automatically add it to that users list of feeds which would in turn be used by any/all aggregators that user employs.

    But for now RSS usability definitely sucks. I looked into it quite recently, knowing nothing about it, but wanting to provide my users with the best possible solution. I found that IMHO there are four steps to providing somewhat usable RSS feeds:

    1. Use a (white on orange) ‘SUBSCRIBE’ button.
    2. Include a help button & help page.
    3. Include a link to your feed in the head of your html (for autodiscovery).
    4. Style your feed.

    Of course how you implement these four steps will also determine how user friendly it ends up.

    Anyone know offhand can blogger users style their own feeds without using feedburner or another third party solution?

    Like

  56. Developing a standard for RSS is crucial. Preferably a solution which allowed people to click on an RSS feed button (whatever it says on it) which would automatically add it to that users list of feeds which would in turn be used by any/all aggregators that user employs.

    But for now RSS usability definitely sucks. I looked into it quite recently, knowing nothing about it, but wanting to provide my users with the best possible solution. I found that IMHO there are four steps to providing somewhat usable RSS feeds:

    1. Use a (white on orange) ‘SUBSCRIBE’ button.
    2. Include a help button & help page.
    3. Include a link to your feed in the head of your html (for autodiscovery).
    4. Style your feed.

    Of course how you implement these four steps will also determine how user friendly it ends up.

    Anyone know offhand can blogger users style their own feeds without using feedburner or another third party solution?

    Like

  57. Developing a standard for RSS is crucial. Preferably a solution which allowed people to click on an RSS feed button (whatever it says on it) which would automatically add it to that users list of feeds which would in turn be used by any/all aggregators that user employs.

    But for now RSS usability definitely sucks. I looked into it quite recently, knowing nothing about it, but wanting to provide my users with the best possible solution. I found that IMHO there are four steps to providing somewhat usable RSS feeds:

    1. Use a (white on orange) ‘SUBSCRIBE’ button.
    2. Include a help button & help page.
    3. Include a link to your feed in the head of your html (for autodiscovery).
    4. Style your feed.

    Of course how you implement these four steps will also determine how user friendly it ends up.

    Anyone know offhand can blogger users style their own feeds without using feedburner or another third party solution?

    Like

  58. Pingback: Panasonic Youth
  59. Robert,

    I know your Mom is your top priority right now, as it should be. It’s got to be very difficult and I extend my sympathies to you and your family.

    The issue of RSS usability is indeed a big one. I’ve researched it for months and have just finished development of feedpass.com, a new tool for RSS publishers, bloggers, etc. that simplifies much of the usability issue. It’s essentially a landing page for RSS feeds, allowing content owners to use a single button that gives readers an array of choices for subscription and walks them through the process with ease. It doesn’t modify the feed in any way, so it’s compatible with Feedburner and all other feed management tools.

    In addition, the site creates a monetization program that benefits both content publishers and anyone who wants to create a feedpass page link to the feed. In fact, the content owner can earn money from every person that links to his feed with a feedpass. It’s very cool.

    If you get a chance, I’d love your opinion on it.

    Jim

    Like

  60. Robert,

    I know your Mom is your top priority right now, as it should be. It’s got to be very difficult and I extend my sympathies to you and your family.

    The issue of RSS usability is indeed a big one. I’ve researched it for months and have just finished development of feedpass.com, a new tool for RSS publishers, bloggers, etc. that simplifies much of the usability issue. It’s essentially a landing page for RSS feeds, allowing content owners to use a single button that gives readers an array of choices for subscription and walks them through the process with ease. It doesn’t modify the feed in any way, so it’s compatible with Feedburner and all other feed management tools.

    In addition, the site creates a monetization program that benefits both content publishers and anyone who wants to create a feedpass page link to the feed. In fact, the content owner can earn money from every person that links to his feed with a feedpass. It’s very cool.

    If you get a chance, I’d love your opinion on it.

    Jim

    Like

  61. Robert,

    I know your Mom is your top priority right now, as it should be. It’s got to be very difficult and I extend my sympathies to you and your family.

    The issue of RSS usability is indeed a big one. I’ve researched it for months and have just finished development of feedpass.com, a new tool for RSS publishers, bloggers, etc. that simplifies much of the usability issue. It’s essentially a landing page for RSS feeds, allowing content owners to use a single button that gives readers an array of choices for subscription and walks them through the process with ease. It doesn’t modify the feed in any way, so it’s compatible with Feedburner and all other feed management tools.

    In addition, the site creates a monetization program that benefits both content publishers and anyone who wants to create a feedpass page link to the feed. In fact, the content owner can earn money from every person that links to his feed with a feedpass. It’s very cool.

    If you get a chance, I’d love your opinion on it.

    Jim

    Like

  62. Pingback: Swingers sex
  63. Pingback: madonna porn

Comments are closed.