Chris Pirillo is funny with his “Attack of the Magazines” post. Yeah, that’s a good point. I had a professional journalist lie about me a few months back. They never corrected the post, despite having their brand name dragged into the mud. This crud has been going on a long time in the journalism industry. Steve Wozniak, in my first celebrity interview, back in 1989 warned me about it “don’t believe what they say about me in the papers,” he told me. The journalism industry doesn’t self clean itself out. Did anyone in the journalism industry come to my defense or do any homework or do any stories about the guy who used his millions of readers against me? No.
The truth is if you’re out in public you’ll have to have a thick skin and deal with it by staying engaged. I did note that far fewer people link to the “professional” guy who lied about me (or the organization he works for) than used to link to him — yeah, it’s showed up on Memeorandum a couple of times, but it used to be linked to a LOT more often. He (and his bosses) shot their credibility in the head. How do you know that? Cause he never answered me (nor did he answer the questions of bloggers like Thomas Hawk or Rick Segal) and people know that’s the sign that the credibility is shot. After all, if you aren’t willing to answer questions about your credibility, you probably have none.
At Google on Thursday, when I showed off Channel 9 I pointed to the spot underneath the video. “See,” I said, “you can write ‘Microsoft sucks’ right there and I won’t pull it down.”
Most corporate types don’t get that. Heck, even a few business “experts” who write books with seemingly Cluetrainish titles don’t get that. 🙂
There’s a belief in marketing that corporations should only say “we’re perfect and we have no blemishes — our competitors are the ones with the blemishes.” Oh, that’s such crap.
Anyway, maybe we’ll talk about this later today at the Blog Business Summit’s workshop in Seattle. I’m sure the Fortune article will be a hot topic of conversation.
Evelyn Rodriguez has a wonderful post titled: An Internet Fed Mostly by Amateurs is Fascinating. Oh, I agree, but we do need the pros too. I tell audiences this as well. At Google I was talking with the Chairman of a very large media company. I said “see, if that building there started burning down, I’d be better than most professional journalists in the opening minutes of the fire. Why? Cause I have a video camera here. I can write about it before the journalists show up. But, the professionals usually know the beat a lot better than I do. They know the fire captain. They can listen to their scanners for other news and make connections (we can do that too, but I don’t own a scanner so would need to wait until someone else made that connection).
And, news is really about access anyway. I can’t get access to, say, Iraq, or press conferences in Washington D.C. (heck, I don’t even get invited to the press conferences at Microsoft and I work there).
So, we need both pros and amateurs. Someday this will all settle down and we’ll all get along. But, for now attacking each other gets us lots of traffic and PR mentions. We don’t realize the damage we’re doing to each other, but we’ll figure that out someday too.
Scobleizer 
I think you are right. Not answering, not even try to rectify mistakes makes one look either distant or malicious. Specially since everything can be found through Google.
LikeLike
I think you are right. Not answering, not even try to rectify mistakes makes one look either distant or malicious. Specially since everything can be found through Google.
LikeLike
Chris Pirillo is also funny, and ABSURDLY HYPOCRITICAL, by spreading FUD and misinformation in his domestic “Chris & Ponzi do the dishes” type podcasts, which he well knows are at least as widely played as a typical magazine article.
Listening to the recent one, you’d get the idea that iPods didn’t work properly with Windows and that it was far better to use a PSP to play music downloaded by BitTorrent and for sweet girls like Ponzi to carry their digital photos around. Pure misinformation simply because he hates all things Apple and has a constant agenda of steering people away from them.
Perhaps this is just his “Attack of the Podcasts” backlash. Whatever. Magazines, blogs, podcasts, whiny little Microsoft fanboys… take ’em all with a grain of salt.
(You should also disclose, Robert, that Chris is a close personal friend, perhaps even your “young apprentice!”)
LikeLike
Chris Pirillo is also funny, and ABSURDLY HYPOCRITICAL, by spreading FUD and misinformation in his domestic “Chris & Ponzi do the dishes” type podcasts, which he well knows are at least as widely played as a typical magazine article.
Listening to the recent one, you’d get the idea that iPods didn’t work properly with Windows and that it was far better to use a PSP to play music downloaded by BitTorrent and for sweet girls like Ponzi to carry their digital photos around. Pure misinformation simply because he hates all things Apple and has a constant agenda of steering people away from them.
Perhaps this is just his “Attack of the Podcasts” backlash. Whatever. Magazines, blogs, podcasts, whiny little Microsoft fanboys… take ’em all with a grain of salt.
(You should also disclose, Robert, that Chris is a close personal friend, perhaps even your “young apprentice!”)
LikeLike
Hey that reporter LOOKED at me wrong, I don’t like his TONE. He looks shifty. What? Did you catch that? I think he snarled at ME. I don’t get that type of humor, but I think they are making FUN of me. I demand ACTION and a RETRACTION! I never wrote that, I never said that, those are not my words. And that’s NOT what I meant. Well if I meant that then, here’s what I mean now or here’s what I have been now instructed to now mean or think. Poor poor pitiful me. Oh these journalists won’t let me be. Lord have mercy on me. Woe woe is me. Scream, wail, pout, rant.
And wow that’s really funny as I too…
I had a professional blogger lie about me a few months back. He never corrected the post.
LikeLike
Hey that reporter LOOKED at me wrong, I don’t like his TONE. He looks shifty. What? Did you catch that? I think he snarled at ME. I don’t get that type of humor, but I think they are making FUN of me. I demand ACTION and a RETRACTION! I never wrote that, I never said that, those are not my words. And that’s NOT what I meant. Well if I meant that then, here’s what I mean now or here’s what I have been now instructed to now mean or think. Poor poor pitiful me. Oh these journalists won’t let me be. Lord have mercy on me. Woe woe is me. Scream, wail, pout, rant.
And wow that’s really funny as I too…
I had a professional blogger lie about me a few months back. He never corrected the post.
LikeLike
Chris: please explain how. I’ll do some research into that. But, your credibility is pretty damn low with me at the moment so I’ll need to fact check you, sorry.
LikeLike
Chris: please explain how. I’ll do some research into that. But, your credibility is pretty damn low with me at the moment so I’ll need to fact check you, sorry.
LikeLike
Well the feeling is mutual. But interesting that you can determine “credibility” before you have fact-checked. 🙂 No biggie and it really doesn’t bother me by now, my skin is bullet-proof thick, but you are the one still kicking it around, just pointing out that it does indeed go both ways. You put yourself out there and whince when they dive bomb, but then you can lay waste to all sorts of lesser mortals too. Two big egos smashing all the “little people” in the wake, usually how it goes. Anyways. End Prog.
LikeLike
Well the feeling is mutual. But interesting that you can determine “credibility” before you have fact-checked. 🙂 No biggie and it really doesn’t bother me by now, my skin is bullet-proof thick, but you are the one still kicking it around, just pointing out that it does indeed go both ways. You put yourself out there and whince when they dive bomb, but then you can lay waste to all sorts of lesser mortals too. Two big egos smashing all the “little people” in the wake, usually how it goes. Anyways. End Prog.
LikeLike