Published by Robert Scoble
I give you a front-row seat on the future. Focusing most of my efforts now on next-generation augmented reality and artificial intelligence, AKA "mixed reality."
SUBSCRIBE TO MY NEWSLETTER: http://clevermoe.com/scobleizer-news/
BUY OUR NEW BOOK: https://www.amazon.com/Fourth-Transformation-Robert-Scoble/dp/1539894444 "The Fourth Transformation: How augmented reality and artificial intelligence will change everything."
WATCH MY LATEST SPEECHES:
State of VR with Philip Rosedale (done in VR itself, very cool): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2zAA1EVGUZU
At GEOINT, June 2017: http://trajectorymagazine.com/glimpse-new-world/
Augmented World Expo, June 2017: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l4xHILvLD8E
At Leade.rs, April 2017: https://youtu.be/52_0JshgjXI
+++++++++++
BIO:
Scoble gives you a front-row seat on the future.
Literally. He had the first ride in the first Tesla. Siri was launched in his house. He's been the first to share all sorts of technologies and companies with you, from Flipboard to Pandora to Instagram.
Today he's focusing on mixed reality, AKA "next-generation augmented reality" which will include a new user interface for EVERYTHING in your life (IoT, Smart Cities, driverless cars, robots, drones, etc).
That's based on his view thanks to his past experience as futurist at Rackspace.
Best place to find Scoble? On his Facebook profile at https://www.facebook.com/RobertScoble
He has been a technology blogger since 2000, was one of five people who built Microsoft's Channel 9 video blog/community, worked at Fast Company Magazine running its TV efforts, and has been part of technology media businesses since 1993.
++++++++
SPEAKER PITCH:
Apple and Facebook now have revealed their Augmented Reality strategies, which means your business needs one too. Rely on Robert Scoble, the world's top authority on AR, to bring to your conference what businesses should do next.
SPEECH ABSTRACT #1:
TITLE: The Fourth Transformation: What's next in mixed reality (AR and AI) and the future of technology?
Here's an example of this talk at Leade.rs in Paris in April, 2017: https://youtu.be/52_0JshgjXI
Why "the Fourth Transformation?"
Soon we will have phones and glasses that do full on augmented reality. Everything you look at will potentially be augmented. This world is coming in late 2017 with a new iPhone from Apple, amongst other products. Microsoft is betting everything on its HoloLens glasses that do mixed reality and the industry is spending many billions of dollars in R&D and funding new companies like Magic Leap.
This future will be the user interface for IoT, Smart Cities, autonomous cars, robots, drones, and your TV.
This is a big deal and Robert will take you through what mixed reality is and how it will change every business.
Learn more about Robert's speaking style and contact his agent at http://odemanagement.com/robert-scoble/Robert-Scoble.html
++++++++
SPEECH ABSTRACT #2:
"The Next Two Clicks of Moore's Law."
Over the next four years, or two clicks of Moore's Law, a ton about our technology world will change. Scoble will bring you the best from his travels visiting R&D labs, startups, and innovators around the world.
He views the world through his rose-colored-mixed-reality glasses, which will be the new user interface for self driving cars, Smart Cities, IoT, and many other things in our world.
He'll send you off with some lessons for companies both large and small.
++++++++
SPEECH ABSTRACT #3:
"Personalized Meaning: What is Augmented Reality For?"
As we enter a far more technological world where even cars drive themselves, I predict we'll see a blowback toward the analog, more authentic world.
What role does augmented reality play in both worlds?
Get Scoble's insight into where augmented reality is going, see tons of real-world demos, and understand what he means by 'personalized meaning.'
CONTACT:
If you are looking to contact me, email is best: scobleizer@gmail.com.
++++++++
ENDORSEMENTS:
IZEA Top 25 Tech Influencers: https://izea.com/2017/07/07/25-top-tech-influencers/
Time: One of the top 140 Twitterers!
FT: One of the five most influential Twitterers!
Inc. Top 5 on list of Tech Power Players You Need to Know: http://www.inc.com/john-rampton/30-power-players-in-tech-you-need-to-know.html
Next Reality: #4 on top 50 AR influencer list: https://next.reality.news/news/nr50-next-realitys-50-people-watch-augmented-mixed-reality-0177454/
View all posts by Robert Scoble
yeesh. I always thought bloggers were just normal people saying what’s on their mind in a rather public fashion.
Plus blogging is a good way to meet people too 🙂
LikeLike
yeesh. I always thought bloggers were just normal people saying what’s on their mind in a rather public fashion.
Plus blogging is a good way to meet people too 🙂
LikeLike
What, Forbes doesn’t like User Generated Content? Come on, it’s where the money is at!!
🙂
LikeLike
What, Forbes doesn’t like User Generated Content? Come on, it’s where the money is at!!
🙂
LikeLike
from a disclosure point of view – its interesting that daniel himself has been under scrutiny by bloggers, for what looks suspiciously like anti-IBM coverage. check out controlscaddy.com for the backstory. or this http://www.lotusgeek.com/SapphireOak/LotusGeekBlog.nsf/plinks/ROLR-6B962Z
this story is reminiscent of the current NY Times current debacle. partisan reporter, editors who should perhaps monitor the story more closely and everybody ends up embarrassed. lyons calls out the Radicati case, but not his own role in the ongoing story…
why not just write a leader about his experiences, which would have the virtue of being honest and personal at least, if potentially misguided.
LikeLike
from a disclosure point of view – its interesting that daniel himself has been under scrutiny by bloggers, for what looks suspiciously like anti-IBM coverage. check out controlscaddy.com for the backstory. or this http://www.lotusgeek.com/SapphireOak/LotusGeekBlog.nsf/plinks/ROLR-6B962Z
this story is reminiscent of the current NY Times current debacle. partisan reporter, editors who should perhaps monitor the story more closely and everybody ends up embarrassed. lyons calls out the Radicati case, but not his own role in the ongoing story…
why not just write a leader about his experiences, which would have the virtue of being honest and personal at least, if potentially misguided.
LikeLike
What ‘whole industries’ are threatened by this stuff?
LikeLike
What ‘whole industries’ are threatened by this stuff?
LikeLike
I’m with Siobhan’s question a bit. A lot of bloggers (Scoble NOT included as far as I know) have said journalism itself is at risk from blogs, which just isn’t going to happen. It’s a misunderstanding of journalism and of blogs to think that could happen. After all, many of the most popular blogs are linking to the work of journalists, so if the journalists disappear who’s doing the actual reporting? If bloggers are left to go out into the world and report on things, that would make them, ding ding, journalists.
LikeLike
I’m with Siobhan’s question a bit. A lot of bloggers (Scoble NOT included as far as I know) have said journalism itself is at risk from blogs, which just isn’t going to happen. It’s a misunderstanding of journalism and of blogs to think that could happen. After all, many of the most popular blogs are linking to the work of journalists, so if the journalists disappear who’s doing the actual reporting? If bloggers are left to go out into the world and report on things, that would make them, ding ding, journalists.
LikeLike
Hi Robert. I thought that the thrust of the article was that power without accountability was a dangerous and damaging mix. I also thought the article highlighted how conversation was attempted but unsuccessful in each of the examples cited.
I was wondering what you would think of somebody like Mini-Microsoft started publishing stuff that was not 100% true and did severe damage to you or your employer? Do you think you might object to that type of blogging like the author of the Forbes article does?
LikeLike
Hi Robert. I thought that the thrust of the article was that power without accountability was a dangerous and damaging mix. I also thought the article highlighted how conversation was attempted but unsuccessful in each of the examples cited.
I was wondering what you would think of somebody like Mini-Microsoft started publishing stuff that was not 100% true and did severe damage to you or your employer? Do you think you might object to that type of blogging like the author of the Forbes article does?
LikeLike
Holy smokes- this is an article? It is written like an unabashed editorial. Now every unplugged grandma in america has something new to fear.
One of the reasons blogs are becoming so huge is precisely because of this kind of BS reporting.
LikeLike
Holy smokes- this is an article? It is written like an unabashed editorial. Now every unplugged grandma in america has something new to fear.
One of the reasons blogs are becoming so huge is precisely because of this kind of BS reporting.
LikeLike
Fact is bloogers are not held to any requirement to make truthful, clear posts. I know eventually blogs together fix them, but in days where companies and people’s lives can be destroyed so easily, blogs with lies, fud etc come out to what the Forbes points out. I blog, but I sadly have to agree with forbes on this one.
LikeLike
Fact is bloogers are not held to any requirement to make truthful, clear posts. I know eventually blogs together fix them, but in days where companies and people’s lives can be destroyed so easily, blogs with lies, fud etc come out to what the Forbes points out. I blog, but I sadly have to agree with forbes on this one.
LikeLike
Badri: if I lie, don’t make truthful posts, I can be sued. I will lose credibility. I will lose readership. People will stop linking to me. Maybe you need to start reading and listening to real people who don’t have anonymous blogs.
Also, I’ve had a “professional” journalist lie about me in their articles. So, don’t give me the BS line that you can’t do that in a professional article.
LikeLike
Badri: if I lie, don’t make truthful posts, I can be sued. I will lose credibility. I will lose readership. People will stop linking to me. Maybe you need to start reading and listening to real people who don’t have anonymous blogs.
Also, I’ve had a “professional” journalist lie about me in their articles. So, don’t give me the BS line that you can’t do that in a professional article.
LikeLike
The Forbes article pointed out the difficulty of suing bloggers. Professional news organizations take legal action and loss of credibility much more seriously.
Nobody said that professional journalist never lie, make a mistake, or portray a bias. But they do try to aspire to some codes of conduct, even if they sometimes fail.
In the blogosphere the lack of accountability is a real problem and it is unfortunate that the blogosphere refuses to acknowledge and converse about it.
LikeLike
The Forbes article pointed out the difficulty of suing bloggers. Professional news organizations take legal action and loss of credibility much more seriously.
Nobody said that professional journalist never lie, make a mistake, or portray a bias. But they do try to aspire to some codes of conduct, even if they sometimes fail.
In the blogosphere the lack of accountability is a real problem and it is unfortunate that the blogosphere refuses to acknowledge and converse about it.
LikeLike
Scoble, I laughed when I read this:
“Maybe you need to start reading and listening to real people who don’t have anonymous blogs.”
You regularly roll out this MiniMicrosoft anon coward as some type of blogger to admire because he keeps things transparent.
Make up your mind, mon! LOL
LikeLike
Scoble, I laughed when I read this:
“Maybe you need to start reading and listening to real people who don’t have anonymous blogs.”
You regularly roll out this MiniMicrosoft anon coward as some type of blogger to admire because he keeps things transparent.
Make up your mind, mon! LOL
LikeLike
Is Andrew Orlowski writing for Forbes?
LikeLike
Is Andrew Orlowski writing for Forbes?
LikeLike
Scoble I never said professional jounalists dont lie. They do, but when they get caught they stand to loose a lot more than any blogger does. Which also means hopfully they will take more care as what they publish.
Nowadays you have bloggers that publish news, but since traditional press needs to keep up pace they publish with verifying anything (look at inquirer or register, they screw up enough).
As TDavid pointed out there are anonymous blogs, that we assume are real. And there are real blogs that we assume tell the truth.
LikeLike
Scoble I never said professional jounalists dont lie. They do, but when they get caught they stand to loose a lot more than any blogger does. Which also means hopfully they will take more care as what they publish.
Nowadays you have bloggers that publish news, but since traditional press needs to keep up pace they publish with verifying anything (look at inquirer or register, they screw up enough).
As TDavid pointed out there are anonymous blogs, that we assume are real. And there are real blogs that we assume tell the truth.
LikeLike
Some really great points there, predictable however that bloggers would froth into a thin-milkshake hysteria foam. Burningbird was reasonable, the rest are in denial.
LikeLike
Some really great points there, predictable however that bloggers would froth into a thin-milkshake hysteria foam. Burningbird was reasonable, the rest are in denial.
LikeLike
But the main flaw of the piece is that it way way exaggerates the importance of online gossip. Don’t trip over yourself too much, blogs are National Enquirer’ish. Only fools take info gleaned from blogs as the gospel truth.
LikeLike
But the main flaw of the piece is that it way way exaggerates the importance of online gossip. Don’t trip over yourself too much, blogs are National Enquirer’ish. Only fools take info gleaned from blogs as the gospel truth.
LikeLike
Christopher – you didn’t look hard enough if you didn’t see beyond burningbird. There were several great counterpoints to that Forbes piece which ironically starts an article about attack with fighting words.
Speaking of birds, you fly here to many Scoble posts with your predictably cynical flames. Some of the things you say are much more biting and critical than bloggers who wrote about things like the Kryptonite lock incident. Just because you made them in the comment area doesn’t mean you aren’t being lumped in with the same lynch mob characterized in that piece. And BTW, I *agree* with some of your comments, but dude, geez, smile once in awhile 😉
Let’s take the Kryptonite thing and seriously analyze it. They should be thanking the blogs for pointing out a flaw in their product and making it better. Instead, they continue to harbor some kind of grudge and fear over a product flaw that put THEIR CUSTOMER’S bikes at great risk to theft. At least from the quote in that Forbes article they are bitter which makes me lose a ton of respect for their company.
I won’t be buying any Kryptonite locks any time soon. So what, I’m just one prospective customer with three kids with bikes … and three possible bike lock sales they don’t get because their action on this situation was too late and bitter about how they received the information.
If my memory serves nearly a week went by since that video was released showing the flaw in the locks before they did anything. Isn’t that just a tad irresponsible that they didn’t act quicker?
All it would have taken was one PR person running out on their own blog (if they had one) or contacting a few of the bloggers that broke the story and giving an official statement.
Anybody who makes something like a lock should go through better usabilility testing. That’s the lesson to be learned, here, not that “oh no, don’t piss off those mean, terrible bloggers.”
Still, if I’m understand the logic of the Forbes article, the bloggers are a bunch of terrible people for spotlighting a flaw that put people’s property at serious, unnecessary risk. Customer vigilantes, maybe, but how is what bloggers did much different than what Consumer Reports does?
The point is headhunter blogs and people with angry agendas are rather easy to spot out and readers aren’t as dumb as that Forbes article seems to assume. People will do their own source verification. And they will vote with their wallets and feet.
I have faith in readers. Blogs give the common man a voice that MSM and news and the government don’t seem to give a damn about much any more.
Meanwhile EXXON is reporting record profits and we are out here paying $3+ a gallon. We know who is in who’s pockets.
Now maybe there is a scandal Forbes should write about …
LikeLike
Christopher – you didn’t look hard enough if you didn’t see beyond burningbird. There were several great counterpoints to that Forbes piece which ironically starts an article about attack with fighting words.
Speaking of birds, you fly here to many Scoble posts with your predictably cynical flames. Some of the things you say are much more biting and critical than bloggers who wrote about things like the Kryptonite lock incident. Just because you made them in the comment area doesn’t mean you aren’t being lumped in with the same lynch mob characterized in that piece. And BTW, I *agree* with some of your comments, but dude, geez, smile once in awhile 😉
Let’s take the Kryptonite thing and seriously analyze it. They should be thanking the blogs for pointing out a flaw in their product and making it better. Instead, they continue to harbor some kind of grudge and fear over a product flaw that put THEIR CUSTOMER’S bikes at great risk to theft. At least from the quote in that Forbes article they are bitter which makes me lose a ton of respect for their company.
I won’t be buying any Kryptonite locks any time soon. So what, I’m just one prospective customer with three kids with bikes … and three possible bike lock sales they don’t get because their action on this situation was too late and bitter about how they received the information.
If my memory serves nearly a week went by since that video was released showing the flaw in the locks before they did anything. Isn’t that just a tad irresponsible that they didn’t act quicker?
All it would have taken was one PR person running out on their own blog (if they had one) or contacting a few of the bloggers that broke the story and giving an official statement.
Anybody who makes something like a lock should go through better usabilility testing. That’s the lesson to be learned, here, not that “oh no, don’t piss off those mean, terrible bloggers.”
Still, if I’m understand the logic of the Forbes article, the bloggers are a bunch of terrible people for spotlighting a flaw that put people’s property at serious, unnecessary risk. Customer vigilantes, maybe, but how is what bloggers did much different than what Consumer Reports does?
The point is headhunter blogs and people with angry agendas are rather easy to spot out and readers aren’t as dumb as that Forbes article seems to assume. People will do their own source verification. And they will vote with their wallets and feet.
I have faith in readers. Blogs give the common man a voice that MSM and news and the government don’t seem to give a damn about much any more.
Meanwhile EXXON is reporting record profits and we are out here paying $3+ a gallon. We know who is in who’s pockets.
Now maybe there is a scandal Forbes should write about …
LikeLike
Maybe everyone needs to remember that in general, Forbes et al are “all about the money”….
LikeLike
Maybe everyone needs to remember that in general, Forbes et al are “all about the money”….
LikeLike
Ah, backlash. A growing pain of anything entering the mainstream. 😉
LikeLike
Ah, backlash. A growing pain of anything entering the mainstream. 😉
LikeLike
Although the new Forbes cover story ignores the positive effects of blogging on the business world, it at least establishes the reality of negative effects. I fear that some bloggers are committing the same hypocrisy they pin on Forbes by seeking publicity and advertising revenue rather than to publish balanced, accurate information.
LikeLike
Although the new Forbes cover story ignores the positive effects of blogging on the business world, it at least establishes the reality of negative effects. I fear that some bloggers are committing the same hypocrisy they pin on Forbes by seeking publicity and advertising revenue rather than to publish balanced, accurate information.
LikeLike
Problem is Obvious
LikeLike
Problem is Obvious
LikeLike
Professional journalists have editors, publishers, lawyers, and advertisers overseeing their published content. These act as a system of checks and balances. It’s not a perfect system, especially in the trade press where vendors buy off writers, but I think you have to say it’s served the public interest damn well over the past 100 years.
Conversely, there are some pretty insidious anonymous bloggers out there, operating in local arenas, tarring and feathering people in ways that a modern bylined journalist would be prevented from doing.
Anonymous attack blogging is all well and good, until YOU are the target of an anonymous blogger’s smear campaign. Then the problem with gutless anonymous attack blogging comes home.
There’s a reason KKK members wear hoods. It’s the same reason attack bloggers are anonymous: to terrorize their opponents.
There’s a reason the signers of the Declaration of Independence put their names to paper, under pain of death: the courage of their convictions.
Bloggers and blogging will not become widely respected pursuits until those who advocate same also advocate transparency, accountability, and responsibility—loudly and continuously. That means standing behind bylines, not hiding behind pen names.
LikeLike
Professional journalists have editors, publishers, lawyers, and advertisers overseeing their published content. These act as a system of checks and balances. It’s not a perfect system, especially in the trade press where vendors buy off writers, but I think you have to say it’s served the public interest damn well over the past 100 years.
Conversely, there are some pretty insidious anonymous bloggers out there, operating in local arenas, tarring and feathering people in ways that a modern bylined journalist would be prevented from doing.
Anonymous attack blogging is all well and good, until YOU are the target of an anonymous blogger’s smear campaign. Then the problem with gutless anonymous attack blogging comes home.
There’s a reason KKK members wear hoods. It’s the same reason attack bloggers are anonymous: to terrorize their opponents.
There’s a reason the signers of the Declaration of Independence put their names to paper, under pain of death: the courage of their convictions.
Bloggers and blogging will not become widely respected pursuits until those who advocate same also advocate transparency, accountability, and responsibility—loudly and continuously. That means standing behind bylines, not hiding behind pen names.
LikeLike
Your site is exactly the kind of sites which make the net surfing so fun. black girls on their mission: http://www.apple.com , substances that cure you , think that will make relief
LikeLike
Your site is exactly the kind of sites which make the net surfing so fun. black girls on their mission: http://www.apple.com , substances that cure you , think that will make relief
LikeLike
Very original content. I really like your site. substances that cure you: http://www.nhm.ac.uk/info/history/build.html , when Chair Love Slot Create think that will make relief , when Girl is Slot it will Expect Soldier black girls on their mission
LikeLike
Very original content. I really like your site. substances that cure you: http://www.nhm.ac.uk/info/history/build.html , when Chair Love Slot Create think that will make relief , when Girl is Slot it will Expect Soldier black girls on their mission
LikeLike